教育王國

標題: St. Cat今年小一去私校、直資極差！ [打印本頁]

作者: 小K 時間: 11-12-16 12:18 標題: St. Cat今年小一去私校、直資極差！

Anyone can share? I heard from some mothers taking about this.

[ 本帖最後由小K 於 11-12-16 13:16 編輯 ]

作者: brima 時間: 11-12-16 12:26

派位極差??

Don't think start allocation, should be on June?

作者: 小曳人 時間: 11-12-16 12:34

我諗樓主嘅意思，係報私校/直資嘅offer唔好掛..
政府派位好唔好，又唔關學校事嘅~

作者: 我是一個爸 時間: 11-12-16 12:40

樓主究竟知唔知ST.cat 有幾多人呢？

作者: Ving 時間: 11-12-16 12:45

Is there any solid clues that St Cat primary allocation is not good at the moment or only rumour? How about about schools like KV or Victoria?

But I think even if there is drop in percentage to good school is normal as the no of applicants to DSS or private school has increased compared with last year. Every good primary school is in terms of thousand applicants for hundred seats.

作者: Ving 時間: 11-12-16 12:46

I am interested to know who will be the winner schools this year

作者: 小曳人 時間: 11-12-16 12:47

其實，SC年年都有一班成績好好嘅學生，亦有一班無乜offer嘅人，無乜咁特別，間間學校都係咁架啦~
唔好神化咗某d學校啦！

作者: ilj 時間: 11-12-16 12:51

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Ving 時間: 11-12-16 12:56

I think if you treat a good kinder as high admission rate to SPCC, DBS, DGS, then I would expect the admission rate to those school drop as more people mentioned before.

But one question is will those "elite schools" increase the number of seats due to more applicants? Not really sure whether the school management will do this or not in the coming few years.

作者: 開心小花 時間: 11-12-16 13:10

如果係考直資同私校, 真係唔係睇邊間學校. 父母的參與都好重要. 唔係話一入名幼, 父母就可以交晒俾學校.

作者: 小K 時間: 11-12-16 13:13

本帖最後由小K 於 14-10-30 17:08 編輯

Thanks

作者: Ving 時間: 11-12-16 13:14

But do you think St Cat is good or not if this year the school has good admission rate to "La Salle, St Joe, Wah Yan, MaryKnoll, MaryMount" but bad admission rate to "SPCC, DBS, DGS".

作者: hehe1016 時間: 11-12-16 13:23

I think you need to have more research on St. Cat Curriculum. St. Cat has assessment (exam) and revision (test), and the scheduled assessment result will reflect in the school report.

原帖由小K 於 11-12-16 13:13 發表
Sorry, 我打錯＂派位＂兩個字，令你們誤會，派位唔睇幼稚園！我意思係聽聞St. Cat出來的學生考私校不太理想，是否同佢係Happy school無測驗有關？

我現時係一個女讀緊幼稚園的媽媽，想多些了解你們選擇小學遇到的難題！ ...

作者: yiptszman10 時間: 11-12-16 13:23

我個仔讀 KV 都是得 one offer now (佢考左六間,有兩間未出 result)...

作者: joeyxlma 時間: 11-12-16 13:25

I don't think the admission is/will be too bad this year...

My girl is at K3 of St. Cat., quiet a lot of her classmates have 2nd interviews of popular schools (DG, TSL, YW, SFA, KTS, SPCC so on ... but of cox depends on which are the "good schools" u refer to). As far as those already released such as Good Hope, SFA, KTS, there are quite a number of my girl's classmates being accepted, and there are some schools (such as DG, APS) yet to release results.

[ 本帖最後由 joeyxlma 於 11-12-16 13:39 編輯 ]

作者: Era 時間: 11-12-16 13:25

如果係同Happy school無測驗有關既,咁就唔應該只止今年,而係年年都咁差啦.
申報:我唔知係咪差,我亦唔係ST CAT家長.

原帖由小K 於 11-12-16 13:13 發表
Sorry, 我打錯＂派位＂兩個字，令你們誤會，派位唔睇幼稚園！我意思係聽聞St. Cat出來的學生考私校不太理想，是否同佢係Happy school無測驗有關？

我現時係一個女讀緊幼稚園的媽媽，想多些了解你們選擇小學遇到的難題！ ...

作者: 小K 時間: 11-12-16 13:27

I guess St. Jo, Wah Yan, Maryknoll, MaryMount, La Salle, they are all 津小, no matter the kinder, they will not consider. But for other 私小，直資，not sure they still continue to like SC kinder student.
If they consider the interview performance rather than the kinder, I may prefer "one dragon" school. I just want to get more opinions from you guys. SC still many parents 1st preference on selection and this year around 7,000 applications for 2012-2013

作者: RoseInPink 時間: 11-12-16 13:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: isis_dad 時間: 11-12-16 13:34

另一種叫人唔好讀的方法

作者: Big-Mouth 時間: 11-12-16 13:36 標題: 回復 3# yiptszman10 的帖子

我個仔都係讀KV, 現有兩間offer, 其中一間係waiting轉offer(有寫信), 但我地都考左9間, 有3間未知。雖然學校教識小兒很多知識, 但我覺得家長配合很重要, 我睇過BK有位家長, 佢很用心教導, 她的女兒成功考獲多間私小和直資,因此我覺得自己做得不夠。

作者: w_y 時間: 11-12-16 13:37

以前出生率唔高, 入得SC KV 呢類所謂名幼, 家長一般比其他著重成績, 入直資私立比例自然高. 近年, 多得EK 和其他媒體, 出生人數又多, 個個都怕左大抽獎, 有理無理都去考左直私小至算, 其他幼稚園家長亦努力栽培子女一齊爭位, 名幼學生成功率自然低. 而且, 至巴閉果幾間名小學好似都未出結果, 未咁快可以定論.

名幼唔包生仔....贊成!! 好怕有家長入唔到某校就世界末日, 胡言亂語, 儀態盡失. (唔係話樓主, 只係有感而發)

作者: brima 時間: 11-12-16 14:00 標題: 回復 15# 小曳人的帖子

absolutely agree!!

作者: bb@wonderland 時間: 11-12-16 14:17

原帖由小K 於 11-12-16 12:18 發表
Anyone can share? I heard from some mothers taking about this.

如果你係想問SC現家長教小一直資或私校既怖情況,我建議你改一改你個post 既headings.

呢個heading是一個claim, 不是在問意見.
St. Cat今年小一去私校、直資極差！

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 11-12-16 14:23

原帖由 w_y 於 11-12-16 13:37 發表
以前出生率唔高, 入得SC KV 呢類所謂名幼, 家長一般比其他著重成績, 入直資私立比例自然高. 近年, 多得EK 和其他媒體, 出生人數又多, 個個都怕左大抽獎, 有理無理都去考左直私小至算, 其他幼稚園家長亦努力栽培子女 ...

咪係....有d考唔到心儀小學真係會發難架! 大佬呀, 考小學唔可以旨意哂幼稚園架麻, 問下自己咁耐以黎付出過d乜先? 唔係每個月比果幾千蚊學費就當付出左架!

作者: 小曳人 時間: 11-12-16 14:40

原帖由 RoseInPink 於 11-12-16 13:34 發表
I think it is rather hard to judge a kinder 's " standard" based on admission results.
I have the following supporting reasons:
1. It is a FACT that some kids are studying in 2 kindergartens, for example , GH am + SC pm,
hence if admitted to GH, does it mean that SC is a good school ?

GH舊年已經成日講話學校唔支持小朋友讀兩間學校，仲迫d家長盡快做決定
乜今年仲有人夠膽咁做咩？唔驚小學部唔收呀？！
仲有，SC係K2同K3返唔同am/pm嘅學校，咁樣返兩間好有難度！

作者: bigfatboy 時間: 11-12-16 14:43

Agree! 既然冇事實根據, 如果樓主真係想問意見, 唔該改咗呢個非常misleading 嘅標題!

原帖由 bb@wonderland 於 11-12-16 14:17 發表

如果你係想問SC現家長教小一直資或私校既怖情況,我建議你改一改你個post 既headings.

呢個heading是一個claim, 不是在問意見.
St. Cat今年小一去私校、直資極差！ ...

作者: cycream 時間: 11-12-16 14:48

st cath人咁多, "好多人"考得唔好, 有咩出奇! 開埋紅磡校, 3年後考小學果批, 仲會有"更多人"考得唔好啦!

我個仔而加讀st cath k1, 我都有諗3年後入唔到心儀既小學, 係我地做人父母既問題! 我都係返去努力幫個仔準備得好d, 唔想我個仔3年後成日st cath"好多人"考得唔好既其中一個, 有份整衰st cath個名.

作者: Jen2008 時間: 11-12-16 14:56 標題: 回復 3# 小曳人的帖子

I know a case. A girl is studying at both SC and Heep Yunn K3. She has an elder sister in upper Heep Yunn primary. It works out perfectly fine for her. It also works perfectly with Pui Ching and Munsang so long as there is no clash in K1.

作者: 仔仔錫錫你 時間: 11-12-16 15:01

好唔好見仁見智！上年有幾位SC小朋友分別考入培小，APS 及CKY, 佢地父母當時都係話考得唔好. 今年阿仔同學有高主教及st Jo offer 但無留位(最後決定大抽獎算了），一様同人講無offer.

但點都好,以前的SC 可以話一分錢一分貨，依家比1斤貨但要比斤半錢就有點貴了

作者: Furbymao 時間: 11-12-16 15:22

There is no magic even in St Catherine. Many of the children with good offer for primary one have strong support of parents, in terms of time, effort, money.

作者: sytw 時間: 11-12-16 15:34

幾時都係要講家校合作，如果諗住入到名幼就一定入到名小就實在太天真，幼稚園好都要家長肯附出配合，考小一又要講天時地利人和加luck，太多因素影響個賽果啦，況且st cat個case係每年咁多畢業生，你係唔同group既家長群收風已經會有唔同結果，我識既朋友當中有人有dg/db/cky 2nd in, kts/sfa/tsl offers，我覺得算唔差
(利益申報：我自己唔係st cat家長呀)

作者: share123 時間: 11-12-16 16:24

原帖由 Furbymao 於 11-12-16 15:22 發表
There is no magic even in St Catherine. Many of the children with good offer for primary one have strong support of parents, in terms of time, effort, money.

AGREE!

作者: ok_ko 時間: 11-12-16 16:41

原帖由 Jen2008 於 11-12-16 14:56 發表
I know a case. A girl is studying at both SC and Heep Yunn K3. She has an elder sister in upper Heep Yunn primary. It works out perfectly fine for her. It also works perfectly with Pui Ching and M ...

其實番兩間不同幼稚園的好與壞，已經在不同帖子廣泛討論過了。

SC K3是上午，而HY K3 是下午。時間上的確能配合。而且她姐姐還在HY就讀，基於現行派位制度，HY一定要收妹妹。你可能要問一問你的朋友為什麼在此情況下，加上HY考其他私小的成功率也不低，還要讓妹妹辛苦地在上午番SC？

作者: lovegirlslove 時間: 11-12-16 17:08

我認為除了一條龍幼稚園可保證入其小學之外, 其他所有名幼, 真係無可能保証小朋友一定考倒私小/直資架.

我小朋友都係讀屋企附近既幼稚園, 國際班, 唔係咩名幼, 但考8間都中4間.

作者: HaYi 時間: 11-12-16 20:59

不知樓主的好學校是否只是一線的 dgs / dbs / yw / sp-co 哩幾間, 但我估同考直資私立的同往年同其它的kinder都差不多. 我見識的 sc 小朋友一般都係考8-10 間 (包括2-3間一線, 其餘二線的), 現時每人至少己有4-5個offer在手 , 有 st.paul Co-ed 已收, 最叻個好似考約8間每間都有second in or 已收左, 好多女仔 (70% 我地識的) 有 dgs 2nd in, 因一級的如 dgs / dbs / yw 都未放, 加上抽的一日未知, 好多人都未決定最後去邊.

作者: BOBO_mummy 時間: 11-12-16 21:15

原帖由 Furbymao 於 11-12-16 15:22 發表
There is no magic even in St Catherine. Many of the children with good offer for primary one have strong support of parents, in terms of time, effort, money.

同意, 我仔仔St.Cat K.3, 最開心係由佢唔識英文到可以說英文句子。佢自己都有付出努力架。我自己放工就要同佢溫習架

我同亞仔報咗3間小學, 1間rejected,1間offer, 1間等緊result

作者: ew911 時間: 11-12-16 21:15

原帖由 isis_dad 於 11-12-16 13:34 發表
另一種叫人唔好讀的方法

又係想叫人放位的方法。

作者: babadogcat 時間: 11-12-16 21:19

呢個情況係任何學校都會出現, 而st cat因為係大校又相對出名大家就好似搵左佢做指標.

作者: newmommy 時間: 11-12-16 21:23

well. SC these years do not have comparative advantage since a lot of kindie such as KM, Think and traditional good kindie like KV do more and more 'training' to their students in all aspects.

Whether SC have a good admission rates to private or DSS depends really if you consider those schools (SFA, TSL, KTS, and not to mention the top tier schools such as DGJS, SPCC) are good, like someone said before.

作者: mttmtt 時間: 11-12-16 21:46

哈哈哈!! 我都有同感!! 年年都有D古古怪怪o既post! 不過樓主post 錯左地方!!

原帖由 isis_dad 於 11-12-16 13:34 發表
另一種叫人唔好讀的方法

作者: mttmtt 時間: 11-12-16 21:54

我大女都係其中一個, 有5間offers, 等緊DGJS下星期 result, 傢下好緊張!!

原帖由 HaYi 於 11-12-16 20:59 發表
不知樓主的好學校是否只是一線的 dgs / dbs / yw / sp-co 哩幾間, 但我估同考直資私立的同往年同其它的kinder都差不多. 我見識的 sc 小朋友一般都係考8-10 間 (包括2-3間一線, 其餘二線的), 現時每人至少己有4-5個 ...

作者: SCKnight 時間: 11-12-16 22:27

我又唔覺得St Cat今年小朋友考直資同私立小學好差噃。我小朋友身邊啲同學仔都不斷報捷。不過你一定要係SPCC，DBS，DGS先叫好咁就冇計喇！（況且都未公佈。）
讀St Cat唔一定包生仔，我識啲小朋友家長都谷到好恆。名小係冇免費午餐架！

作者: bnmr200 時間: 11-12-17 13:14

名幼係咁開分校，名小都係果幾間，重要轉小班，名小又自己開幼稚園，機會越來越少。

作者: hecabb 時間: 11-12-19 15:02

完全同意名幼唔係包生仔...我覺得父母同小朋友嘅efford先係最重要, 而sc係提供咗一個好好嘅學習環境比小朋友同有一個好完善嘅家校合作平台比家長, 可以比小朋友一個全面嘅教育.

由我呢兩年眼見, 出色嘅小朋友背後都有好努力嘅家長, 佢地考得好除咗係學校嘅功勞, 父母同小朋友嘅努力先係最重要~

作者: chickenwing2006 時間: 11-12-19 17:34

SCKnight 發表於 11-12-16 22:27
我又唔覺得St Cat今年小朋友考直資同私立小學好差噃。我小朋友身邊啲同學仔都不斷報捷。不過你一定要係SPCC ...

係呀, 我身邊都有 KV 同 SC 既朋友仔不斷報捷 ..... 我絕對相信除左學校以外, 小朋友本身+父母既付出同佢考到咩小學有直接關係 , 唔會只係入邊間 K 就決定既

作者: Christi 時間: 11-12-19 20:29

本帖最後由 Christi 於 11-12-19 20:33 編輯

deleted......due to not familiar with the new function here

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)