用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 小一入學面試有筆試是否違反教局規定?
樓主: motherotk
go

小一入學面試有筆試是否違反教局規定? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


556
54#
發表於 10-11-3 19:35 |只看該作者
上年,SFA有考筆試,是我女兒說的,考成45MINS,又不讓考生用學校厠所,學校只提供臨時膠TOLIET,安排十分差,對這間學校十分反感.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5716
53#
發表於 10-11-3 18:44 |只看該作者
Can you elaborate:

1. whether all DSS/subvented schools are not practising it (if not all, can you give some examples?);

2. in what way are they not practising it?
原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-3 05:39 發表
P1 application process, I would like to point out those DSS or subvented schools who had  "embracing" the value of "loving" and "valuing children's development" have not really practising what they ha ...

Rank: 4


721
52#
發表於 10-11-3 17:47 |只看該作者
Oh really?? So surprise to heard that!!

Can you elaborate more as I heard that a lots of parents love this school, since mine is a girl, had not applied it, but in the future my little one may consider it, can you share more.....


原帖由 wanmum 於 10-11-3 17:20 發表

Agreed!  Ying Wa is an example.


1757
51#
發表於 10-11-3 17:20 |只看該作者
原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-3 05:39 發表
P1 application process, I would like to point out those DSS or subvented schools who had  "embracing" the value of "loving" and "valuing children's development" have not really practising what they ha ...

Agreed!  Ying Wa is an example.

Rank: 4


721
50#
發表於 10-11-3 17:14 |只看該作者
good points!!




原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-3 05:39 發表
P1 application process, I would like to point out those DSS or subvented schools who had  "embracing" the value of "loving" and "valuing children's development" have not really practising what they ha ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
49#
發表於 10-11-3 05:39 |只看該作者
P1 application process, I would like to point out those DSS or subvented schools who had  "embracing" the value of "loving" and "valuing children's development" have not really practising what they had "embraced" in their mission statements....

[ 本帖最後由 motherotk 於 10-11-3 06:42 編輯 ]

Rank: 8Rank: 8


19613
48#
發表於 10-11-3 00:04 |只看該作者
原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 01:57 發表
你個POINT 1已經大把學校做緊啦! - so is this right way to do??

Does not mean it is "right" or not violating the educational policy.

Even though I cannot change it by myself, I need to point it out.. ...


係唔係RIGHT WAY, D家長自己已經選擇了。唔鐘意/唔BUY佢咁做, 咪唔好考囉! 再者, 教署指引都唔係今年先出, 以往一直都有咁講, 但亦有學校咁做, 咁教署點解唔做野?
有時我地唔一定要去改變某D野, 而係自己去做出選擇。你要去讀DSS/PRIVATE, 咪要自己選鐘唔鐘意佢咁考你小朋友囉。如果唔鐘意, 咪等政府大抽獎囉, 又唔會冇書讀既。


89
47#
發表於 10-11-2 22:23 |只看該作者
I talked to the principal of my kid's kinder, which so call a famous one: The principal explain why the curriculum change these two years- to be more difficult-p1 level for k3 students- she said she is having pressure from other parents..

I found the curriculum "really" headache to me... That's not education, there's no principles....their teachers are good, they are forced or given pressure from their principal...

That's part of the reality!!


原帖由 ziyi 於 10-11-1 23:36 發表
其實大家有沒有想過不容許筆試的來源是什麼?

如果沒有記錯在教育局的文件上,對幼稚園的指引是K1不建議寫字的,是看,讀,認字,畫畫
在K2開始小量,很小量的
到K3才開始寫簡單的
原因是小朋友的手部肌肉未發肉建全,過早 ...

Rank: 4


721
46#
發表於 10-11-2 18:36 |只看該作者
support

原帖由 thomasha 於 10-11-2 02:00 發表
Maybe you should consider writing your comments to EDB so that the non-compliance can be identified and rectified.


89
45#
發表於 10-11-2 12:43 |只看該作者
Good question.....



原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 11:32 發表
So the point I raise here:

When DSS is subvented by the government, using the tax payer money... then why they are going to go to a trend to "elite" education while at the same time, they are saying  ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
44#
發表於 10-11-2 11:32 |只看該作者
So the point I raise here:

When DSS is subvented by the government, using the tax payer money... then why they are going to go to a trend to "elite" education while at the same time, they are saying that they are providing a "loving" and "happy learning" school environment for all kids, yet at the same time, excluding other kids that worth of receiving the educational opportunities where the "traditional elite schools" are doing the same thing for over years?

So why you have this DSS school setting up???  





原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 11:20 發表
Yes, of course, your point is very valid.

I heard that some school have video viewing and ask the kids to comprehend the stories in the video. So, it's not about story telling only, it's about comp ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
43#
發表於 10-11-2 11:20 |只看該作者
Yes, of course, your point is very valid.

I heard that some school have video viewing and ask the kids to comprehend the stories in the video. So, it's not about story telling only, it's about comprehension, listening, language expressions + they ask the kids to work on worksheets.

It involves many developmental issues there: 1) cognitive development; 2) organizing skills; 3) listening ability; 3) language development of long sentences; 4) fine motor skills on writing

That's too much for a general 5 year old, not for those gifted and outstanding of course!!

Some teachers from these school said to me that these interview designs were really "cruel" to the kids as from their perspectives. They said these are "crazy" exercises for the children - as from what they have said...


原帖由 Ewongmum 於 10-11-2 10:52 發表
Actually, it worries me that most of the school are examined the kids by story telling . Mine girl is shy and she cannot be too relaxed infront of strangers.  Even, she can do it , I know she cannot b ...

Rank: 4


955
42#
發表於 10-11-2 10:52 |只看該作者
Actually, it worries me that most of the school are examined the kids by story telling . Mine girl is shy and she cannot be too relaxed infront of strangers.  Even, she can do it , I know she cannot be as good as at home. But she is so good at acadamic.   She is more comfortable if you ask her to write it down and choose the correct answer.  I guess some school will use written cos, they need the correct candidtates be ready and prepared for their primary life.  In order to choose the right ones , they will use this format.

原帖由 fotk 於 10-11-2 09:55 發表
I agree with you that some kids are good at written test..
Ewong


89
41#
發表於 10-11-2 09:55 |只看該作者
I agree with you that some kids are good at written test..


原帖由 Ewongmum 於 10-11-2 08:41 發表
My girl is quite shy, and not too chatty . She actually would be better if you access her in written format.   in oral, she will be disadvantaged.   acadamically, she is very good.  

So, I agree, if  ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1212
40#
發表於 10-11-2 08:59 |只看該作者
如果你覺得學校有些規定或安排是你不認同, 那麼不要去面試好了.

希望大家搵到一間心儀和理念一致的學校而學校又可滿足你消費者的要求. 那麼學校校長老師都會十萬個多謝你的決定的

Rank: 4


955
39#
發表於 10-11-2 08:41 |只看該作者
My girl is quite shy, and not too chatty . She actually would be better if you access her in written format.   in oral, she will be disadvantaged.   acadamically, she is very good.  

So, I agree, if some private school will use written format to access their knowledge .   

原帖由 silvia_ng 於 10-11-1 21:36 發表


你個POINT 1已經大把學校做緊啦! 問你7-5=?, 係咪算問課本學問? 如果樓主你覺得你一人之力可以改變呢樣野, 實在係冇咩可能。再者, 有D家長仲好BUY學校可以考呢D, 佢地對小朋友學術上會比較仲有把握。

何必一定要 ...
Ewong

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
38#
發表於 10-11-2 02:57 |只看該作者
Not sure about Kowloon X Primary school??

原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 02:57 發表
Not sure about GT??
[/quote]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
37#
發表於 10-11-2 02:57 |只看該作者
Not sure about GT??


原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 02:56 發表
Not sure on SFX's most updated practice??
[/quote]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
36#
發表於 10-11-2 02:56 |只看該作者
Not sure on SFX's most updated practice??

原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 02:53 發表
Not sure PLK TXL will have written test at the second phrase of their P1 application??
[/quote]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2848
35#
發表於 10-11-2 02:53 |只看該作者
Not sure PLK TXL will have written test at the second phrase of their P1 application??

原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-2 02:44 發表
they do not have the written test as updated from their website...
[/quote]
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