教育王國
標題: 赤柱St. Stephen vs 英華 [打印本頁]
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-11-25 15:53 標題: 赤柱St. Stephen vs 英華
雖然英華還未放榜, 但係如果二選一, 將會是一個難題...
儘量不以學費和地點去決定, 只用兩間學校對小朋友既學業, 語文基礎, 品德, 和學校生活作考慮, 你會要邊間?
作者: aa120520 時間: 09-11-25 16:04
SSCPS already register on Monday wor. So you have complete on 23/11?
作者: waiwaibaba 時間: 09-11-25 16:12
原帖由 fsforth 於 09-11-25 15:53 發表 
雖然英華還未放榜, 但係如果二選一, 將會是一個難題...
儘量不以學費和地點去決定, 只用兩間學校對小朋友既學業, 語文基礎, 品德, 和學校生活作考慮, 你會要邊間? ...
I think U should have all the info already. To my interest, I hope Ying Wah 'll accept yr son and U pick Ying Wah 
作者: 4in1family 時間: 09-11-25 18:39
樓主點睇? 2間都係好學校...
作者: LifeSharing 時間: 09-11-25 19:29
same situation to you. You have to choose one out of 4!
原帖由 4in1family 於 09-11-25 18:39 發表
樓主點睇? 2間都係好學校...
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 09-11-26 10:34
赤柱St. Stephen
作者: tracytang 時間: 09-11-26 10:44
Sure St. Stephen.
作者: VKwan 時間: 09-11-26 11:33
完全唔同style，點比呀？
我個人意見詐，冇煲貶之分。
我既思路係：現在你揀咩，將來會影響你個細路既為人&路向，所以我提議：
如果父母係理想主義型，而又有強大後盾($)，for將來出國讀書，咁就St Stephen啦。
如果將來個細路都係諗住扎根華人社會(唔等如唔出國讀書，我講係事業果part)，父母希望個細路奮力爭取型，充勁型，咁就英華啦。
但最終你都係參考在學家長意見好d。
作者: shirleyng5 時間: 09-11-26 12:22
一定係英華，男孩子讀男校比較理想，而且我較buy林校長的教育熱誠．
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 09-11-26 12:43
原帖由 shirleyng5 於 09-11-26 12:22 發表
一定係英華，男孩子讀男校比較理想，而且我較buy林校長的教育熱誠．
你比較下語文，課程和學生的視野，完全唔同層次。除了"遠"和"錢"之外，冇可能唔揀St. Stephen。
作者: hohoho2003 時間: 09-11-26 20:23
St. Stephen在香港區那邊DSS學校學費5萬多一年，但名氣地位成績比它高一大班的聖xx男女才是最好目標！富貴家長才精明，yw入學難度肯定要表現能力，並非比較家庭經濟能力，家長可以比比報教人數，就明困難度！
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-11-26 20:53
It is no need to compare and no points to compare different schools. Every school has its own fans.
I just observed that no matter the students or their parents of SSCPS are so good in various attributes (intelligence, academic and non- academic abilities, family background, etc...), they can enter most of subsidized schools if they want to. So why they still prefer to pay such high tuition fee if they need not to?
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-11-26 21:19 標題: 回覆 11# hohoho2003 的文章
我 prefer 校長有參與interview既學校, 而小朋友和家長要過三關先入到YW, 真係好難得, 慳番來既學費可以做好多其他野, 包括比個仔將來出國留學!
作者: childrenfirst 時間: 09-11-26 21:45
both are good schools and both competition is keen.
YW: 2222 for 150 seats
SSCPS: 1100 for 99 seats - if their location is not so remote, they should receive more applications.
作者: hohoho2003 時間: 09-11-26 22:57
St. Stephen1100個男女學生收99個對比2200男生收150只有dps可以等量！
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 09-11-27 09:33
原帖由 hohoho2003 於 09-11-26 22:57 發表
St. Stephen1100個男女學生收99個對比2200男生收150只有dps可以等量！
有幾多人報是沒有特別意思，陳守仁、培橋夠多人報，唔通佢地好過DBS, St. Stephen and YW?
