教育王國

標題: SC Vs MS [打印本頁]

作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-13 16:14     標題: SC Vs MS

SC AM (ENG/PTH) Vs MS PM (ENG/PTH), which one will you choose?
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-13 18:22

Please help. My son is 0903 B. Unfortunately, Dad and Mum not from famous primary school and worry about P1 application....
作者: eebabyma    時間: 11-12-13 18:39     標題: 回復 2# fonghl2000 的帖子

我放棄左SC pm(無交留位費), 選左MS pm
作者: lukimama    時間: 11-12-13 20:14     標題: 回復 2# fonghl2000 的帖子

why would you choose SC before?



if you are afraid of P1 application, then choose MS.
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-13 21:32

My B now at SC PN, and love the school very much ...

Difficult decision ...
作者: fatty64    時間: 11-12-13 22:41

I got the same problem !!!
SC E/C PM & MS E/C AM~
for me, pm or am is not important for me , cos st cat k3 must be am ~ so not much difference

i m thinking if i want my son to study in ms ...for primary school...
its really a difficult question !!! Two schools are good~

ANYONE can help???
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-15 15:12

I actually attended MS playgroup with my son before. We found that the teachers are very nice but the english teachers are not NET (speak cantonese to the parents). Not sure if it is the case for K1 ...
作者: fatty64    時間: 11-12-15 16:57

K1 is NET!!!
作者: y3y    時間: 11-12-15 16:58     標題: 回復 6# fatty64 的帖子

I've same concern as u.........
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-15 17:12

From MS website: http://www.munsang.edu.hk/kindergarten_en/page.action?id=49

I see only 4 NET and 2 PTH teachers. Not sure how they are allocated to teach all classes!
作者: sumaggie101    時間: 11-12-15 17:18     標題: 回復 9# fonghl2000 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: renielo    時間: 11-12-15 22:18

原帖由 fonghl2000 於 11-12-15 17:12 發表
From MS website: http://www.munsang.edu.hk/kindergarten_en/page.action?id=49

I see only 4 NET and 2 PTH teachers. Not sure how they are allocated to teach all classes!


http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2345849&extra=page%3D1
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-15 22:25     標題: 回復 1# renielo 的帖子

Thank you!
作者: Jen2008    時間: 11-12-16 07:57     標題: 回復 7# fonghl2000 的帖子

from this year onwards, all K1 to K3 English classes will be taught by NET, I guess it will be the same next year.

by the way, whether you choose SC or MS is your personal choice.  Both are good choices.  

It used to say only 60 to 70% go to the primary (in EK), but actually most students get offers and eventually many people will go to subsidised or other private schools of their own choice. So the percentage varies from time to time.  So long as you are not among the worst in the class, you are quite safe.

If you have more than one kid, MS will be an advantage, I see many siblings get admitted.
作者: waiwai1234567    時間: 11-12-16 11:08

MS for sure
作者: JoSon0709    時間: 11-12-17 16:19

Sure MS la, 2011 KG ranking MS is no 4, high rank than SC now
作者: y3y    時間: 11-12-17 16:32

回復 JoSon0709 的帖子

Where to find the kinder ranking?
作者: JoSon0709    時間: 11-12-17 17:51

www.myschool.com
2011 kingergarten ranking
作者: JoSon0709    時間: 11-12-17 23:32

唔好意思比錯link
www.myschool.hk/2011_kindergarten_ranking.php

作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-18 17:26

It seems the way they rank is very funny wor...:

計算準則

2011年全港最受歡迎幼稚園排名榜是根據以下兩項客觀的數據計算得出:
1. 從2010年11月至2011年10月間,myschool.hk內全港幼稚園專頁的瀏覽量。
(佔總分的80%)
2. 直至2011年10月底,myschool.hk內全港幼稚園專頁被"讚"(like)的數量。
(佔總分的20%)
作者: y3y    時間: 11-12-18 22:52

It only shows the popularity but not the quality of school.
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-19 18:23

Right, not related quality at all...
作者: jkl5811v2    時間: 11-12-19 18:47

oops!  very biased ranking....  not really considering the quality of the school...
作者: waiwai1234567    時間: 11-12-20 01:26

i think this ranking is quite misleading
作者: sumaggie101    時間: 11-12-20 10:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fonghl2000    時間: 11-12-23 15:27

Anyone know for those MS K3 graduates, which Primary schools they go if they don't stay in MS P1?




歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5