用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 一線LS定係”二線”IS?
樓主: twoh
go

一線LS定係”二線”IS?   [複製鏈接]

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
41#
發表於 17-11-29 11:59 |顯示全部帖子
ZackMama 發表於 17-11-29 09:36
FYI, learning programming these days does not necessarily mean more screen time any more:

https://w ...

You need to quote a Kickstarter project to prove coding does not need screen time?   What serious coding doesn't need screen time?
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
42#
發表於 17-11-29 12:46 |顯示全部帖子
FattyDaddy 發表於 17-11-29 12:34
When I first learned coding in the late 70's, there was simply no screen. I would punch my program o ...

I can predict serious programming learning requires more screen time in the future, until there is something to replace LCD screens.  

I wonder why do Silicon Valley CEOs limit their kids access to computers and screen time.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
43#
發表於 17-11-29 13:07 |顯示全部帖子
RunningPig 發表於 17-11-29 09:08
本帖最後由 RunningPig 於 17-11-29 09:53 編輯

I am sure that good technical talents is one of the ...

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-11-29 13:11 編輯

even in the US, many many Indian are coming to the US through H1B to work in the tech industries, getting paid less than local US people.

In terms of success factors, no body really tell me what do they think is the most important success factors of Microsoft, Uber, DJI, Oracle, SAP? Do somebody here think they were successful because they hired some good programmers?

If you want to expand the meaning if programmers to mean computer scientists or "tech talents" like what you just mentioned, then it is another story.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
44#
發表於 17-11-29 13:08 |顯示全部帖子
FattyDaddy 發表於 17-11-29 12:58
Probably not for the reason you were thinking of. I doubt if any one of them thinks computers and sc ...

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-11-29 13:09 編輯

That was precisely what I was thinking of.   Not that screens are fundamentally bad.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
45#
發表於 17-11-29 13:38 |顯示全部帖子
1992英语baby 發表於 17-11-29 13:33
現在公認最成功的IT人是馬雲,馬化騰等. 背景都是LS沒有出國留學過.

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-11-29 13:52 編輯

有錢者。如果你的1T界成功準則只是錢,就可能正確。

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
46#
發表於 17-11-29 15:35 |顯示全部帖子
1992英语baby 發表於 17-11-29 13:50
每日幾億用戶使用,解決中國社會經濟發展困局.  引導中國大陸建立自家ecosystem .可以同美國IT巨企爭搶巿 ...

看看别國科技巨人做甚麽,大概念上照板煮碗做一個中國版本,不是甚麽非常了不起的事。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
47#
發表於 17-11-29 18:44 |顯示全部帖子
1992英语baby 發表於 17-11-29 17:07
以前LS無提供IB課程,但自從DBS,SPCC加入提供IB後.  IB成績分數平均已經高於所有香港的IS.  原因是LS 學生 ...

DBS和SPCC lB average 只比GSlS高少少,但GSIS 係全人類考lB。重有,DBS和SPCC係全港收最好的學生,IS 個學生pool ,可以選的學生細好多。

香港學生是考試專家,並不是秘密。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
48#
發表於 17-11-29 23:41 |顯示全部帖子
EconFather 發表於 17-11-29 23:34
簡單問一句,如果GSIS同CIS 呢d 一線發獎學金俾你小朋友,另一邊SPCC, DGS 或 DBS 神校又發獎學金,兩邊一 ...

一定有人要ls,有人要神校。

重要的是你自己 buy 邊一套。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
49#
發表於 17-11-30 13:48 |顯示全部帖子
RunningPig 發表於 17-11-30 08:41
咁又唔一定,只是兩邊的遊戲競爭方式不一樣,有人適合這邊,有人適合另一邊。我每年都有機會接觸兩邊的尖 ...

唔係喎,我識一個G記成績甚差的,學校又無乜迫佢咁,佢又繼續玩。相信神校一定一早「處理」左。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
50#
發表於 17-11-30 17:07 |顯示全部帖子
mandy_ng207 發表於 17-11-30 14:15
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子

呢個就係我唔鐘意今時今日「神校」的地方...

