hi, yes my kid is studying at HMT PN now and teachers are very good. Honestly, I can't guarantee all the teachers are good in one school, so have to see our luck, but in general are good I observed.
原帖由 littlea 於 10-6-4 16:09 發表
Dear granddelsol, I share the same opinion as yours.
Same as your case, I have given up KV also.
I also prefer my child to have a better environment for learning Eng and Man, in particularly in this ...
wotaitai, what you describe that should be the way of how the international school teaches English. Isn't it ?They encourage students write by phonics and do not correct the spelling. I heard my friend who has a child studying in IS also learns in this way. A K3 student (ie year I in IS) can write out a whole essay.
原帖由 wootaitai 於 10-6-4 16:44 發表
are you talking about victoria?
yes ar. But its more about encouraging free flowing ideas in the form of writing . EG the teacher will not correct the spelling etc but instead would praise the kids " ...
I think that SC is a traditional HK style KG. It probably emphasizes on how many words, how difficult the words and correct spelling and grammer. This is what main stream local primary school and their parents concern. Whereas, the teaching in Victoria emphasizes on free flowing of ideas and encouragement. It is more a IS style.
This is what I guess. ? correct
原帖由 granddelsol 於 10-6-4 17:14 發表
I can't judge SC but I am sure Vic is not "crap". Anyway, 我其實真係唔明d人的意見點解可以去到咁盡, 一間學校比人話到係"垃圾"對好多讀緊的人好唔公平....不過人地講咩我地無權過問, 不過做人說話真係要留有餘 ...
原帖由 granddelsol 於 10-6-4 17:14 發表
I can't judge SC but I am sure Vic is not "crap". Anyway, 我其實真係唔明d人的意見點解可以去到咁盡, 一間學校比人話到係"垃圾"對好多讀緊的人好唔公平....不過人地講咩我地無權過問, 不過做人說話真係要留有餘 ...