- 在線時間
- 10 小時
- 最後登錄
- 15-7-27
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 75
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 09-10-8
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 72
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 147
- UID
- 548398
|
原帖由 武航 於 10-11-18 23:03 發表
報風較踏實的幾份大報都係指出同樣的3宗"罪",分別是買樓,招待內地校長及無公開招聘/無加薪給合約員工,那麼,其餘的指控 - 買股票,虛報赤字,起狗屋,亂加學費應與真道無關。
小弟不才,那是甚麼樣的"罪"?
net teachers,國內老師確 ...
My opinion is main point is NOT "辦學團體能否買物業似乎是關鍵吧!". Main accusement is "學校並非該三項物業的註冊業主,而是由校長和校監以個人名義註冊,以受託人身份持有物業". And "未經校董會審批". Then that will be a major problem. Main problem is black box operation without letting the parents and 校董 knows.
BTW, those are all according to the news reporting. Let's see how's the schoold response and clarification. Then see if you'll still believe the Principle. |
|