最最....差既 ST+ST centre!!!

iam

唔好咁勞氣先。你知唔知佢係做咩test, 係咪Symbolic Play Test?

如果係做標準化評估，ST講咩，做咩都要跟足規距，事實上這不是training，所以不可有咩guidance比細路架。

你問清楚這是一個咩test先啦!

原帖由 ikebukuro 於 09-12-2 01:05 發表
I went to this ST centre for doing assessment by a ST. When doing assessment, the ST take some toys out, no demonstrate, no leading, just tell my son to show him how to play & no speech assessment. Si ...

iam

你pm我啦，我都想知哪一間。

如果係做標準化評估，不外乎係symbolic play test同埋Reynell等，我問係哪一個test，目的係想問你比的金錢係值唔值，因為ST因為要根據評估的要求來做test，同埋比到你一個分數（理解同表達的年歲），咁你比的錢先值囉。而且若做了標準化評估，起碼要隔大半年才可做同一個test，所以就算你谷氣，都唔好咁快找第二個ST做test囉。

現在市場上對ST好渴求，所以有好多green ST，我建議ｄ媽咪找ST時check check 佢地的資歷，特別是否用做小朋友的經驗，臨床經驗比只是一個學位更重要。

原帖由 ikebukuro 於 09-12-2 12:43 發表
Actually, the purpose for writing this post is: I don't want other mamas will waste their money at this speech therapy centre(it's shame of their behaviour for only commercial purpose, as they will te ...

iam

是否在YMT？定係在紅磡，銅鑼灣荃灣有分舖的集團？

我聽過YMT佢地以前每個禮拜係有1:1半小時training, PST, OT, ST輪流做，最近係呢度看到話做1:1要額外加$2000，wow, 寧願再出去buy 1:1 啦！

我估可能佢見做完assessment個result來judge卦。或者理解慢三個月，表達慢半年，先叫你唔駛做1:1 ST training.

原帖由 ikebukuro 於 09-12-3 00:56 發表
Thank you for your encouraging. I'm not angry for wasting my money, I'm disappointed of their "earing money method"!!!You told me it should usually have 3T at the intensive course, but I can answer u  ...

iam

http://www.speechtherapy.org.hk/search.php

你在這裡可找到香港私人執業的ST清單，但當然夾唔夾，技巧等就要試過先知。

你可以打電話問ST的資歷，esp有無做發展障礙幼兒的經驗，同埋佢full唔full，然後再作決定囉。老實說，在協康等機構做了多年以上的，都會對佢有ｄ信心的。

原帖由 owl_2046 於 09-12-3 11:13 發表
麻煩你PM比我知, 我都幫緊個仔搵ST, $真係唔易賺, 唔想浪費. Thanks!

iam

去LINKS一定sell OT架啦，因為LINKS係OT開的嘛。Joyful同 STEP的OT係打工的，Supervise Joyful的是PST, supervise STEP的是　Clin Psy,　（PST是校長），所以無咁focus入OT是唔奇。

如果你在Joyful及Step見了他們的OT，我估佢地都會叫你做OT囉。

原帖由 muimui5 於 09-12-16 13:00 發表
I think lokmanmama's discussion is quite true.

My daughter is not having any inidividual OT.  She just attends the all-round group training (Tue  4-6 pm) at Links.  At the first lesson, we were reque ...

iam

其實都要看你個小朋友情況

我個人覺得, 如果小朋友未返過學, PST 是很重要的, 可以訓練安坐, 專注, 溶入群體。PST 根本就是幼稚園老師出身的, 她們對主流及特殊need的小朋友的表現是很熟悉的, 可以比家長很多意見, esp小朋友可不可以入讀主流幼稚園, 她們是最明白的。老實說, therapists等都是大學grad後, 然後主力train有special need的小朋友, 佢地對一般小朋友的情況, esp幼稚園的教與學等, 一定無PST咁熟。

當然, 如果小朋友的語言, 大小肌與同齡等相差太遠, 真係要找therapists 幫手。但如小朋友好細, (below 2) , 都可先找PST, 因為佢地樣樣都識D, 係無therapists咁深入ge

至於個別training, or group training, 又要看小朋友情況, 記住, 個別的training是要幫助日後融入課堂學習的, 及輔助小朋友在群體學習中不能吸收的地方。所以, 應以個別為出發, 但目標就是要小朋友可以在課堂中學習囉。

所以, 是否要1:1 , 就是看小朋友與群體的差異是否大啦。

intensive group training (私人/政府 S位), 最主要是看小朋友可不可以從課堂中學習, 如小朋友的距離差好遠, 在群體中不能學習, 且又會阻礙其他小朋友學習, 當然要去S位啦。如果小朋友只係差少少, 政府service都唔會比S位, 而是I/E, 即是說小朋友可以從課堂中學習, 輔以1:1個別training而得囉。

你可以think about it 再作決定。

原帖由 ikebukuro 於 09-12-16 14:39 發表
or....., I'm sure you are right, when I called to each centre and said the situation of my son, different centre will have different advise: Joyful told me to have 1-1 pst, Links told me to have 1-1 o ...

iam

only OTs know the answer.

原帖由 ikebukuro 於 09-12-16 14:50 發表
How ot (in what way or what activities) to satisfy their sense of "front"? If they are always lack of this sense, do u think if we have ot training once a week  and this will be enough to satisfy thei ...