重要係報的人的質素。我識好多人連DBS張form都唔敢攞添。
作者: hohoho2003 時間: 09-11-27 09:50
人數報讀一百幾拾是最精英，
課程
和學生的視野，完全唔同層次這一要求並不低，要最高才到達，
作者: ACACSC 時間: 09-11-27 10:06
I will pick YW since principal Lam is really good and pay a lot of attention to both the school and students.
Your child will have a happy and fruitful school life there. 3 times interviews are not just interview, but an understanding of where the child come from - what kind of family! So, your son's colleagues will be similar - meaning from the family with heart, care and focus to the child!
Just my own opinion...
作者: QQ818 時間: 09-11-27 11:10
2 間都真係唔同Style wor, St. Stephen 真係好多有錢仔女, 聽聞搞親B-day party 唔係在遊艇就係別墅wor. 如果負擔倒而又住o個頭, 又值得諗wor.
至於英華, 穩穩陣陣而偏上, 學費又合理, 可穩守12年, 又係一個good choice.
如兩間都收, 九龍人就緊係YW啦, 番學日日番, 無謂山長水遠啦, 有司機都係o甘話啦!!!
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 09-11-27 11:14
原帖由 QQ818 於 09-11-27 11:10 發表
2 間都真係唔同Style wor, St. Stephen 真係好多有錢仔女, 聽聞搞親B-day party 唔係在遊艇就係別墅wor. 如果負擔倒而又住o個頭, 又值得諗wor.
至於英華, 穩穩陣陣而偏上, 學費又合理, 可穩守12年, 又係一個good cho ...
有朋友個仔讀緊，有錢人係有，不過冇你講得咁誇張。大部份係能負擔得起學費的普通中產罷了。
作者: chan_wingyee 時間: 09-11-27 11:40
I took the bus to pay the deposit. And met other parents on the bus too. Of course, some parents will drive and they are rich. And I know some familes will also consider International School, in which the interview process hasn't start yet.
作者: VKwan 時間: 09-11-27 11:40
原帖由 fsforth 於 09-11-26 21:19 發表
我 prefer 校長有參與interview既學校, 而小朋友和家長要過三關先入到YW, 真係好難得, 慳番來既學費可以做好多其他野, 包括比個仔將來出國留學!
即使出得起呢筆學費家庭，都應該諗諗點洗可以更值得。
作者: VKwan 時間: 09-11-27 11:47
我識個朋友，仔女讀st stephen，佢既原因係覺得language好，但我完全體會唔到佢地點樣唔同層次喎，當然佢都好乖好有禮貌，但其實其他家教好既細路都係咁，唔覺有咩特別。
反而n年前識既一個男仔，讀呢間學校，個人又臭串又冇料，乜都得把口。
作者: Cherishvalue 時間: 09-11-27 11:57
我地老友个仔读紧SSCPS， 也知道有钱的人不少， 不过大部分都是能够负担学费的中产而已。
原帖由 jeremyphlam 於 09-11-27 11:14 發表
有朋友個仔讀緊，有錢人係有，不過冇你講得咁誇張。大部份係能負擔得起學費的普通中產罷了。
作者: good-boy 時間: 09-11-27 14:12
I have chosen St Stephen and I am also 中产. When I paid the deposit on 23/11, the other parents I seen and 'felt' were also normal 中产.
My thinking is:
Though the monthly fee is a bit high, but ~3 subjects were taught in English by native speakers and ~3 subjects were taught in Mandarin.
If I choose others but need to pay tutorial fees for Eng and Mandarin course outside, it is also expensive.
If I pay $5,500/month for 12 years and my kid can build up proficiency in Eng and Mandarin since childhood, I believe when he starts working say, at aged 30, he will have competitve edge to get a better jod with additional salary, say > $5,500/month for say 30 years.