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-11-30 17:12 編輯

G記係極度自由的,唔使校服可見一班。佢地規則少,但執行認真。

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
51#
發表於 17-11-30 19:22 |顯示全部帖子
freespeech 發表於 17-11-30 17:08
我覺得大部份神校也是此情况。 由選科開始,只有尖子才有資格選,差的學生就求其畀一科你讀。跟着, 就是好 ...

選科的限制問題,不只神校,我知一普通直資,也諸多限制。照計直資資源好,無需要咁多限制。我看在其他官津也常見。

我十懷疑是另一種方法吸引學生勤力D。唔勤力成績差科都無得選。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
52#
發表於 17-12-1 01:43 |顯示全部帖子
1992英语baby 發表於 17-11-30 22:53
可能是資源分配問題,學校要保持高分公開試成績吸引本身已經高分學生入讀
...

間間學校也想高分,但是乎學校有否放學生利益在最前。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
53#
發表於 17-12-1 01:45 |顯示全部帖子
freespeech 發表於 17-11-30 23:22
是用來騙不懂的人!
大把人以為讀ib易入大學,當係水泡!
神校只比精英讀ib, 之後就標榜自己有幾多狀元。  ...

雖然好多lS比全人類考lB,亦都唔係無例外。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
54#
發表於 17-12-1 13:13 |顯示全部帖子
maomaofafa 發表於 17-11-30 23:36
你唔好話行入LS踩場
有些家長在IS圈子也直接踩邊間學校多大陸人
....但其實本身自己學校圈子裏也有大陸人

If someone judge another person by virtue of their birthplace it is textbook discrimination.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
55#
發表於 17-12-1 14:26 |顯示全部帖子
RunningPig 發表於 17-12-1 14:02
我不是説 GSIS 的學生特別有壓力,只是回應之前有人説嗰幾間較受歡迎的 IS 及 LS,LS 的壓力 "一定" 更大 ...

Fair comment.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
56#
發表於 17-12-1 18:39 |顯示全部帖子
funfun0209 發表於 17-12-1 15:33
Just curious, many IS explicitly state that they only take

No, an organization or government may "choose" to serve certain section of people.  That is a choice, not discrimination.

Someone choose to marry an old man, that is a choice, not discriminating young people.

A private Christian School chooses to serve 80% Christian, that is a choice.

someone rejects a woman for a job because of her gender only, it is discrimination.

xxxxxx

Another example, if I issue an advertisement saying a hire men only for a particular job, that is discrimination. if instead I did not specify a gender in my job advertisement, I interviewed 10 men and women and eventually choose to hire a men, that is NOT discrimination against women.

of course there are less clear cut cases but the broad principle is this.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
57#
發表於 17-12-1 20:25 |顯示全部帖子
shadeslayer 發表於 17-12-1 18:39
No, an organization or government may "choose" to serve certain section of people.  That is a choic ...

Coming back to mainland Chinese in schools.   Choosing a school with almost no mainland Chinese is a choice.

Saying you chose a school without mainland Chinese because you think they are all corrupt is discriminatory.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
58#
發表於 17-12-3 17:54 |顯示全部帖子
maomaofafa 發表於 17-12-3 17:13
因為有人會將佢哋同一啲大校比(如esf),就覺得佢哋的成績比較好,是一線。但其實如果收得越多人,當然資 ...

主要係學校如何收生,是ESF's non-selective vs GSIS's highly selective.   我看不應比較的原因在此。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
59#
發表於 17-12-3 20:21 |顯示全部帖子
RunningPig 發表於 17-12-3 16:49
香港在這方面又係幾滯後。當然仍有一兩科,如法律,去英國比美國好。

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-12-3 20:22 編輯

工程科學當然美國資源好,但文科如法律,歷史,政治,人文科,藝術,音樂,純科學研究,英國甚至歐洲也很好。

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
60#
發表於 17-12-3 20:25 |顯示全部帖子
maomaofafa 發表於 17-12-3 18:48
Agree esf non selective 收咁多人IB成績也不錯呀

所以兩間學校宗旨不同,不宜直接比較。
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題