maybe it's reflected by the banding of shcc? top scorers will have moved elsewhere according to the school's 升中去向 page... if that's the case I think it's fair where high flyers will land on in those top schools whereas the remaining ones will stay at where they should be.. they could be 1b.. 1c.. 2...etc...
sunflower2000 發表於 19-8-1 13:38
In take 照計唔差,入U率的確強差人意,問題出在哪裡?
exactly.. so it goes back to the original question.. this school has whatever it takes to be a top school but why the outcome is not consistent with the expectation...
yep.. 但個問題係為何聖心那麼催谷 但成績又不到st Mary 或其他較輕鬆學校呢?既然教快一年、半年,成績也不比輕鬆學校更好,那麼是什麼出現了問題呢?又,既然教快了但仍是1B,何不走輕鬆路線呢?there may not be answer for these questions but it's just something out of a mind....
dont get me wrong I didn't mean to say intensive approach will deliver good results / quality teaching.. what I'm trying to say is if it doesnt seem to achieve anything.. what's the whole point of teaching things in advance...