I believe it is 'cost' in short-term but 'benefit' in long-term.
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 09-11-27 14:16
原帖由 good-boy 於 09-11-27 14:12 發表
I have chosen St Stephen and I am also 中产. When I paid the deposit on 23/11, the other parents I seen and 'felt' were also normal 中产.
My thinking is:
Though the monthly fee is a bit high, but ~ ...
Agree
YW couldn't provide such environment.
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-11-27 14:52
剛check YW 個web site, 原來無校車到香港島, 而且 8am 開始上堂, 林校長都有問過下我會點樣湊個仔番學, 除左父母小朋友interview 的表現外, 我有感覺佢會比priority 給住在校車cover 到既地區既學生
正如good-boy所說, 如果比左$5,500唔使自己再請人幫個仔補英文, 可能又真係值得入St. Stephen!
其實間間學校都有一些囂張又無料既學生, 自己識教就可以了
請問有無人知St. Stephen HKCEE 既成績, 14分以上有幾多%? YW最高記錄大既是70%
作者: ACACSC 時間: 09-11-27 14:56
Conclusion: if you live in Kowloon, YW; otherwise, St Stephen. Straight forward.
作者: 天下父母心 時間: 09-11-27 16:38
hi, good-boy,
good point.
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-12 17:03
講講下等多4日就知結果
作者: childrenfirst 時間: 09-12-12 18:24
the academic standard of YW may be more solid.
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-12 19:30
原帖由 childrenfirst 於 09-12-12 18:24 發表
the academic standard of YW may be more solid.
That's what I think...VALUE FOR MONEY!
過多幾日就知道有無機會慳番5千元一個月
作者: catcatmom 時間: 09-12-12 19:32
赤柱St. Stephen 過去會考成績一般, 英華同樣係津校時候好過佢, 而加轉左直資, 會好d掛!
記得年前有個男仔來公司見工, 係赤柱St. Stephen , 有d印象, 因聽聞佢係名校, 但男仔張cert就好差下.
當然傳統名校如男拔都有成績不理想. 不過, 讀d眾人認為既名校, 外面的人一定期望高過其他普通學校.
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-12 23:03
I have interviewed a graduate from SSC before. From my memory, his HKCEE result was not good (no full cert) but his verbal English was quite fluent and he was confident too.
On the other hand, I found some graduates from other schools, though with better HKCEE results, could not communicate properly in English.
[ 本帖最後由 ssspwong 於 09-12-12 23:07 編輯 ]
作者: appletree09 時間: 09-12-13 00:11
原帖由 ssspwong 於 09-12-12 23:03 發表
I have interviewed a graduate from SSC before. From my memory, his HKCEE result was not good (no full cert) but his verbal English was quite fluent and he was confident too.
On the other hand, I foun ...
Hi Hi,
At the end, Did you hire him? Will you consider their HKCEE results more than his written or verbal English? My Q&A hint that there is not any perfect school for every students. It all depends your children's characteristics. If you would like your children bcomes more outgoing and presentable, you should pick SSC..or else you should pick YWC. Good in academics does not mean he or she can communicate well. In these days, the communicative English has a declining trend for the past decade, especially from local universities........
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-13 11:27
I gave him second interview but also advised him to continue study if he could because he got potentials. Finally he did not show up.
原帖由 appletree09 於 09-12-13 00:11 發表
Hi Hi,
At the end, Did you hire him? Will you consider their HKCEE results more than his written or verbal English? My Q&A hint that there is not any perfect school for every students. It all depends ...
作者: cmchang0927 時間: 09-12-13 13:37
Just for your reference, my knowledge to SSCPS is not updated. I studied F.1 to F.3 in SSC 18 yrs ago. For the secondary school at that time, it's not academic strong.
Disadvantages:
1. Love Affairs - once there was a new yr of F.1 girls, the upper form guys would spot for the most beautiful one and stand outside of her classroom to know her. Then within a month of her F.1 life, she would have a bf already, v. funny!
