用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 CKY 收信啦
樓主: yymeme
go

CKY 收信啦 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 2


57
41#
發表於 10-1-20 10:56 |只看該作者
My friend's daughter has just entered P5 to CKY this year from other private primary school.  She said that her classmate’s academic is not good.
For example, my friend's daughter will get 90 marks for Dictation.
Other classmates will get 60 to 70 marks every time.
Additional, most classmates will use Cantonese to communicate.

Can other CKY's parents to share their experience?

[ 本帖最後由 ttbb 於 10-1-20 10:57 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3300
42#
發表於 10-1-20 11:25 |只看該作者
所講的情況可能真,又可能唔太真,唔敢講。每間學校都有成績優秀,亦有成績較遜的學生,看看你同邊個比。

另一則真人真事,有小四蔡繼有學生到大陸旅遊,同行有讀國際學校的學生,亦有本地學校的學生,蔡繼有學生可以以英語與國際學校學生交談,亦會以普通話與大陸學生交談,反之本地學生就變得沉默,再隔一、二天,本地學生終於忍不住要求他們以廣東話交談。隨時轉台是蔡繼有的特色,相信很多蔡繼有的家長都會深明此道。但話說回來,可能在小學時期,寫中文會比傳統學生較弱也說不定。

原帖由 ttbb 於 10-1-20 10:56 發表
My friend's daughter has just entered P5 to CKY this year from other private primary school.  She said that her classmate’s academic is not good.
For example, my friend's daughter will get 90 marks f ...


156
43#
發表於 10-1-20 16:55 |只看該作者
may i ask what's the reason that make you friend transfer her daughter from pps to CKY ??

原帖由 ttbb 於 10-1-20 10:56 發表
My friend's daughter has just entered P5 to CKY this year from other private primary school.  She said that her classmate’s academic is not good.
For example, my friend's daughter will get 90 marks f ...

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8048
44#
發表於 10-1-20 21:16 |只看該作者
熱門科系增收非聯招生

【本報訊】面對大學資助學額競爭激烈,本港高考生一般透過大學聯合招生辦法競爭大學學額,但本港不少院校近年逐漸增加經非聯招方法取錄學生的比例,由○四/○五學年不足兩成,增加至○八/○九學年的兩成六,人數亦增加逾千個,部分熱門學系的非聯招收生比例更超過五成。
對聯招生造成壓力
中文大學新聞與傳播學院學生刊物《大學線》最新一期報道指,本港不少學生透過非聯招方法,包括英國高考、國際文憑課程、本港以外學制的學歷、拔尖、校長推薦等方法申請入學,但這對經聯招辦法入學的學生造成一定壓力。

根據大學教育資助委員會的資料顯示,每年本港大學一年級的資助學額維持在一萬四千五百個左右,但近年聯招與非聯招的收生比例不斷改變。根據立法會文件顯示,○四至○八年間,經聯招入讀的人數維持在一萬一千多人,變化不大,但經非聯招入讀的比例則明顯上升,由○四/○五學年不足兩成,增加至○八/○九學年的兩成六,人數分別由不足三千增至四千多人。

此外,各院校各學系的收生比例參差,一些熱門學系更在聯招收生中,只取錄低於百分之三十的學生,其餘均來自非聯招,如○九學年中文大學環球商業學的收生總學額為十五人,但當中只有四人是經聯招取錄,僅佔總學額兩成七。相反,一些競爭較少的學系,則甚少取錄非聯招生,如中大人類學系、歷史學系等。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3300
45#
發表於 10-1-21 09:43 |只看該作者
Dear elizatyy,

Thanks for your info.  

原帖由 elizatyy 於 10-1-20 21:16 發表
熱門科系增收非聯招生

【本報訊】面對大學資助學額競爭激烈,本港高考生一般透過大學聯合招生辦法競爭大學學額,但本港不少院校近年逐漸增加經非聯招方法取錄學生的比例,由○四/○五學年不足兩成,增加至○八/○九學年的兩成 ...

Rank: 2


57
46#
發表於 10-1-23 17:27 |只看該作者
My friend's daughter studied traditional school and hope to a better envoirnment, so she changed to CKY.

Rank: 1


4
47#
發表於 10-1-24 23:51 |只看該作者
請問有幾多on waiting list 的朋友已收到CKY的電話?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
48#
發表於 10-1-25 10:37 |只看該作者
原帖由 elizatyy 於 10-1-20 21:16 發表
熱門科系增收非聯招生

【本報訊】面對大學資助學額競爭激烈,本港高考生一般透過大學聯合招生辦法競爭大學學額,但本港不少院校近年逐漸增加經非聯招方法取錄學生的比例,由○四/○五學年不足兩成,增加至○八/○九學年的兩成 ...


