- 在線時間
- 52 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-9-26
- 國民生產力
- 1
- 附加生產力
- 2344
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-5-30
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 797
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 3142
- UID
- 752094
|
I understand your argument.
The candidates bearing 25 points may come from a population of 2000-3000 old boys/girls (either parent or siblings). I am still using wootaitai's figure. If nothing has been changed, there are 20 candidates having 25 marks entering to the school in each years. Obviously, there are candidates having 25 marks do not apply for that school with some reasons. A population of 2000-3000 people is quite big that if the mean of normal distribution of the # of candidates bearing of 25 marks generated by them is 20 people (let's say the mean is 20), it is quite difficult to have 30 candidates with 25 marks in next year except that the standard deviation is very big. However, if such deviation is big, an elite school should have successful candidates with 20 marks in past years.
True, it is not hard to find 30 candidates with 25 marks from 2000-3000 old boys/girls. However, obviously that there were reasons that not every old boys/girls take the priviledge. Otherwises, 20 points would have chance in the past.
The mean can be changed if there are incidents affecting the decision of the 2000-3000 old boys/girls.
原帖由 iantsang 於 11-8-4 16:09 發表
Agree that you have a point that many people are excluded automatically to ever receive 25 points or more. So the overall birth rate's effect may be less significant (but it is a trend in fact).
Let ...
[ 本帖最後由 ok_ko 於 11-8-4 17:26 編輯 ] |
|