2. Use of branded stuff - use of bold, Mduck and jean paul school bags, etc in our yrs.
3. HKCEE results not so good - my friend with 11 marks can get back to F.6 directly, cos' some more even got 8 marks can get back.
Advantages:
1. Very good environment! Similar to the environment I studied in UK after F.3.
2. Emphasizes music and sports
3. Have swimming lessons for PE.
4. Co Edu
5. Although HKCEE result overall was not good. But still have some good students. I have some friends who got into HKU Medicine, CU architecture finally. As I remember, the best result for my friends' year is 4A.
I think it has improved a lot after it was marginally classified as an Eng secondary school Sometimes, academic may not the best way that the kids show their talents. So it really depends on how yr kid is. For SSCPS, I m so sure your kid will have a happy life there. But if you are the parent that aiming for best public exam results, then DBS and YW, etc will be more suitable
作者: Chole 時間: 09-12-13 15:32
That’s what I copied from another thread”名校會考成績一覽”:
Quote
以是是我查到的2006年全港各區會考資料. 最近的資料暫時拿不到:
地區 學校 會考最佳六科平均分數
東區 張祝珊英文中學 22.8
庇理羅士女子中學 19.4
金文泰中學 18.4
香港中國婦女會中學 17
聖馬可中學 16.9
寶血女子中學 15.3
嘉諾撒書院 13.4
筲箕灣官立中學 11.5
灣仔 聖保祿中學 18.3
皇仁書院 17.4
聖保祿學校 17.1
嘉諾撒聖方濟各書院 16.7
瑪利曼中學 16
香港真光中學 15.4
何東中學 14.4
香港華仁書院 14.1
玫瑰崗學校 7
中西區 聖保羅男女中學 22.5
聖士提反女子中學 20.1
英皇書院 19.1
聖若瑟英文書院 18.8
英華女學校 16.8
聖類斯中學 16.6
聖嘉勒女書院 15.7
高主教書院 15.3
聖保羅書院 15
南區 嘉諾撒聖心書院 19.5
聖公會呂明才中學 18
香港真光書院 14.5
嘉諾撒培德書院 13.7
聖士提反書院 11.6
油尖旺 保良局莊啟程預科書院 21.4
拔萃女書院 20.3
嘉諾撒聖瑪利書院 19
循道中學 18.8
中華基督教會銘基書院 16.9
伊利沙伯中學 16.8
華仁書院（九龍） 16.7
真光女書院 15.2
深水土步 寶血會上智英文書院 20.1
長沙灣天主教英文中學 19.3
英華書院 18
中華基督教會銘賢書院 17.8
香島中學 17.3
瑪利諾神父教會學校 15.7
德雅中學 15
佛教大雄中學 13.6
聖母玫瑰書院 11.7
德貞女子中學 11.6
觀塘 聖言中學 21.5
觀塘官立中學 17.2
藍田聖保祿中學 16.7
聖傑靈女子中學 16
順利天主教中學 15
聖安當女書院 14.1
梁式芝書院 10.2
九龍城 拔萃男書院 22.2
喇沙書院 21.7
瑪利諾修院學校（中學部） 20.7
基督教女青年會丘佐榮中學 19.6
協恩中學 18.7
何文田官立中學 18.4
香港培正中學 17.9
旅港開平商會中學 17.3
民生書院 15.9
華英中學 15.7
九龍真光中學 15.6
東華三院黃笏南中學 14.9
香港培道中學 13.1
何明華會督銀禧中學 12.9
嘉諾撒聖家書院 12.2
迦密中學 12.1
黃大仙 保良局第一張永慶中學 22.5
可立中學（嗇色園主辦） 19.5
德望學校 17.4
中華基督教會協和書院 16.2
聖母書院 11.9
屯門 順德聯誼總會梁銶琚中學 21
保良局百周年李兆忠紀念中學 20.8
保良局董玉娣中學 17.9
南屯門官立中學 16.6
仁愛堂田家炳中學 16.6
屯門天主教中學 15.9
宣道中學 15.8
香港九龍塘基督教中華宣道會陳瑞芝紀念中學 14.1
to be continued......