Thanks elizatyy for your information. :)

I guess the 立法會文件 is referring to the meeting record dd 27 May 2009 at http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr08-09/chinese/counmtg/hansard/cm0527-translate-c.pdf (see p. 51-52 for detailed stat. )

i m not sure if UGC has counted Early Admission Scheme (EAS) into JUPAS or Non-JUPAS.

but it seems that the newspaper itself has counted EAS into Non-JUPAS when  it mentioned that "九學年中文大學環球商業學的收生總學額為十五人,但當中只有四人是經聯招取錄,僅佔總學額兩成七。"
but according to FAQ from the Dept:
Q.1:你們預計大學聯招(JUPAS)及優先錄取計劃(EAS)各收多少人?
答: 課程名額共15人,從各渠道擇優錄取。在過去的四年裡,大學從優先錄取計劃錄取33人(55%),大學聯招24人(40%),非聯招3人(5%)。
(http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/globe/Big5/faq-big5.html#1)

given the seats are UGC-funded, it is quite likely that universities are required to maintain a certain percentage of intake from local students (or to a certain extend, students undergoing local public exam). no matter EAS is counted under JUPAS or non-JUPAS, students admitted thr EAS are local and gone thr HKCEE w/ promising results.  

with the phrasing out of HKCEE, there won't be any EAS after 2011. but whether universities in HK will adjust their admisssion ratio between JUPAS and Non-JUPAS will depend on:
-  the political issue between EDB, HKEAA and UGC, particularly the resources implication on NSS;
- the ongoing progress for universities to become more and more "globalized"

Rank: 3Rank: 3


128
49#
發表於 10-1-28 15:00 |只看該作者
Any advice on how to prepare my girl to CKY? What qualities of kids are CKY looking for?
Many thanks for your sharing.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


418
50#
發表於 10-1-28 17:55 |只看該作者
I think: 喜愛閱讀, 好奇愛探究, 主動發問及作答, 很多機會show & tell, 與人相處技巧....etc.,



原帖由 frogma 於 10-1-28 03:00 PM 發表
Any advice on how to prepare my girl to CKY? What qualities of kids are CKY looking for?
Many thanks for your sharing.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8048
51#
發表於 10-1-29 10:33 |只看該作者
原帖由 bakusensei 於 10-1-25 10:37 發表


Thanks elizatyy for your information. :)

I guess the 立法會文件 is referring to the meeting record dd 27 May 2009 at http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr08-09/chinese/counmtg/hansard/cm0527-translate-c.pdf ( ...


I have not thought about this in details...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3047
52#
發表於 10-2-15 22:56 |只看該作者
原帖由 bakusensei 於 10-1-25 10:37 發表


Thanks elizatyy for your information. :)

I guess the 立法會文件 is referring to the meeting record dd 27 May 2009 at http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr08-09/chinese/counmtg/hansard/cm0527-translate-c.pdf ( ...

bakusensei,
正如閣下引用的立法會文件http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr08-09/chinese/counmtg/hansard/cm0527-translate-c.pdf
(p.51)
教育局局長說︰
(二) 收生屬於院校的自主範疇,
政府不會干預。我們瞭解院校會充分考慮每位入學申請者個別的情況。




所以不會有收錄本地生優先的程況。大學收生實與本地中小學無異,就是「擇肥而噬」!
小學收生改大抽獎制後,名校紛紛轉直資,以其可完全控制收生也。

而據 elizatyy所引用的報道,熱門學系收取非聯招生較多。這正反映大學收生的方針。
由於IB對學生要求較高,某直資名校開辦IB,也聲言成績較佳的學生方會取錄。未來數年,本地IB生可能是精英生的代名詞,進入本地大學便不成問題了。
若大學真的受到壓力,要求他們收取一定比例本地生,CKY學生也不用擔心,他們也是100%本地生,且一直沒有任何資助(校舍地皮除外),更應有優先權(妄想症)。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
53#
發表於 10-2-16 00:31 |只看該作者
Penguin_chick,

Happy New Year and thanks for your sharing :)

原帖由 penguin_chick 於 10-2-15 22:56 發表

未來數年,本地IB生可能是精英生的代名詞


starting from 1992 when many top tier students in "traditional-elite" schools transferred to Li Po Chun after HKCEE, 本地IB生是精英生的代名詞"

but whether they are interested in local universities is another issue. you may be interested in the sharing of a CU girl at http://www.com.cuhk.edu.hk/ubeat/070478/ib.html


mindful that unless IBP is considered under JUPAS, IBP kids targeting local universities will need to compete with kids from GCE AL, kids already graduated in overseas universities (in medicine program)...........

competing with kids taking GCE AL may not be a "fair deal" as GCE AL is not so difficult. u may wish to see a study comparing HKAL to GCE AL at
http://www.britishcouncil.org/eumd-hongkong-naric_briefing_note_29nov07.pdf

Last summer, there was a news in Times about some UK kids previously having excellent GCSE results got rather bad results in IBP and blamed the UK high schools not “well prepared” enough to operate IBP (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article6735896.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1). You may be particularly interested in the comment regarding the gap between GCE A level and IB admissions criteria under the UCAS conversion table.
http://www.ucas.ac.uk/students/ucas_tariff/tarifftables/

Similar “gap” happened in the US system. Most US and Canada universities will grant advanced placement and credit recognition for kids taking Advanced Placement Exam (AP). Quite a no. also having similar treatment on kids taking IBP, but the “grade to gain the advanced placement” in AP is somehow easier than IBP.

