用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 滬江維多利亞學校 any comment of Victoria Primary?
樓主: ckbee
go

any comment of Victoria Primary? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 1


9
21#
發表於 09-10-28 13:06 |只看該作者
There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?
原帖由 samelsaho 於 09-10-1 00:29 發表
唔知怎樣講,太長篇了!

08/09年我認識比了按金的家長當中,有約8成放棄了學位,因考到其他學校學位(即使係二線學校),即係說家長只將VSA做back-up! ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


156
22#
發表於 09-10-31 14:14 |只看該作者
原帖由 poopooh 於 09-10-28 13:06 發表
There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?  


a boy living above my flat is from this primary school. he is very naughty and use foul language since he was still in victoria kinder. the parents are a middle class working couple, willing to pay the ralatively high school fee but apparently do not care about the kid's moral development. my overall impression about this primary school, by observing this boy and his parents, is extremely bad.

Rank: 1


9
23#
發表於 09-11-1 16:15 |只看該作者
Extreme case does not reprsent  the all. I think that is the beauty of statistics.
Being a guest teacher, I attended my daughter's class in few occassions ... there were about 20+ students. None of them was noted as ...so call" naughty". Every boys and girls were adorable and they could follow the rule one by one in asking questions.

That is the good experience for me ... that can share with you all.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2258
24#
發表於 09-11-27 14:00 |只看該作者
http://www.victoria.edu.hk/nursery-&-kindergarten/eng/nursery_20.html

2007-08共683名維幼畢業生,177人最後選讀VSA (25.9%);
2008-09共553名維幼畢業生,104人最後選讀VSA (18.8%)。

數字可反映VSA受歡迎度正下跌。為甚麼會下跌呢?  我相信消費者係精明既!

原帖由 poopooh 於 09-10-28 13:06 發表
There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?  

[ 本帖最後由 Yau_Cheung 於 09-11-27 14:04 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


114
25#
發表於 09-11-30 22:20 |只看該作者
跟左VSA 5年, 我開始見到IB既成效. 學生已經可以自己上網搵資料, 同自己既組員一起計劃, 分工合作, 完成group project. 仲可以寫到script 做個有板有眼既presentation. 家長一d都唔洗幫手. 呢d技巧全部都係書本上學唔到, 而係慢慢一年一年咁浸返黎. 真係好開心!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


171
26#
發表於 10-5-4 23:37 |只看該作者
原帖由 hoboy 於 09-11-30 22:20 發表
跟左VSA 5年, 我開始見到IB既成效. 學生已經可以自己上網搵資料, 同自己既組員一起計劃, 分工合作, 完成group project. 仲可以寫到script 做個有板有眼既presentation. 家長一d都唔洗幫手. 呢d技巧全部都係書本上學 ...


碎料咋 wor

Rank: 1


1
27#
發表於 10-5-14 23:24 |只看該作者
I think most of you are using only one example to represent the majority of VSA students, which is very unfair to those who perform very well. Also, I found it to be rather funny that someone actually believe students from popular schools do not speak foul language. The use of foul language is a part of adolence path. Thus, please do not blame the other students in influencing your child, think about why is your child so weak that he/she could not make the right choice. After all, teenagers are jus kids, you wouldn't expect adults to be perfect, then why would you expect kids to be perfect?
Come on, be fair...

Rank: 4


691
28#
發表於 10-6-9 12:28 |只看該作者
其實,2008年金融海嘯會唔會部份解釋得到2008-2009年數字下降的原因呢?  







原帖由 Yau_Cheung 於 09-11-27 14:00 發表
http://www.victoria.edu.hk/nursery-&-kindergarten/eng/nursery_20.html

2007-08共683名維幼畢業生,177人最後選讀VSA (25.9%);
2008-09共553名維幼畢業生,104人最後選讀VSA (18.8%)。

數字可反映VSA受歡迎度正下跌 ...