[ 本帖最後由 Chole 於 09-12-13 15:36 編輯 ]
作者: Chole 時間: 09-12-13 15:37
cotinue
元朗 新界鄉議局元朗區中學 20.8
天主教崇德英文書院 20.6
元朗商會中學 20.5
趙聿修紀念中學 20.4
元朗信義中學 16.7
東華三院盧幹庭紀念中學 13.6
北區 香港道教聯合會鄧顯紀念中學 24.5
東華三院李嘉誠中學 21.3
東華三院甲寅年總理中學 19
田家炳中學 15.8
聖公會陳融中學 15.6
西貢 將軍澳官立中學 18.8
迦密主恩中學 16.9
沙田 沙田官立中學 20.4
保良局胡忠中學 20
恒生商學書院 19.5
聖公會曾肇添中學 19.3
沙田循道衛理中學 18.7
浸信會呂明才中學 18.4
沙田培英中學 18.3
聖母無玷聖心書院 17.2
五旬節林漢光中學 16.6
聖公會林裘謀中學 16.5
沙田蘇浙公學 16.3
樂善堂楊葛小琳中學 13.6
天主教郭得勝中學 13.6
聖羅撒書院 13
大埔 沐恩中學 19.4
聖公會莫壽增會督中學 19.3
王肇枝中學 18.6
迦密柏雨中學 17.7
救恩書院 16.2
恩主教書院 15.6
羅定邦中學 15.3
荃灣 荃灣公立何傳耀紀念中學 22.5
荃灣官立中學 17.9
可風中學（嗇色園主辦） 15.4
葵青 順德聯誼總會李兆基中學 19.6
中華傳道會安柱中學 18.6
聖公會林護紀念中學 17.7
東華三院伍若瑜夫人紀念中學 16.8
保祿六世書院 13.7
保良局八三年總理中學 13.6
天主教母佑會蕭明中學 13.5
佛教善德英文中學 12.3
皇仁舊生會中學 10.8
Unquote
I hope hui916 doesn’t mind me to copy the above info.
I know the public exam result is expected to improve with the change to DSS, but the past exam results of HKCEE does not inspire confidence (I assume there is no drastic change in terms of teachers and curriculum) and personally I am not willing to pay the high tuition and traveling expenses for this kind of standard.
For the primary section, a staff from a tuition centre told me that their Chinese level is not particularly high, but I am not sure what other schools she was comparing with.
No offence to those who love the school.
I am just very 孤寒 and would hope to save the money for other uses.
作者: childrenfirst 時間: 09-12-13 16:09
SSC changed the school principal in the last 2 years. The new principal should be better. In fact, I once read about their 2008 data, it was much better than the year 2006. However, I have forgotten the exact figures now.
Still, YW's academic maybe more solid.
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-13 16:46
原帖由 childrenfirst 於 09-12-13 16:09 發表
SSC changed the school principal in the last 2 years. The new principal should be better. In fact, I once read about their 2008 data, it was much better than the year 2006. However, I have forgotten t ...
Do you mean primary section? It had great increment in Band1 student %.
http://www.sscps.edu.hk/notice/08-09/Headmistressreport2008.pdf
I don't find any HKCEE report in SSC web site.
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-13 17:07
原帖由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-13 13:37 發表
Just for your reference, my knowledge to SSCPS is not updated. I studied F.1 to F.3 in SSC 18 yrs ago. For the secondary school at that time, it's not academic strong.
Disadvantages:
1. Love Aff ...
我所知的就是這樣, 不過, 盲目追明牌不一定是有錢人家的玩意, 窮的一樣會追. 而拍拖問題, 學校又有沙灘又有山, 風景優美, 根本就是拍拖的好地方! 不過, 現在資訊發達, 就算讀男校/女校也一樣會有機會拍拖.
