用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 學phonics應分辨k和c音嗎?
發新帖
樓主: LuckyFish
go

學phonics應分辨k和c音嗎? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
1#
發表於 15-7-11 08:21 |顯示全部帖子
LuckyFish 發表於 15-7-11 00:36
Thanks for all the reply.
想問吓你哋意見,個英藉導師咁教其實係咪反映咗佢教得hea呢?



  ...
比我揀西人net老師就要較生動和fun,或者你find out more abt ipa, 看看是否較meet 到你expectation, 唔建議和phonics一起學,免得混gnou, 到時兩頭唔到on , 棧搞

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
2#
發表於 15-7-11 17:03 |顯示全部帖子
sophie1997 發表於 15-7-11 16:23
說得好。香港父母實在太迷信phonics了。這也難怪,全球三大英語出版社投資那麼多在phonics教材,再加上連鎖 ...
Phonucs vs ipa, 長久以來都各有fans, serve different purposes.  有興趣可看看西人如何迷信phonics(Extracted from wiki) :
Phonics in the United Kingdom

There has been a resurgence in interest in synthetic phonics in recent years, particularly in the United Kingdom. The subject has been promoted by a cross-party group of Parliamentarians, particularly Nick Gibb MP. A recent report by the House of Commons Education and Skills Committee called for a review of the phonics content in the National Curriculum. The Department for Education and Skills since announced a review into early years reading, headed by Sir Jim Rose, formerly Her Majesty's Inspector and Director of Inspection for Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, UK.)

Jim Rose's group has now reported and the UK Government has decreed that synthetic phonics should be the method of choice for teaching reading in primary schools in England.[20]

The report does address the question of why children's reading and writing (especially for boys) have not been meeting expectations. Paragraph 3.25 of the Final Report states "This suggests that it is far more often the nature of the teaching than the nature of the child which determines success or failure in learning the 'basic' skills of reading and writing. This is not to say, however, that there is any lack of willingness or capability on the part of primary teachers to develop the required expertise in the teaching of beginner readers once convinced of the benefits to children of doing so. Rather, the main obstacles have been long-standing systemic confusion and conflicting views, especially about the teaching of phonics.[21] As more research and practice now converge in strong support of high-quality, systematic phonic work, schools can be confident that their investment in good-quality phonics training for teachers and in good systematic phonic programmes, whether commercial or provided by the National Strategies, will yield high returns for children."[20]

In November 2010, a government white paper contained plans to train all primary school teachers in phonics.[22]

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
3#
發表於 15-7-12 05:49 |顯示全部帖子
sophie1997 發表於 15-7-11 22:05
英國推崇synthetic phonics teaching 的是當政的保守黨,當中有沒有涉及個人利益不可得知。影子政府工黨一 ...
咁工黨唱反調都可能是for political reasons, who knows.  你inc 的文大致上和lelemammy 所說差不多. I dont disagree but the same also applies to ipa.  Anyway, 網上有endless for n against arguments, 有時間和興趣者自己google 和決定whats best for them.  

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
4#
發表於 15-7-14 12:01 |顯示全部帖子
本帖最後由 MrBeast 於 15-7-14 12:06 編輯
LuckyFish 發表於 15-7-14 11:21
其實佢到而家都仲係覺得k同c係唔同,仲教我分辨添。。。睇嚟我都要認真啲同佢一齊去探究先得



  ...

網友已解釋得很清楚和舉了很多例子,就算我這個不懂ipa的non ipa fans 都明,不如你講下有乜唔同和例子

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
5#
發表於 15-7-14 12:10 |顯示全部帖子
Ps, 小弟愚見,若那麼著重正確發音,ipa 真的會適合你些

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
6#
發表於 15-7-14 15:57 |顯示全部帖子
LuckyFish 發表於 15-7-14 12:50
就是網友講得好清楚,小朋友發問不應被忽略,所以我打算同佢一齊討論讓佢明白現階段可以當兩個發音係一樣囉 ...
好似網友之前列出的例子咁,又或者隻dvd 入面用過的例子。你小孩聽到有分別,咁你自己聽唔聽到有乜分別,又能將兩個音讀到出來呢?

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
7#
發表於 15-7-14 16:27 |顯示全部帖子
送首歌給大家輕鬆下:

http://youtu.be/M1777CQSO_0

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43230
8#
發表於 15-7-15 06:34 |顯示全部帖子
LuckyFish 發表於 15-7-14 21:19
我由此至終都是在問k和c的分別,然後講明我未學過phonics,再舉個例子我係連kat同cat都唔識分,而這個例子我 ...
咁你得到你想要的答案未呢?
‹ 上一主題|下一主題