- 在線時間
- 1504 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-9-15
- 國民生產力
- 8798
- 附加生產力
- 33165
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 08-11-1
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 4484
- 主題
- 167
- 精華
- 1
- 積分
- 46447
- UID
- 226763
|
I am very much hesitated to put on this post but I am in the position to provide my own personal comments as a parent, on how we evaluate a school which is considered "suitable" for our children.
First, I must express my appreciation to the daughter of 澄心媽媽 for providing us such detail personal comments of SPCS. Congratulations for being a student at SPCS and I sincerely believe it is as excellent a school as you have described.
However, hope you don't mind but I would like to provide some support information for other parents to consider.
A direct comparison between a public/ government aided & a direct subsidized secondary school, basing on academic or English standard would be an unfair one. I am sure SPCS is a secondary school with a long history of high quality academic & English standard, and I am pretty sure no ones should deny it.
However, the issue here is that a DSS school administrates their own admission and the school itself has the right to choose EVERY SINGLE students to be admitted. Moreover, a DSS school would have much more freedom on their own curriculum and teaching style, while public/ government aided schools would be controlled by Education Bureau.
For the case of public/ government aided schools, they are only allowed to pick 30% of their overall admission. The remaining 70%, will be coming from their connected primary school (which are using CMI), and other students from Band 1 or even Band 2.
One point I must stress is the change of 5 bands to 3 bands, was intended to mix together better students with different level of academic standards. As a result, this is a common issue with ANY public/ government aided schools to have admitted students which would be in lower academic standard than they used to encountered. It is because students who used to be in Band 3 & 4, may be part of the current Band 2 nowadays.
So, please be fair and considerate to teachers of public/ government subsidized schools. For them to still manage 98.5% passing rate (according to your suggestion) in BPS, is a much much more difficult task than having 100% in SPCS. The key is the differences in quality of students being admitted. Thanks to their efforts and caring that have been given to the students to make them contribute to the society, and academic result is not the only consideration. Of course, the teachers in SPCS should also be honored with their efforts to keep a 100% passing rate, since it is also a very difficult task.
So, which school is better? As I mentioned in other threads before, there are really no need to compare for the purpose of which is better. It is because there will never be an absolute winner, and never should since all schools are different in various dimensions. As parents, we need to know what is best (most suitable) for our own children only.
So as the purpose of this thread, is to provide criteria to be considered during the comparison, but not to make a subjective suggestion of which one is necessarily better. All children are different, and the world would be too simple otherwise.
Ian
[ 本帖最後由 iantsang 於 09-3-15 20:54 編輯 ] |
|