教育王國

標題: 你地心目的至TOP既國際小學系邊間? [打印本頁]

作者: 24112006 時間: 07-12-28 12:07 標題: 你地心目的至TOP既國際小學系邊間?

排列1下呀

作者: KimmyMammy 時間: 07-12-28 15:25

Don't play this game here, please! If those parents who like to play the ranking game, they should rather send their kids to tradition schools of local system!!

作者: Share 時間: 07-12-28 16:51

GSI,
But too expensive

作者: nintendo 時間: 07-12-29 10:48

My observation is that, international school parents here at BK are with the same 3 - 4 international schools (namely ESF, SIS, ICS, etc.) Then we have merely a few from GSIS, AIS, HKIS, etc.

I think we can safely presume that everyone would rank their own child's school a top 3 school. With such "combination" of "parent population", I just do not think you would really get meaningful "poll" out of your topic.

PS. I am one of the majority.

[ 本文章最後由 nintendo 於 07-12-29 10:58 編輯 ]

作者: van2006 時間: 07-12-29 22:57

Can anyone write down the full name( chinese or english) of the top 3 international school.

作者: Cara2006 時間: 07-12-30 10:24

bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 esf 小學小一就比 esf 幼稚園的本地土生孩子霸晒 d 位。
而新到香港的外籍孩子，就更加難入 esf，因為隨時要等上一兩年才能插班。亦因此，esf 學校 (尤其九龍區) 基本上 9 成係香港土生孩子。
esf 學費平，亦吸引了大量較中下階層的學生，他們父母很多都學歷不高，英語水平差，部份更只是勉強應付學費，這類家庭家中的英語環境差；當然父母希望孩子有好些的教育唔奇，就像國內人事賒借都要來講生 bb 一樣，好多本地中下階層，近年都看上了國際學校。
唔難見到單單 bk 都有好多人打聽 esf 的收費，部份都坦白表明，自己經濟環境，英語水平較差。
近年，好多 esf 孩子，家長本身知識水平英語水平都低，好多在家都幫唔到孩子學習，孩子去到三四年班，問題越是嚴重，學校亦會 "提醒" 家長，孩子的英文唔好，被要求出去惡補英文。 esf 亦有另一個包袱，就係唔可以好持本地名校咁，趕 d 差的學生走，話就好聽，話有教無類，但係校內如果身為國際學校，都竟然有大量英語差的學生，真係好匪夷所思。
自己諗下，孩子同咁多水平參差的小朋友做同學，在學校講的，是 broken 英文。
這裡好多 esf 家長，每次有人分析 esf 形勢，都比人話抹黑，但係 esf 有咁多學生，你地又知道有幾多 case 真係好的？又有幾多 case，係讀唔上去呢？講真，上得黎 bk，已經起碼係關心孩子學業的一群。我知有 d 家長，完全唔理孩子的事，從來唔 show up 參與孩子學校活動，亦唔會在家輔助孩子 reading，learning 等，當然，佢地亦從來唔上 bk，佢地的失敗 case，有幾多可以 "傳" 到 bk？
esf 家長當然唔會主動話你聽，衰 d 講，家醜不出外傳，知道有 d 差例子都唔會講。
其實 bk 以往都有好多家長講過 d esf 的好多問題，但次次都比人話，打你為 "抹黑" ，好多 topic 都沉晒底，反而 "唱好" esf 的，就不斷被 up 和附和。
我一直都被評為，孩子考唔到 esf，而上黎抹黑；我想掉轉頭問，我地大家都係網上交流，都只用網名，點解講 "缺點" 就一定係假，講 "好處" 就一定係真？
esf 家長們，其實我講的情形係唔係真，你地心裡有數。
未係 esf 家長們，你可以再想想我分析的收生情形，再估計學生的背景。
讀國際學校，都係想 "國際" 一些，如果國際學校被本地學生霸晒 d 位，會失去 "國際性"。我知 esf 而家有個新的 policy，比外國到港的孩子，可以預早 secure 個位，我覺得係好事，反正 esf 當年 establish 的目的唔係服務本地土生孩子，而係要為外籍孩子提供教育。
唔講喇。
要反搏我的，情討論內容，唔好又係話我孩子考唔到。

作者: Cara2006 時間: 07-12-30 10:27

要排名，當然一定係 GSIS，HKIS 最好喇。
其他的，就係 CIS，CANIS，ICS，CAIS。

作者: 鳳梨 時間: 07-12-30 12:06

係外國even本地出生但屋企唔係用英文為first language, d小朋友都要上d"加強英語班"即"ESL", 所以我唔懷疑本地學生就算讀esf, d英文一定合標準.

