李光耀承認推行雙語教學政策錯誤

nintendo

口音, 唔係唔重要
不過讀, 寫, 理解, 甚至文法, 都比口音重要

PS. 唔好將 ACCENT 同 "讀音錯" 混淆

nintendo

口音, 唔係唔重要
不過讀, 寫, 理解, 甚至文法, 都比口音重要

PS. 唔好將 "口音" 同 "讀音錯" 混淆

[ 本帖最後由 nintendo 於 09-11-30 23:50 編輯 ]

nintendo

原帖由 thankful 於 09-11-30 22:02 發表
Sorry,  I am just a bit curious.  What in your view is even less important than accents?

"Accent" is already at the bottom of my "list".

What is your view?

nintendo

I would say that Singaporean and Indian accents are fine with me. May be it is that I have quite a lot of Singaporean and Indian friends since I was in high school.
At ordinary communication level, seldom would genuinely English speaking people complain about Singaporean, Indian, or Hong Kong accents.

Quite interesting to see that Hong Kongers are THAT concerned. Yet at the same time, not only do Hong Kongers do not have much better accents, we are also poor in respect of other English skills (eg grammar, pronounciations, the ability to express oneself properly, etc).

Funny isn't it...

nintendo

原帖由 papa_pop 於 09-11-21 12:32 發表
If not for the Singlish accent, I would say that most Singaporeans are truly bilingual...

Oooo...
You have pointed out something that Hong Kongers would never want to admit: Singaporeans have better English than Hong Kongers.

nintendo

原帖由 Avatar 於 09-12-15 17:20 發表
跟你分享一個真實故事。

認識一位土生土長現已達D6級之政府高級政務官(AO)，他一向自負中、英俱佳，即"聽"、"講"、"讀"及"寫"， 同時都能掌握至極高之水平。他所講的英語極之流利、寫的英文極之流暢及高水平，但當你聽清楚 ...

You are so easily provoked, aren't you? And you just love to give examples that in fact are giving up your identity.

我是路過的. 閃......

nintendo

原帖由 Avatar 於 09-12-16 12:09 發表
你只可說是你瞎猜，否則正如我回覆 iamfine 之論點，你犯了羅輯上的問題。

瞎猜?
我猜過 D 乜?

nintendo

原帖由 oooray 於 09-12-16 13:45 發表

漏了說nintendo也是高手之一。

在下只是路人丙, 剛剛路過搭下嘴

nintendo

原帖由 Avatar 於 09-12-16 16:05 發表
awah112,

可否專重別人的私隱，從報章上可清楚知道 Thomas 是那位。

請問那人有沒有在同一topic上用不同 nickname 互相攻擊或互相支持論點以誤導其他網友呢?

我自己從沒有這樣做，而我亦相信那人從沒有這樣做。


...

誰是 THOMAS ?
甚麼報章 ?
似乎在下對其他網友的認識, 真的比不上 09 年 12 月才來 BK 的 AVATAR.