用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 蔡繼有展望很好
樓主: TaoTaoMa
go

蔡繼有展望很好 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 2


38
21#
發表於 08-11-13 10:13 |只看該作者
dont worry too much! cos when our children grow up, hk education system may change more than 10 times! so the advantage of ib is that it seems not change in the future! haha!
cky is a school for those parents include me feel disapointed with hk govt and hk ed system!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
22#
發表於 08-11-13 10:55 |只看該作者
I don't think the univesrity admission requirements are going to change a lot, and they will still be based heavily on public examination results, whether we like it or not.  So unless we know for sure that we will have enough resources for our children to go to universities overseas, they are still bound to the same old game rules - good public exam grades, good university places.  

原帖由 ryanyui 於 08-11-13 10:13 發表
dont worry too much! cos when our children grow up, hk education system may change more than 10 times! so the advantage of ib is that it seems not change in the future! haha!
cky is a school for thos ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-11-13 10:57 編輯 ]

Rank: 2


38
23#
發表於 08-11-13 11:16 |只看該作者
we are talking 10 years later wow!
10 years! maybe china exam can enter hku, ib can enter cu, india exam can enter city u, russia exam can enter bu!!

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-11-13 10:55 發表
I don't think the univesrity admission requirements are going to change a lot, and they will still be based heavily on public examination results, whether we like it or not.  So unless we know for sur ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
24#
發表於 08-11-13 11:29 |只看該作者
No kidding.  What's happening today regarding university admission is not very different from 10 or 20 years ago, except that there are more universities.   The public exam formats may change, the secondary system may change, but you still need good grades to go to the brand-name universities or popular university majors.  In addition, unversities in hk are and will still be government-subsidized ten years from now, and the majority of their students will still be admitted through local public exams.      

原帖由 ryanyui 於 08-11-13 11:16 發表
we are talking 10 years later wow!
10 years! maybe china exam can enter hku, ib can enter cu, india exam can enter city u, russia exam can enter bu!!

Rank: 2


38
25#
發表於 08-11-13 11:37 |只看該作者
the majority of their students will still be admitted through local public exams.
this sentence not sure la!

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-11-13 11:29 發表
No kidding.  What's happening today regarding university admission is not very different from 10 or 20 years ago, except that there are more universities.   The public exam formats may change, the sec ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
26#
發表於 08-11-13 12:47 |只看該作者
Well,  I give up.  I sincerely hope that CKY will prepare students well for unversity admission both locally and overseas.  We may end up sending our son to this school some years later!  

原帖由 ryanyui 於 08-11-13 11:37 發表
the majority of their students will still be admitted through local public exams.
this sentence not sure la!

Rank: 2


78
27#
發表於 08-11-13 18:24 |只看該作者
(IB)一個外國認可的考試,我覺得不論10年後,香港的大學會預留多少的學位給些學生,但我們不得不承認,現今香港的教育制度是非常失敗,朝令夕改,無所適從(會考竟然問『屈機』),我希望送我的小朋友到蔡繼有這些學校,完全沒有做白老鼠的感覺,相反,任由小朋友就現今的教育制度照單全收,父母與小朋友都一定要付出很大很大的努力,並且承擔極大的壓力,才能有機會踏入香港幾間名大學,這條路絕對不容易行!我相信政府係明白嘅,但根深蒂固的官僚制度,那個高官敢一刀切在教育制度上大改…但佢地又肯俾咁多錢去支助蔡繼有這些『優質學校』,所以我才覺得他的展望很好,至少在同類型的學校中,我估他應該是最好的!最後值得一提係,SPCC同DBS都會有IB試的選擇,傳統名校,我相信他們亦不會浪費資源投資在一班在香港沒有競爭力上香港大學的學生上,對嗎?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


296
28#
發表於 08-11-13 22:03 |只看該作者
Totally agree with you.

原帖由 TaoTaoMa 於 08-11-13 18:24 發表
(IB)一個外國認可的考試,我覺得不論10年後,香港的大學會預留多少的學位給些學生,但我們不得不承認,現今香港的教育制度是非常失敗,朝令夕改,無所適從(會考竟然問『屈機』),我希望送我的小朋友到蔡繼有這些學校,完全沒有做白老鼠的 ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3300
29#
發表於 08-11-14 09:40 |只看該作者
其實現時的334學制,提倡以通識教學,不再死讀書的做法,有點類似IB理念。這個改革本質是好,但要將孩子的邏輯思維提升之餘,更需提升教師的質素,拼棄傳統教學方法,學校亦需調整校風以之配合,家庭更需具備求知精神。改革祇是口號,要成功落實,所花的資源其實是非常浩大的,成敗與否,唯有拭目以待。

真人真事一則,每到考試時間,媽媽級的同事們都會積極為孩子備試,最難最難捉模的一科就是通識科,除了考起學生們之外,家長們對這一科都顯得特別戰戰競競。終於試題出了,一條小四程度的問題:「為何石油氣的價格升幅會比汽油的多?」自問真的無本事答。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


286
30#
發表於 08-11-14 12:51 |只看該作者
kaifu, you don't really need to give up.  It's just different people have different views and perspectives.  As kyliema said, there's no 'right' or 'wrong' in some of the arguments.  
I gather the primary difference stems from the different planning for the kid's studies.  To be honest, if one only eyes on local universities, CKY stands no better chance than most local schools.  What CKY is embracing is a more flexible and, hopefully, more international, education. You have rightly pointed out that it does have financial implications on the part of parents.  Fingers crossed.

Rank: 4


801
31#
發表於 08-11-14 16:06 |只看該作者
終於出左4/12的2nd in名單...好在都有得in....

Rank: 1


15
32#
發表於 08-11-15 00:48 |只看該作者
My son got the 2nd interview too.  But my concern is on the school fee, $5xxx is very very expensive, I don't know will I let my son go to this school even he got accepted, I don't know can we afford this high school fee for 11 years !!  Anyone knows that any government subsidry on the school fee ?  Thanks !!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


263
33#
發表於 08-11-15 23:09 |只看該作者

回覆 # 的文章

Dear BusyMommy,

Don't cal. like that, if you feel $5,xxx is too much. You shouldn't select CKY cos the school fee will be much higher than this in upper forms. I have no offence but it is true fact although CKY's fee is cheaper than international school but still much higher than those DSS and subvented one.

Most parent select CKY but not DSS  has one objective is to let their kids not to follow local exam cos it goes too extreme on mark driven base. It doesn't mean exam is useless but it just reflect how far kids learn and nothing worth spending hours for memorise exact wording.

For DBSPD or SPCC or other DSS, since they are required to let most of their graduate to follow local exam(gov. policy in return for their subvention), they can't provide all class to follow IB stream. They alway claim it all depends on the suitability of student to follow IB or local exam, do you believe?

For parent concerning why CKY go for IGCSE and IB rather than just like the future form six local exam. I still support CKY's decision since I admit some student can not cope with the IB's standard for studying, there should be exit point for them. Some may say would it be the local exam? If that is the case, student will back to the marks driven machine and the endless suppl. workbook for precision and speedy result. Is it all we want?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3693
34#
發表於 08-11-16 17:24 |只看該作者

回覆 # 的文章

"...marks driven machine and ... for precision and speedy result."

this is the most precise description of the existing system i had ever seen.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3300
35#
發表於 08-11-17 09:44 |只看該作者
其實蔡繼有都有學費減免計劃,不過入息限制頗嚴,未必很多家庭可享受得到。

原帖由 BusyMommy 於 08-11-15 00:48 發表
My son got the 2nd interview too.  But my concern is on the school fee, $5xxx is very very expensive, I don't know will I let my son go to this school even he got accepted, I don't know can we afford  ...

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8048
36#
發表於 08-11-17 11:52 |只看該作者
I think many of the CKY parents are working as 公務員, am I right?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1911
37#
發表於 08-11-25 17:49 |只看該作者
原帖由 TaoTaoMa 於 08-11-13 18:24 發表
(IB)一個外國認可的考試,我覺得不論10年後,香港的大學會預留多少的學位給些學生,但我們不得不承認,現今香港的教育制度是非常失敗,朝令夕改,無所適從(會考竟然問『屈機』),我希望送我的小朋友到蔡繼有這些學校,完全沒有做白老鼠的 ...


I am not too sure about that.  There was a report in the Guardian about a month ago that the hk's system is considered among the top 5 in the world (together with Finland, Germany, Singapore and I forgot).  In fact, Japan is planning an extensive study of the hk's system.  Maybe we are not that bad after all.

[ 本帖最後由 tingtingting 於 08-11-25 17:50 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3300
38#
發表於 08-11-25 18:23 |只看該作者
若日本希望仿傚香港教育,我卻希望香港跟從芬蘭教育呢!在芬蘭的教育環境下,孩子喜歡閱讀,自學能力又高,這才是真正的學習精神呢!這也是我將孩子送入蔡繼有的原因呢!

原帖由 tingtingting 於 08-11-25 17:49 發表


I am not too sure about that.  There was a report in the Guardian about a month ago that the hk's system is considered among the top 5 in the world (together with Finland, Germany, Singapore and I f ...

[ 本帖最後由 kyliema2006 於 08-11-25 18:24 編輯 ]

Rank: 2


38
39#
發表於 08-11-25 18:25 |只看該作者
cky result is too late! wake till neck long!
‹ 上一主題|下一主題