請問你小朋友讀邊間IS呢?

原文章由 Cara2006 於 07-12-30 10:24 發表
bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 ...

作者: babyoush 時間: 07-12-30 19:12

原文章由鳳梨於 07-12-30 12:06 發表
係外國even本地出生但屋企唔係用英文為first language, d小朋友都要上d"加強英語班"即"ESL", 所以我唔懷疑本地學生就算讀esf, d英文一定合標準.

請問你小朋友讀邊間IS呢?

...

我比小朋友讀IS但都打算同佢補英文, 雖然日日都同老師講, 屋企都有提供英語環境比佢地, 但始終唔係母語, 補下會安心D

作者: happy_mum 時間: 07-12-30 21:07

Sorry to say that i also notice there is a lot of esf parents on this web-site.

原文章由 Cara2006 於 07-12-30 10:24 發表
bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 ...

作者: reneeleung 時間: 07-12-30 23:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Yau_Cheung 時間: 07-12-31 00:03

原文章由 reneeleung 於 07-12-30 23:07 發表
其實cara2006講得好啱, 家長support唔到(學習方面), 選擇國際學校只會令小朋友得唔到適當的支援.
有有睇今期"go home" (差不多名), 訪問童愛玲, 佢個男讀gsis. ...

今期"go home" (差不多名), 訪問童愛玲, 佢個男讀gsis - Where can I watch? Can you share more?

作者: reneeleung 時間: 07-12-31 01:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: WYmom 時間: 07-12-31 08:15

原文章由 happy_mum 於 07-12-30 21:07 發表
Sorry to say that i also notice there is a lot of esf parents on this web-site.

Why sorry? ESF parents providing help and discussion is bad??  Don't you notice that actually most topics are questions raised by non-ESF parents?  How about many parents discussing those top famous local schools like DBS, LS, DGS, MCS etc. on BK?  Does it mean that these popular schools are bad??

It takes a long time for any school to build up good track records and reputation, rational parents will understand a school through a lot of research using hard and soft data and personal visits. There are always students performing very well to very bad in any school,  rational parents usually look at the average performance, % of good and bad results, and most importantly, your own way of educating kids.  e.g. HKIS has good results and reputation, it also has drug problems.  There is no point to rank schools of different countries using different cirriculum and educational systems based on someone's subjective comments, personal bias or hatred towards certain schools.

Parents of IS know that most IS help students to learn based on assessments of their own abilities, there is no rankings or comparisons with others. IS schools use a lot of ways to encourage positive learning rather than use punishment. The mentality is totally different from studying in local schools.  The ranking game is just a way to initiate unnecessary fights among different schools, just like in the local school session, most topics are comparing A school vs B school, and we will see people voting and attacking others endlessly!!  Very entertaining? Ha!

[ 本文章最後由 WYmom 於 07-12-31 08:17 編輯 ]

作者: wisekid2007 時間: 07-12-31 11:04

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: wisekid2007 時間: 07-12-31 11:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 24112006 時間: 07-12-31 11:19

好多謝你地既意見, 因為想為阿囡睇定國際學校的路, 看看如果部署會較好.

阿囡而家歲幾啦, 就黎要考幼稚園, 因為我個代阿媽唔會諗, 而家到我啦, 緊系想阿囡行條路好少少, 同佢選間較好既學校啦.

另外, 你地可唔可以將個學校簡寫寫為長寫呀, 因為對國際學校既名唔系太熟, 唔該晒.

作者: Cayenne 時間: 07-12-31 11:51

原文章由 WYmom 於 07-12-31 08:15 發表

HKIS has good results and reputation, it also has drug problems.

Not trying to add fuel to any flame wars

, but it is regrettable that HKIS's frank approach to eradicate drug abuse makes it, in the eyes of the uninitiated , not as an example of pro-active pragmatism , but a festering drug den.