No doubt IBP is being widely recognized all over the world. But whether the recognition is “on par” with the local public exam  in that particular country is another issue.

[ 本帖最後由 bakusensei 於 10-2-16 00:50 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


286
54#
發表於 10-2-17 10:47 |只看該作者
I'm not sure if I get it right - what bakusensei meant is that IB is a much difficult exam (to score well as compared to GCE-AL or AP); whilst there's no problem with IB in itself but the u-admissions system is likely to put students taking IB at a disadvantage.  That may also be the reason why the elite schools are hinting that the IB is primarily meant for top-tier students.  
Thanks for the reminder.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3047
55#
發表於 10-2-17 12:42 |只看該作者
GCE AL OL 較易取得高 grade,起碼已有三十年歷史,近年更有 GCE AL A grade 氾濫的報導,大學收生負責人不會不知,亦應有所調節。
IB初登陸香港時,的確受到本地大學的忽略,但近年已有改善,在本地名校陸續開辦IB後,未來數年會是過度期,大學應會越來越看重IB。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
56#
發表於 10-2-19 16:20 |只看該作者
On searching sth related to premise allocation, I accidentially came across the panel paper re. funding for CKY's site. [http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/ed/papers/edcb2-724-1-e.pdf]

Apart from the financial figures, u mums may be interested in how the former EMB praised CKY.

“5. The proposed through-train school in Sham Shui Po will provide students with the opportunity of continuous progression in learning through their school years from ages 5 to 18. The proposed school will run a self-designed curriculum with an international dimension for both the primary and secondary sections. The curriculum for the primary section focuses on fostering a positive attitude towards learning and developing basic learning skills. As for the secondary section, the programme is enquiry-based with emphasis on positive education, critical and creative thinking, with International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) as an exit point.

6. The pre-university diploma programme succeeding secondary education offers a comprehensive two-year curriculum that generally prepares students to fulfill requirements of various national education systems. Subject to the authorization by International Baccalaureate Organisation, the curriculum of the pre-university levels will be based on the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme that is expanding rapidly around the world
.
7. The proposed school promotes bilingual education. Although English will be used as the medium for teaching and learning for the major subjects, the curriculum will put a strong emphasis on Chinese language (Putonghua) and moral education. Capitalising on its rich experience in school operation in Hong Kong, the school sponsor will continue to promote co-curriculum activities and students will be expected to pursue languages, mathematics, humanities, science and the arts at all levels.

8. Since the school will be recruiting students from all over the territory and operating on a self-financing basis, its operation should only have a marginal impact, if any, on the supply and demand balance of public sector school places in Sham Shui Po District. The school is expected to provide an alternative for parents wishing to enrol their children in private international schools. This would also have the side effect of freeing up places in the international schools where supply is tight.”

Rank: 3Rank: 3


238
57#
發表於 10-2-19 17:47 |只看該作者
原帖由 rhythmwawa 於 10-1-14 11:11 發表
讀IB並不等如不能在本港大學升學, 其實每年本地大學亦有學位給與修讀非A-Level的本地學生, 而且有部份教授亦提出這類學生上課時較主動, 語文的聽﹑寫及閱讀的能力都高, 相對一些受12年填鴨式教育長大的本地學生, 一有 ...


就算讀IB課程的同學程度較高, 語文能力較強, 但在現時的制度下, IB同學只能透過"非聯招"這途徑入讀本地大學.

睇番樓上分享的數據, 去年入讀香港大學的同學, 只有15%-20%是透過"非聯招", 但唔好忘記, 這15%-20%是要和全球學生同時競爭, 當中包括全中國和東南亞等地, 仲有本地多間國際學校.......競爭是非常大的.

所以我覺得如果讀IB課程但target本地大學的話, 條路唔易行.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3047
58#
發表於 10-2-24 22:35 |只看該作者
總之條條大路通羅馬,培養好走路習慣,自然走得快、走得遠、走得開心﹔如果自幼被人推著走,即使走得快、走得遠、也不會開心。一但推力消失,便不再願意走下去了!

Rank: 4


803
59#
發表於 10-2-24 22:44 |只看該作者
Agreed

原帖由 penguin_chick 於 10-2-24 22:35 發表
總之條條大路通羅馬,培養好走路習慣,自然走得快、走得遠、走得開心﹔如果自幼被人推著走,即使走得快、走得遠、也不會開心。一但推力消失,便不再願意走下去了! ...
‹ 上一主題|下一主題