- 在線時間
- 131 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-9-2
- 國民生產力
- 45
- 附加生產力
- 242
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-1-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 800
- 主題
- 12
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1087
- UID
- 121069
 
|
My elder daughter studied in Vic, and my younger daughter studied in TT before.
For Vic, I was a little bit disappointed towards the language environment, but I think the teachers are very kind and with good standard of understanding children.
Vic is such a school highly respect the choice of children.
Even though they provide two teachers (including one NET) in the class, however, based on the experience of my child, they usually seperate the children into two groups, each group of children follow one teacher, and the two teachers arrange different activities at the same time.
My child had the choice to choose which kind of activities and which teacher she would like to follow.
Such that, during the parent's day, the NET told me that my child rarely followed her group, and thus she had not much idea about the ability of English of my child.
And to my observation, I did not found my child had improved her ability nor even interest towards English during her year in Vic.
For TT, they had a better arrangement, they organized the activities with one NET in charge of the whole class at one time, supported with an assistant to control the atmosphere.
Thus, every child had the same chance and same time of explosure to Eng and PTH environment.
Although TT also allows children to choose the activities they like better, however, the language environment was "fixed", so my younger daughter at least learned some Eng and PTH.
Every coin has two sides, since the teacher had to handle a big group, the personal contact time with child was less than that of Vin, and I found the relationship of teacher-child is less warm and intimate than that of Vic.
[ 本帖最後由 yaulinda 於 11-2-2 10:03 編輯 ] |
|
發表於 11-1-28 21:11