Drug problem is epidemic. It's found in most local schools, it's found in most international schools too ( for an example, see here : http://www.geoexpat.com/forum/thread6245.html ).Most schools prefer to sweep it under the carpet and pretend that it doesn't exist,

, while schools like HKIS who take an active stand against drug abuse are stigmatized as THE schools with drug problem.

My child was a HKIS student. He has friends from other IS and local schools too. From what he gathered, drug problem in IS is far less prevalent than many local schools, in contrast to HK urban mythology . HKIS, which maintains a strict drug monitoring programme, probably has even less.

作者: WYmom 時間: 07-12-31 12:30

原文章由 Cayenne 於 07-12-31 11:51 發表

Not trying to add fuel to any flame wars , but it is regrettable that HKIS's frank approach to eradicate drug abuse makes it, in the eyes of the uninitiated , not as an example of pr ...

Cayenne,

Understand your point. HKIS is positive in preventing drug problem. Yes, it is also one of the problems in other schools too, local or IS, also see it in schools overseas. Maybe the young generation nowadays in advanced countries are living too well!

Anyway, just feel that it is so naive to choose schools by ranking, especially IS are all different in their systems cater for different countries.

作者: Yau_Cheung 時間: 07-12-31 13:05

原文章由 reneeleung 於 07-12-31 01:53 發表
sorry. 打錯字, 係童愛玲個仔,48歲讀gsis, 個訪問童愛玲有幾詳細分析點解選擇gsis同佢的步處方法. 但你可以睇下佢之前响明報的訪問, 差不多, 但今期"go home"詳細d. "go home"係一本magazine. 我响會所睇到.

...

hi reneeleung,

Thanks!

作者: Pooh_Pooh 時間: 08-1-1 08:37

我覺得每個人的"需要"都唔同, depends on個小朋友本身, 加埋父母的選擇...

我自己會揀"CIS", 因為我想個女可以同時學好英文+普通話(中文)
之前參觀過呢間學校, 對學生&校舍都幾impressive...

作者: 丁家貓 時間: 08-1-1 16:26

係呢個討論區內都唔係第一次睇到妳係度發表"esf既家長好多都係中等收入呀，家長d英文水平低呀，仔女d學校通告都未必識睇呀，自己都攪唔掂點樣去support小朋友讀IS呀!" 妳不停係度重覆呢d所謂既point但係呢d跟本係係妳自己根深柢固既偏見!

敢問妳的上幾代，甚至乎妳的祖父母可能係文盲字都唔識多隻都唔好講話教小朋友，咁佢地有冇送妳地父母去讀書？妳既父母又有冇送妳去學校讀書？
自己英文唔好就要d仔女跟妳條舊路行？英文唔夠好出去補習有乜問題？好多local school既學生都有出去補習中文啦，又有乜問題？

各位有意思比小朋友入esf既媽咪千祈唔好比d連打架同玩都未識分既人誤導。

原文章由 Cara2006 於 07-12-30 10:24 發表
bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 ...

作者: happy_mum 時間: 08-1-1 16:52

WYmon,

I am not here to take side of anyone. However, if you quoted my reply and asking me question, let me just simply give you a reply.

1. "Sorry to say" is just an opening phase of an sentance. Of course, i have nothing to be sorry for.

2.Although there are parents out there which is non-related to esf school, but they are mainly asking about esf school issue, such as i often seen parents asking for comment on RC. I have to say that there is nothing wrong with that as well as esf is a big organization. More schools,more students and more parents to discuss about things.

3.The truth is that there is not as many parents of other IS in bk forum to discuss on other IS. Such as HKIS, CIS or GSIS. Or perhaps I just seldom see it here?

4.BK is an open forum for everyone to express their view. Once again i must say that I am not taking any side. Just stating facts. Would appreciate if you can be opened to other people' point of view as well.

原文章由 WYmom 於 07-12-31 08:15 發表

Why sorry? ESF parents providing help and discussion is bad?? Don't you notice that actually most topics are questions raised by non-ESF parents? How about many parents discussing those top famous ...

作者: WYmom 時間: 08-1-1 19:38

原文章由 happy_mum 於 08-1-1 16:52 發表
WYmon,

I am not here to take side of anyone. However, if you quoted my reply and asking me question, let me just simply give you a reply.

1. "Sorry to say" is just an opening phase of an sentance. O ...

If you read my messages in the past few years, you will know that I am always open to other's opinion and have shared a lot in the past, I have also responded to your recent query on DC. I am sorry to say that your "opening phase" is an expression of taking side for that "famous" person who has no experience with IS but keeps on attacking ESF without grounds.

There have been various discussions on different IS previously, many parents of other IS have given comments, you can search for them as you like. Actually, I think as many IS have been very well-established and well-known, people won't be very keen to discuss a lot. RC is very new, so there are more queries and discussion on it.

作者: jui 時間: 08-1-2 12:09

原文章由 丁家貓 於 08-1-1 16:26 發表
係呢個討論區內都唔係第一次睇到妳係度發表"esf既家長好多都係中等收入呀，家長d英文水平低呀，仔女d學校通告都未必識睇呀，自己都攪唔掂點樣去support小朋友讀IS呀!" 妳不停係度重覆呢d所謂既point但係呢d跟本係係妳自己 ...

丁家猫,
妳講得好

作者: CSJ安樂窩 時間: 08-1-2 13:51

大家好，
我睇左各位媽咪既諗法，有小小嘢想講：
首先，我都係cara2006所講既中產人仕，我媽媽不是中國人，不過我在香港出世，我都在香港讀傳統學校到小六先至去外國，我的小朋友係讀緊ESF，雖然，我可以afford比佢地讀其他IS，但我prefer將多餘的錢比佢地讀中文．

我想講的是覺得好奇怪，有好多媽咪比小朋友讀IS是想佢地有好的英語能力，或好似cara2006既睇法係大人英文唔好就唔應該比小朋友讀IS，如果想小朋友英文好，可以比佢地出去上Extra的英文補習，無需要讀IS，我本人將小朋友交比國際學校係因為我唔認同香港既教育system，我想小朋友可以開心學習，最主要是想佢地自己去發掘學習既樂趣，而唔想佢地只是等學校教佢地，我覺得依樣先係國際學校同傳統學校既分別

cara2006，
我好同意ESF收Kindergarten學生既system有小小問題，但有那一間學校是perfer呢？如果入到ESF，點解要花多餘的錢去讀其他IS

的確會有一些小朋友英文係比較一般，但如果你有一個好的英文environment比你的小朋友，我想你的小朋友唔會因為佢地朋友仔講broken English而英文變差，我自己就冇依個問題，我反而想我的小朋友學好中文．

CSJ

作者: MarcusD 時間: 08-1-3 09:30

原文章由 CSJ安樂窩 於 08-1-2 13:51 發表
將小朋友交比國際學校係因為我唔認同香港既教育system，我想小朋友可以開心學習，最主要是想佢地自己去發掘學習既樂趣，而唔想佢地只是等學校教佢地，我覺得依樣先係國際學校同傳統學校既分別
...

Yes! Totally agree!!

作者: bbmamimi 時間: 08-1-3 12:39

原文章由 MarcusD 於 08-1-3 09:30 發表

Yes! Totally agree!!:

作者: samanthavikki 時間: 08-1-3 14:48

丁家貓 得好說得對!~ 我非常同意呀!~

原文章由 丁家貓 於 08-1-1 16:26 發表
係呢個討論區內都唔係第一次睇到妳係度發表"esf既家長好多都係中等收入呀，家長d英文水平低呀，仔女d學校通告都未必識睇呀，自己都攪唔掂點樣去support小朋友讀IS呀!" 妳不停係度重覆呢d所謂既point但係呢d跟本係係妳自己 ...

作者: joyfung 時間: 08-1-3 15:50

謬誤: 外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園

女兒的esf 幼稚園只有不夠三分一的本地土生土長小朋友, 上午班有一班全班只有3個中國人. 現在她讀小學(CWBS), 她那班只有5個中國人(全班30人).

原文章由 Cara2006 於 07-12-30 10:24 發表
bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 ...

作者: catcatmom 時間: 08-1-6 20:31

我朋友係日本人,不過老公香港人, 佢讀青衣英基, 佢都同我講, 佢個女果班大部份係香港土生小朋友.可能間間英基中國人比例唔同!