很多香港學生都未能做到"outgoing and presentable in English", 成績好的也不少是"電車男"
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-13 17:31
You can check that the current principal of SSC is a very young lady. And, the faculty for its DSS section is different from the subsidized one. They employ more NET for lower forms. Not only the syllabuses, but only the batch of students are very different from the previous ones.
Although SSC is not my only option in the future, I won't benchmark the "new" SSC with YW, because I know the " expected values" I get from SSC are different from those that YW could give us.
(*I have no detailed knowledge about YW. I think it is a good school for many parents. )
Nevertheless, it is always parents' own decision for choosing schools for their children. No need to argue.
[ 本帖最後由 ssspwong 於 09-12-13 20:05 編輯 ]
作者: cmchang0927 時間: 09-12-13 22:40
And I forgot to mention that, 18 years ago, when I compared my school's atmosphere to Cheung Shuk Shan (I have some friends there), it was completely different.
CSS:
- no branded stuff
- students were v. innocent (no love affairs in lower forms)
- don't spend much time on Athletics and music
- teachers revised stuff with them frequently
So I really think that SSC is very different from the traditional schools. My friend is running a tutorial centre (she is an old girl of SSCPS and SSC from P.3 to F.7), she told me that the Eng standard of SSCPS now is high but the Chinese is not so good. Although the Eng standard is high, the expectaion of the teacher is not high. She has a student from SSCPS P.4 now. She told me that the marking of the homework is not harsh, still commented good when it was not so good........... but I think it's the style of foreign teaching. One thing can have 2 different views, u can say that it's good for the kids if you prefer your kid to have a happy learning environment. It's just what you want 
your kid to have.................
原帖由 fsforth 於 09-12-13 17:07 發表
我所知的就是這樣, 不過, 盲目追明牌不一定是有錢人家的玩意, 窮的一樣會追. 而拍拖問題, 學校又有沙灘又有山, 風景優美, 根本就是拍拖的好地方! 不過, 現在資訊發達, 就算讀男校/女校也一樣會有機會拍拖.
很多香 ...
[ 本帖最後由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-13 22:42 編輯 ]
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-14 09:13
原帖由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-13 22:40 發表
And I forgot to mention that, 18 years ago, when I compared my school's atmosphere to Cheung Shuk Shan (I have some friends there), it was completely different.
CSS:
- no branded stuff
- students were ...
不可能以地區名校來比較, 它們很多都是資源有限, 要在運動, 音樂等範疇去提升校譽, 難度很高, 不如"死谷爛谷", 搏公開試好成績, 成本低, 效益高, 保得住英中之餘又可以偶然有狀元見報, 對學生來講, 大部分都是來自普通收入的家庭(正如我自己小時一樣), 讀書只是唯一的出路, 運動音樂已經成為奢侈品, 成績 is a matter of survival!
對於其他傳統名校, 特別是學費貴的, 學生多來自中產以上家庭, 未必知道一無所有的壓力, 考試成績不好可以去外國, 有錢自然有書讀, 有一部分學生他們不是資質低, 而是沒有危機感, 所以成績也不會好.
對於SSC, 我會把它定位成為"有中文科的國際學校", 大家心目中的國際學校就是"貴\自由\English environment\重人權\creative\presentable"
英華小學也不算是傳統的學校, 活躍的小朋友也會有快樂的學校生活, 不過, 學校在學術上絕對是有要求, 成績有保證!
[ 本帖最後由 fsforth 於 09-12-14 09:15 編輯 ]
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-14 09:16
You reminded me that in my old years, Cheung Shuk Shan had been very famous for his high success rate for the two universities and it was very pushing . It seems that it is not as renown as before. Why?
原帖由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-13 22:40 發表
And I forgot to mention that, 18 years ago, when I compared my school's atmosphere to Cheung Shuk Shan (I have some friends there), it was completely different.
CSS:
- no branded stuff
- students were ...