[ 本帖最後由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 16:04 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


691
29#
發表於 10-6-9 12:28 |只看該作者
deleted by user.

[ 本帖最後由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 12:29 編輯 ]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5500
30#
發表於 10-6-9 13:49 |只看該作者
The comments on VSA in BK has been hijacked by some users who apparently are not parents of VSA's students.  Whether their comment is geniuely made or not is always unclear to me.  I think those having an interest in this school should visit the school directly and see the truth.

The real reason why there is a big difference between these two academic years is because in 2007-08, the school offered a place to all applicants from the kindergarten.  As a result, they need to arrange 7 classses (instead of the usual 5 classess). In 2008-09, they screen students so as to maintain the usual 5 classes in a form.  This can be seen from the number of classes in each form, only P.2 (the 2007-08 case) has 7 classess whilst all others has 5 classes.



原帖由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 12:28 發表
2008年10月金融海嘯恒指10676,2009年3月匯豐跌到落$33;當時全世界0既人大家都睇唔通前景,銀行根本唔肯放數,盤生意賺緊錢都隨時比人call loan. 我相信當時的氣氛/背景絕對可以大部份解釋到2008-2009年數字下降的原因。

...

[ 本帖最後由 cherubic 於 10-6-9 13:59 編輯 ]

Rank: 2


95
31#
發表於 10-6-9 21:33 |只看該作者
P1 have 6 classes this year (2010-2011).

Rank: 3Rank: 3


247
32#
發表於 10-7-21 00:52 |只看該作者
我是維幼K2的家長, 我剛剛5月參觀完維小的全校assembly, 負責介紹我們的老師話會定期有assembly讓不同年級不同班別上台表演.  今次我們看到其中一個是一年級演講關於星球, 一半同學(10幾人)用流利的英文, 另一半用流利普通話介紹坐太空船到達不同的星球, 令我覺得嘆為觀止.  

語言真是維小的極大優點.  從尋找之中學習, 活學活用.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


413
33#
發表於 10-12-3 03:34 |只看該作者
VSA is just too far for my kid -.-

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4228
34#
發表於 11-9-5 21:38 |只看該作者
如果有小朋友o係幼稚園已經講粗口,我估唔係邊間幼稚園既問題,而係佢父母既問題!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


395
35#
發表於 12-2-4 23:35 |只看該作者
我覺得你們的意見都頗中立,想問問:
1.若果我的堂哥的家庭中文水平不錯,因為他們兩夫婦都是在高中的中國文學不錯,而堂哥是港人但用普通話教中文。根據之前看到的網頁D家長說學生的說聽英文好native,但寫就多grammer/spelling錯,是真嗎?是相比local school/ IS?
2.因堂哥沒請菲,老人家湊,不多說英文的,咁佢想小朋友將來說好D, 要寫得好,就趁學校功課不多,叫佢狂看圖書及寫下日記,是否OK呢?
3.是否全部英文科由鬼/ABC教呢?每日多少個鐘?課程是怎樣的?用什麼教材?
4.另外,看以上中文的課程/練習好似有好多保存中國文化的內容,好似不錯,不 知是否由小一開始?量多嗎?D小朋友說普通話OK嗎?小息時/EVENT,D學生用什麼話多?
5.有些人說小朋友讀到小三都不懂X/除數,又話2/3練習到學期尾都未做過,是真嗎?
6.若咁誇張,不明白為何這麼多人用這麼多錢讀。
7.若想小朋友在黃金時間練好三文兩語,之後想轉回LOCAL中上上的學校,為什麼難?怎可以容易D?若中上上的學校見其英普說得下,平時在家給小朋友練習,都應該不太差吧,咁樣是否容易在小四時LOCAL插班呢?還是在中學自行派位時選BAND2頭資助學校IN呢,因IN時好學校只看IN時的英文和對時事的認識呢?
問題較多,希望各位比多D意見,謝謝!!
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