我細b讀國際幼稚園, d家長都考曬英基, 考唔到英基就考其他好似ICS, 我個女係年尾出生,所以repeat k2, 出年先至考.

[ 本文章最後由 catcatmom 於 08-1-6 20:38 編輯 ]

作者: Yau_Cheung 時間: 08-1-6 21:53

原文章由 catcatmom 於 08-1-6 20:31 發表
我朋友係日本人,不過老公香港人, 佢讀青衣英基, 佢都同我講, 佢個女果班大部份係香港土生小朋友.可能間間英基中國人比例唔同!

我細b讀國際幼稚園, d家長都考曬英基, 考唔到英基就考其他好似ICS, 我個女係年尾出生, ...

hi catcatmom,

Do you mean your daughter born in Dec 2003? If she born in year 2003, she must apply ESF 2008/09 year 1. She can't apply 2009/10 year 1 as it will be rejected by the school.

[ 本文章最後由 Yau_Cheung 於 08-1-6 21:56 編輯 ]

作者: catcatmom 時間: 08-1-6 22:38

hi yau cheung

My daughter was born in Nov 2003, I let her to apply at the end of this year. But my husband like ICS as we live nearby the school. Just 5 minutes walk

原文章由 Yau_Cheung 於 08-1-6 21:53 發表

hi catcatmom,

Do you mean your daughter born in Dec 2003? If she born in year 2003, she must apply ESF 2008/09 year 1. She can't apply 2009/10 year 1 as it will be rejected by the school.

[ 本文章最後由 catcatmom 於 08-1-6 22:41 編輯 ]

作者: RAA 時間: 08-1-10 11:16

原文章由 丁家貓 於 08-1-1 16:26 發表
係呢個討論區內都唔係第一次睇到妳係度發表"esf既家長好多都係中等收入呀，家長d英文水平低呀，仔女d學校通告都未必識睇呀，自己都攪唔掂點樣去support小朋友讀IS呀!" 妳不停係度重覆呢d所謂既point但係呢d跟本係係妳自己根深柢固既偏見!

敢問妳的上幾代，甚至乎妳的祖父母可能係文盲字都唔識多隻都唔好講話教小朋友，咁佢地有冇送妳地父母去讀書？妳既父母又有冇送妳去學校讀書？
自己英文唔好就要d仔女跟妳條舊路行？英文唔夠好出去補習有乜問題？好多local school既學生都有出去補習中文啦，又有乜問題？

各位有意思比小朋友入esf既媽咪千祈唔好比d連打架同玩都未識分既人誤導。

.

各位有意思比小朋友入esf既媽咪千祈唔好比d連打架同玩都未識分既人誤導 >>> 係呀, cara2006 呢個笑話, 我自己都笑咗好耐.

cara2006, you're so poor

作者: RAA 時間: 08-1-10 11:37

原文章由 CSJ安樂窩 於 08-1-2 13:51 發表
我好同意ESF收Kindergarten學生既system有小小問題，但有那一間學校是perfer呢？如果入到ESF，點解要花多餘的錢去讀其他IS 的確會有一些小朋友英文係比較一般，但如果你有一個好的英文environment比你的小朋友，我想你的小朋友唔會因為佢地朋友仔講broken English而英文變差，我自己就冇依個問題，我反而想我的小朋友學好中文

我唔認同"ESF收Kindergarten學生既system有小小問題".

無論係本地/國際學校, 大, 中, 小學/幼稚園, 每一間學校都有佢地自己一套嘅收生標準.

例如有些本地教會學校, 如果考生係教徒, 都會納入優先範圍. 雖然我唔係教徒, 但我都唔覺得呢個係大問題. 你揀人, 人揀你唧, 既然唔符合學校收生要求/標準, 咁咪另作他選囉.

作者: puifun 時間: 08-1-10 12:49

原文章由 RAA 於 08-1-10 11:37 發表

我唔認同"ESF收Kindergarten學生既system有小小問題".

無論係本地/國際學校, 大, 中, 小學/幼稚園, 每一間學校都有佢地自己一套嘅收生標準.

例如有些本地教會學校, 如果考生係教徒, 都會納入優先範圍. 雖然我 ...

Totally Agree.

其他IS, 若果有幼稚園, 都係優先收番自己嘅幼稚園學生, 並不是只係ESF咁做, 大家要客觀及公平啲, 等於本地一條龍學校一樣

[ 本文章最後由 puifun 於 08-1-10 12:51 編輯 ]

作者: JennyL 時間: 08-1-10 16:20

What is fair and what is unfair?
I personally think it is fair enough.
I do not see why ESF schools cannot first reserve places for children in their own kindergartens. My knowledge is that, even if everyone in ESF kindergartens gets into an ESF primary school, there are still places for other children. Every year, there are lots of children from other kindergartens that enters ESF primary successfully.
Now, if you like ESF schools so much and want to be safe, just play by the rules and put your child in an ESF kindergarten. Then you yourself can also enjoy the priority status. Sounds fair now?
Oh, but of course, you said that ESF schools are no good, right? Then, good. Just do NOT let your child go to an ESF school. I am sure many other parents would be happy not to have you as a fellow parent.

In any case, can this you-know-who just stop it?
You have made your points. Many times in fact. I know you are not happy. But there is nothing we can do about it. We are just parents like you. If you are so upset, why don't you write directly to the ESF management? Or even better, the SCMP or Apple Daily? Go and talk to the press. Make it a big issue. Let people know there are unhappy parents like you. Go on. Do it now, elsewhere. Just leave us alone.

[ 本文章最後由 JennyL 於 08-1-10 16:29 編輯 ]

作者: QnA 時間: 08-1-11 00:56

原文章由 Cara2006 於 07-12-30 10:24 發表
bk 係 esf 的地盤，當然最多人會話 esf 好啦。
esf 小學的學生，主要都係本地土生土長的學生，因為佢地有一個 policy，係先收 esf 幼稚園學生，但 esf 幼稚園 9 成學生都係本地土生學生，外籍孩子都很少讀 esf 幼稚園，因此，基本上 ...

Cara2006, from below, seems you are very understand the esf's student, their parent and also the school. If you don't think esf is your target school, why you spent so many time and efforts to collect those information??? Some information looks need to have face to face interview with esf parents in order to get those information.

you really have so many time...why don't you spend those time with your kids? or understand more your kid's school????

-而新到香港的外籍孩子，...要等上一兩年才能插班。

-esf 學校 (尤其九龍區) 基本上 9 成係香港土生孩子。

-他們父母很多都學歷不高，英語水平差，部份更只是勉強應付學費，這類家庭家中的英語環境差；

-近年，好多 esf 孩子，家長本身知識水平英語水平都低，好多在家都幫唔到孩子學習，孩子去到三四年班，問題越是嚴重，學校亦會 "提醒"家長，孩子的英文唔好，被要求出去惡補英文。

-esf 亦有另一個包袱，就係唔可以好持本地名校咁，趕 d差的學生走，

-..竟然有大量英語差的學生，真係好匪夷所思。

-我知有 d 家長，完全唔理孩子的事，從來唔 show up參與孩子學校活動，亦唔會在家輔助孩子 reading，learning 等，當然，佢地亦從來唔上 bk，佢地的失敗 case，有幾多可以"傳" 到 bk？

-esf 家長當然唔會主動話你聽，衰 d 講，家醜不出外傳，知道有 d 差例子都唔會講。

作者: bbtung 時間: 08-1-11 14:31

有Ｄ ”有心人” 在ＢＫ係咁唱衰ESF School. 又化別名在其他 Forum繼續唱衰, 非常非常落力。我實在忍唔住都要講 , 這些
”有心人” 非常非常熟識 ESF Schools 的運作, 收生程序, 連 ESF kinder 入 P1 的情形都很清楚 , 要搜集這麽多資料真的很費心。但又話唔會考ESF School, 真的很奇怪。

會唔會有Ｄ人以為唱衰ESF School, 咁就小Ｄ人考, 甚至驚到收咗都唔讀, 請這
”有心人” 不要發此春秋大夢 , 你估揀得ESF School 的 parents 會是如此水平的嗎 ?

如果得的話 , 我想唱衰 Cambridge , 咁我就可以入到去讀了。

哈哈 !!

bbtung

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)