作者: wootaitai 時間: 09-12-14 09:32
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cmchang0927 時間: 09-12-14 10:53
And there is an interesting phenomenon. The two friends of mine (studied in SSCPS from P.1 to F.7) preferred to send their kids to Kei Wan Primary school (much workloads) rather than SSCPS as they both live in Sai Wan Ho. They wanted their kids to have a more hardworking time. But for some friends that I know from Kei Wan, they claimed that they wouldn't let their kids to study in Kei Wan in the future cos' the high workload. I think parents always want the things that haven't been done well in their childhood to be corrected.
作者: dvb 時間: 09-12-14 11:27
原帖由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-14 10:53 發表
And there is an interesting phenomenon. The two friends of mine (studied in SSCPS from P.1 to F.7) preferred to send their kids to Kei Wan Primary school (much workloads) rather than SSCPS as they bo ...
This may be NATURAL.
1. people had a hard time when they had heavy loads in their childhood won't send their children to such harsh schools.
2. people could cope with the heavy loads will send their children to such harsh schools because they didn't feel any pressure before and they don't think it would be too harsh to their children.
3. people without heavy loads in their childhood may be attracted very much by the very good academic result of such harsh schools because they didn't experience any difficulties of heavy workload before.
4. people who had not experience heavy loads in their childhood and don't believe heavy loads will not send their children to such harsh schools.
[ 本帖最後由 dvb 於 09-12-14 11:29 編輯 ]
作者: childrenfirst 時間: 09-12-14 19:13
very true...
原帖由 cmchang0927 於 09-12-14 10:53 發表
And there is an interesting phenomenon. The two friends of mine (studied in SSCPS from P.1 to F.7) preferred to send their kids to Kei Wan Primary school (much workloads) rather than SSCPS as they bo ...
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-14 20:48
Sorry, I think you have oversimplified the situation.
I am a member belonged to Category II as you have mentioned, i.e. people who experienced heavy studyload and could cope with it.
However, my history does not affect my decision for choosing school for my child. I am a forward looking person that I know the important essence for success in the future would be very different from the past -- Acadeimic standard is only ONE of the factors for success, and it is even not the most crucial and decisive factors.
原帖由 dvb 於 09-12-14 11:27 發表
This may be NATURAL.
1. people had a hard time when they had heavy loads in their childhood won't send their children to such harsh schools.
2. people could cope with the heavy loads will send the ...
作者: dvb 時間: 09-12-14 21:02
原帖由 ssspwong 於 09-12-14 20:48 發表
Sorry, I think you have oversimplified the situation.
I am a member belonged to Category II as you have mentioned, i.e. people who experienced heavy studyload and could cope with it.
However, my h ...
Then, let me add one more category
5. people who experienced heavy studyload and could cope with it don't choose "harsh" school because they are forward looking people that know the important essence for success in the future would be very different from the past -- Acadeimic standard is only ONE of the factors for success, and it is even not the most crucial and decisive factors.
作者: ssspwong 時間: 09-12-14 21:53
OK. It is your model as you like it.
原帖由 dvb 於 09-12-14 21:02 發表
Then, let me add one more category
5. people who experienced heavy studyload and could cope with it don't choose "harsh" school because they are forward looking people that know the important essen ...
作者: appletree09 時間: 09-12-15 00:07
原帖由 ssspwong 於 09-12-14 21:53 發表
OK. It is your model as you like it.
Absolutely agreed with sspwong said academic is the not the only crucial criteria for the childen's life long learning life. How to cope with other people as well as having better communication skills are more important in these days. 
作者: fsforth 時間: 09-12-16 10:53
結果出了! 二選一, 95% 我會選英華而放棄SSCPS
我接觸過不少兩校的準家長, YW的比較可愛和平易近人.
而我還有一個細女要養, Value for money 絕對要consider...而且SSC個plan 係會加宿舍收海外生, 到時年年加學費, 月花過萬讀小學, 寧願留起來供個仔出國讀大學好過!
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |