用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 幼校討論 內地港童適齡 爭入本地名校
發新帖
查看: 3464|回覆: 14
go

內地港童適齡 爭入本地名校 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


923
1#
發表於 11-7-1 10:07 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
【經濟日報專訊】父、母雙方均非港人而來港產子,衍生的「雙非童」來港求學問題湧現,當局07年開始向非本地孕婦收取4.8萬元分娩服務費,令來港產子內地人趨向中產人士,他們所生的「雙非童」陸續踏進適齡入學期,不少內地父母近月組織幼稚園或小學考察團來港,更設下高要求,希望入讀本港名校。
有學者認為,政府不能再把跨境或內地童赴港讀書問題視之不理,應盡快調查了解他們來港的意願,作出配套部署(見另文——「適齡入學童 未來10年料增4萬」)。
本港的「雙非童」數字於過去數年間大幅飈升(見表),他們陸續踏入適齡入學期,為鋪排子女前程,不少內地家長紛組團來港考察。
查問是否用英文 有否電腦
早前便有40人的內地家長團,要求參觀天水圍浸信會華恩幼稚園,但被校長譚雲珍婉拒:「3、4人可以安排,慢慢講解學校設施,太多應付不來。」她表示,早前曾接待20至30人的家長團,他們像旅行團般,逗留十多分鐘拍拍照便離開,非常匆忙。
非牟利幼兒教育機構議會主席曾甘秀雲形容,今年組團來港考察的家長,均是「家境不俗的一群」,有20至30人組成一團「幼稚園睇樓團」,先觀察學校環境、設施,繼而提高要求,查問「是否用英語上課,有否電腦設施?」
本身是港人的深港跨境學童家長會主席黃菁葒與丈夫倆,因工作關係長居深圳,兩名分別5歲及7歲兒子每日均跨境上學。黃菁葒經常被內地家長問及到港讀書情況:「哪一間學校好,哪一間設施怎樣,有無校巴都要考慮。」為解答家長疑難,她索性今年起安排學校考察團來港,每次約20人,參觀兩間學校,一間小學、一間幼稚園。
家長駕車來港 九龍塘接送
香港國際社會服務社跨境及國際個案工作服務總監張玉清指出,有內地家長為令子女可來港唸書,不惜每日親自由內地駕車,前往九龍塘名校接送。
家長黃太(化名)透露,曾致電九龍塘某名牌國際學校,查詢會否招收跨境童,校方以考慮學生家庭學習環境為前提,表示幼兒教育不會接收跨境童;但卻表示,校內有來自內地學童,但父母均已投資移民來港。
上水鳳溪創新小學校長李淑賢坦言,學券制推出後,校內跨境學童學習程度亦愈來愈高:「以往只有2、3成在港完成幼稚園才升小學,現在有8成均曾入讀本港幼稚園。」
有政府高官透露,其北京中產朋友來港產子後,欲安排子女來港讀書,但心儀的學校並非上水粉嶺等屋邨小學,而是九龍塘區傳統名校,其朋友知道機會微,甚至親身來港叩門,還在學校門口等校長,對校長說:「不用擔心(學生)返學的問題,我們會包車來香港,十多人(內地學童)組團一起來讀書!」
   0    0    0    0

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5870
2#
發表於 11-7-1 20:20 |只看該作者
有個內地朋友直接要求找個培正學位俾佢個仔,我自己想入都入唔到,,佢地真係愈來愈過份,HK資源俾內地好得多,而錢佢地開始俾我們搵得多,不只教育,醫療,佢地什麼野都來跟我們搶,點算?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1197
3#
發表於 11-7-1 22:30 |只看該作者
The competition is so serious these years even among Hong Kong people, and we have even more from the mainland china?! Oh my goodness!!!!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1216
4#
發表於 11-7-4 13:57 |只看該作者
其實我今年帶小朋友in某名幼稚園時,見到一對疑似國內人仕參加interview, 唔係富豪嗰隻,似剛剛坐火車落尼,仲拖住箱行李,in 完之後不停同老師90度鞠躬,鞠至行出課室為止。幾誇張。

我唸國內富豪未必哮,因為佢哋會讀d幾萬蚊 d international school. 可能係國內中產or below 啦。希望政府快d有政策管制啦,唔係我哋d小朋友真係好慘。

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5979
5#
發表於 11-7-6 02:17 |只看該作者

Rank: 3Rank: 3


463
6#
發表於 11-7-6 10:13 |只看該作者
從另一角度,可能有競爭是一件好事!我指學業成績呢!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1216
7#
發表於 11-7-6 11:43 |只看該作者

回復 1# busy_penny 的帖子

Well. 適量競爭係良性,但係而家似乎係過度。俾家長同小朋友好大pressure。外國小朋友向冇乜競爭環境之下學習,成績一樣好,知識水平比較高 in general, more ppl can have high level education as there are more opportunity. Knoweledge and competition has no correlation.

[ 本帖最後由 cccbaby 於 11-7-6 13:14 編輯 ]


11
8#
發表於 11-7-7 10:37 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1216
9#
發表於 11-7-7 14:03 |只看該作者

回復 1# wailing 的帖子

Totally agree.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6473
10#
發表於 11-7-7 22:16 |只看該作者
其實局長有無預計過,几年後大軍一齊爭小學,香港夠唔夠位?名校官津就依家行小班紛紛減位,過几年要加返位,可能都係加返D徘徊殺校邊緣既學校既位!

原帖由 wailing 於 11-7-7 10:37 發表
The number of Mainlanders are so huge, how can kindergardens in HK adapt to them? now hospital, kindergardens, primary n secondary schools, and university in future. How come HK government is not doin ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


361
11#
發表於 11-7-8 03:30 |只看該作者
totally agree.

I do thnk the HK Govt should do sth. See, we need those famous school but they force those school to cut the places, instead of looking at what public's needs. Then they will change their idea as many children can come from Mainland China.

They never have deep thinking before making decision. Long ago, even we learnt English since P1, our English may not be up to standard or can speak fluent English, yet, they adopted mother language; now they changes their views, for what ever they want.

Letting those pregnant women to come to HK without control, can't stop them for illegal staying, or rush to emergency, and esp. makes nurses and doctor life busy if babies are not heavy...and I can't get a booking for seminar in QE when I gave born to babies 2 yr ago, all fully booked, my 1st inspection can be done when I was 5 mth pregnacy, waits for 3 or 4 hrs a day for 5 min checking, and can book 3 checking only, and no ultra sound until I told the doctor my c+ doctor said my baby position is too low and easily cause bleeding when it is 37 weeks. they have so much money, why don't they go to c+ hospital but occupied out space...yet, I went C+ finally as I don't believe in QE, with no detail checking on my status, how can i feel safe....so fight for those from China for place at Union again.

Now they are going to fight for school with us. We don't have enough space and we have to fight with kids in HK, so will they get 9 yrs free education later?

Or do those laws like those good terms and protect the maids right that they can always sure the employer, and if they lie and sick before she comes, we have to pay for round trip tickets, yet agent fee, and if she is pregnant, no need to work but stay at your home and you have to take care of her; and if she is sick, I have to pay for all medical expenses....any boss in any company will provide such a good employment contract for HK people?

Why don't those go out for fight for their rights help mammys on these kinds of issues?

So maybe one day, the Govt will set up rules like those protecting the maid for those pregnant women, children from Mainland China but study in HK, and enjoy more benefits than us....so why we have to pay high tax, no help for middle class, elderly, illness?

Sorry maybe I am to "excited", I am not discriminating them, but really, can't stand more and more unfair cases to us.

Rank: 4


999
12#
發表於 11-7-8 15:35 |只看該作者
香港政府一蟹不如一蟹, 咁多年黎土生土長既香港人已經學會自求多福, 求人不如求己, 與其等佢決策打救, 不如等運到. 所以生仔睇C+, 幼稚園冇學卷, 目標私校/直資.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


195
13#
發表於 11-7-8 16:02 |只看該作者
Absolutely agree with Momo

Rank: 1


3
14#
發表於 11-7-9 14:52 |只看該作者
Wow! Very terrible! How can my son get a place?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


372
15#
發表於 11-7-10 23:36 |只看該作者
香港政府從來都吾理我地死活架la
‹ 上一主題|下一主題