Harrow International - 國際學校

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

我的中心

教育王國 › 討論區 › 國際學校 › Harrow International

123 4 下一頁

樓主: mattsmum	go Harrow International [複製鏈接]

mattsmum

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3693

21^#

發表於 09-8-23 16:22 |只看該作者

回覆 7# eaymom 的文章

ESF's A/A* perceantage is arround 53%,

surprise to see that UK's league table shows 98% to 75% for similiar grade for the top 300 independant schools

返回頂部

wisekid2007

禁止訪問


	686

22^#

發表於 09-8-29 12:24 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

eaymom

洋房

Rank: 2


	70

23^#

發表於 09-8-30 06:37 |只看該作者

It is not surprising. Here is the A-Level and GCSE results from Wycombe Abbey, one of the top independent school in the UK.

A-Level

http://www.wycombeabbey.com/results/A_level_Results_102.php

GCSE

http://www.wycombeabbey.com/results/GCSE_Results_103.php

原帖由 mattsmum 於 09-8-23 16:22 發表
ESF's A/A* perceantage is arround 53%,

surprise to see that UK's league table shows 98% to 75% for similiar grade for the top 300 independant schools

返回頂部

mattsmum

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3693

24^#

發表於 09-8-30 12:08 |只看該作者

回覆 1# eaymom 的文章

GSIS's gce result is perhaps close to the top 10 of the list.

返回頂部

patriciatu

民房

Rank: 1


	15

25^#

發表於 09-8-30 12:52 |只看該作者

原帖由 mattsmum 於 09-8-30 12:08 發表
GSIS's gce result is perhaps close to the top 10 of the list.

How did you derive that?

返回頂部

mattsmum

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3693

26^#

發表於 09-8-30 23:42 |只看該作者

回覆 1# patriciatu 的文章

check here for the % of a and a* for both public and private school in UK:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/parentpower/league_tables.php

返回頂部

Reximom

禁止訪問


	706

27^#

發表於 09-8-31 10:09 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Cara2006

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2347

28^#

發表於 09-8-31 11:37 |只看該作者

原帖由 Reximom 於 09-8-31 10:09 發表

咁睇呢ESF既公開試平均成績都好水皮, 尤其是係人都知GCSE既試題俾HKCEE淺好多. 以咁既成績, 唔知道行英國學制既ESF係英國既話算係二流, 三流定幾多既學校呢?

不過ESF家長實話佢地D學生唔係”exam machine”嗎!
: ...

真係覺得你好勇
BK 係 ESF 地頭
你實比班 ESF fans 圍

返回頂部

thankful

禁止發言


	536

29^#

發表於 09-8-31 12:04 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Reximom

禁止訪問


	706

30^#

發表於 09-8-31 12:18 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Cara2006

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2347

31^#

發表於 09-8-31 12:38 |只看該作者

原帖由 thankful 於 09-8-31 12:04 發表

Reximom好勇?
真係勇佢就夠講自已小朋友就讀學校出, 大家比較. 佢講到ESF水準咁低, 大家都想知佢小朋友就讀學校有幾好. 講出, 等大家可以學野.
你都係一樣. 問極都唔肯講, 唔係唔見得人吧?
這樣做 ...

吾明你地係咩 logic.

即係要踢波叻, 先可以批評 soccer player ?

好, 就當我小朋友真係讀 band 3 學校, 又點 ?
同 ESF 水平有乜關係 ?

返回頂部

mattsmum

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3693

32^#

發表於 09-8-31 13:26 |只看該作者

回覆 5# Reximom 的文章

any school that did not screen students by their academic performance, much cheaper than any private school in uk, yet still have good univerisity enrollment . don't take the figures quoted as a criticism for ESF. if 2 A can lead to university entrance, why bother to make sacrifice for 12 years in order to get 4A?

[ 本帖最後由 mattsmum 於 09-9-3 09:08 編輯 ]

返回頂部

Cara2006

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2347

33^#

發表於 09-8-31 13:52 |只看該作者

原帖由 mattsmum 於 09-8-31 13:26 發表
any school that did not screen students by their academic performance, much cheaper than any private school in uk, yet still have over 70% univerisity enrollment is good.

So if money is an issue, I would say that ESF is still poor.
You pay that much for 12 years (when compared a lot others free local elite schools like Maryknoll and LS) and yet university enrollment is only 70%?
I do not get it.
Where do the 30% go?
We are talking about 30 students if there are a total of 100 graduating students per year.
That is a lot.
OMG, these do not get any offers from any universities? I am not even talking about Harvard, Cambridge or HKU. I am just talking ANY university.
Do not forget that with the financial background of the families, I am sure they can afford anything, from CC to universities.
Yet, still nothing for 30%?
Wow, that is totally horrible.

返回頂部

thankful

禁止發言


	536

34^#

發表於 09-8-31 14:05 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

thankful

禁止發言


	536

35^#

發表於 09-8-31 14:21 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Cara2006

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2347

36^#

發表於 09-8-31 16:18 |只看該作者

原帖由 thankful 於 09-8-31 14:21 發表
Of course, you are free to critize soccer players even though you don't know how to play soccer. It's just that what you say don't carry any weight. It's just like hearing a girl critizing in detail ...

You do seem to be so happy to "find out" my children are in a band 3 school.
Unfortunately, I was just saying so.
My kids are in a very good school, in fact, in an international school too.

My comments of ESF is of course very meaningful. I want parents to see the real picture.

The "outcome" or "results"of ESF is not good. I do not think the results is at all acceptable.

We are talking about GCE A level, which is known to be very easy. Yet ESF is not producing higher percentage of A students. And worse, only 70% can get university admission. More, we do not even know what universities the majority of this 70% go to. Of course, I am sure with the huge population of ESF graduates (5 or 6 secondary schools in total?) there must be some that get into very good universities. But what about the norm?

I can say that the graduating year results is hardly comparable to other international schools or local schools.

This information is not bad-mouthing. I am not bad mouthing. I am just repeating information provided by some other parent. Unless, you believe that this parents who provided the information is lying.

May be you would not be but I am sure many parents would be shocked to see the result of university admittance statistics of ESF schools. And their decision would definitely be affected by the university admittance statistics or A level results.

返回頂部

Reximom

禁止訪問


	706

37^#

發表於 09-8-31 16:51 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Cara2006

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2347

38^#

發表於 09-8-31 17:09 |只看該作者

原帖由 Reximom 於 09-8-31 16:51 發表

一個人係呢度有無發言權, 係基於佢子/女讀間咩級數既學校, 呢d咁既論點會唔會比較無聊左少少呢?

No.
Unless you are saying only positive things about ESF, then in fact no one is allowed to discuss about ESF.
I have seen a few other parents (from GSXS and SXS) 被 ESF PARENTS 圍.
We all know that both of these schools are definitely producing much better results than ESF.
But ESF parents never want to admit that other schools are better than them.
And they have this excuse of "cheaper fees" etc.