用戶登入
用戶名稱：
密      碼：
登記帳號忘記密碼

討論區

教育王國
教育講場
使用意見
幼兒教育
幼校討論
幼教雜談
小學教育
小一選校
小學雜談
中學教育
升中派位
中學交流
初中教育
專上教育
備戰大學
選科選校
國際教育
國際學校
海外留學
知識增值
課外活動
教材閱讀
公開考試
深造進修
特殊教育
特殊教育
資優教育
自閉寶寶
智能評估
徵求專區
二手市場
誠徵老師
組班專區
徵保母車

   聯絡管理員
搜索
教育王國 › 討論區 › 小一選校 › 四大天王<二>: 女拔萃DGJS必入攻略 (快自行COPY) ...
查看: 12523|回覆: 34
 go

四大天王<二>: 女拔萃DGJS必入攻略 (快自行COPY) [複製鏈接]

PhdJessiema


323
1#
發表於 10-9-6 01:40 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
   2    0    0    1

返回頂部

k.kung

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
2#
發表於 10-9-6 10:44 |只看該作者
I don't think this is the DGJS必入攻略。  No one can gurantee a seat in dgjs even a girl has 15 points according to your post.

You said "don't push your girl if she is far behind the benchmark." Can you further explain what benchmark are you referring to?

Some information in your post has not been updated.

DGJS has limited 4 pages of additional documents since last year but not this year.

The interivew format has been changed since last year. However, we don't know the school will keep on using the new format or not. Do you have the insider news about it?

Original form:
Not necessary. Some successful girls submitted the form downloaded from school website.  There is no reason that the school put the form in the website but discriminates those applicants who submitted the self-downloaded form.

Birth Cert:
This is only used to prove the date of birth. You think too much.

Date of birth:
A younger girl may preform as well as a elder girl.

Photo:
A photo from the studio does not relate to the performance of a girl. However, the girl in the photo must look confident and smart.

Family Structure:
The information may be used during the interview. Sometimes, the interviewer may ask questions about the applicant's family.

School Result:
Of course, a girl gets better chance to apply any private school (except those school for boys) if she is the first in the class.

Other points:
I think the school is focus on how the parents support and develop their daughter rather than the occupation, address, and old girl....etc.






原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 01:40 發表
女拔萃DGJS之技巧

We have asked for so many people, and in their heart, HK no. 1 school should be DGJS. This year there are 4 girls got 10As from HKCEE. Thus, every year parent ...

[ 本帖最後由 k.kung 於 10-9-6 10:46 編輯 ]

返回頂部

luiluimama

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2173
3#
發表於 10-9-6 10:50 |只看該作者
你上年講完今年又再講, 真係辛苦哂你呀


原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 01:40 發表
女拔萃DGJS之技巧

We have asked for so many people, and in their heart, HK no. 1 school should be DGJS. This year there are 4 girls got 10As from HKCEE. Thus, every year parent ...

返回頂部

k.kung

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
4#
發表於 10-9-6 11:14 |只看該作者
講完又講唔緊要, 問題係無update資料。一開始就錯, 今年女拔係有3個10A唔係4個。

http://news.hotpot.hk/fruit/art_main.php?iss_id=20100805&sec_id=4104&art_id=14313016


原帖由 luiluimama 於 10-9-6 10:50 發表
你上年講完今年又再講, 真係辛苦哂你呀


返回頂部

OCEP

Rank: 2


48
5#
發表於 10-9-6 11:24 |只看該作者
You wrote similar things this time last year so I am not sure what your motives are, I just hope BK parents are not going to fall for this and ended up asking you to send personal messages to them, this would allow you to sell your services (please tell me you don't run a Primary 1 interview class). As some BK parents already pointed out in their earlier reply, your information is outdated and complete speculation, but I am sure there will be some BK parents responding to your post with lots of questions and queries so at the end of the day, you will succeed in selling your services and if this is your objective, I urge all BK parents not to fall prey to your cheap actions.

返回頂部

luiluimama

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2173
6#
發表於 10-9-6 11:35 |只看該作者
咁無水準咖, 執都唔執下d料呀??

原帖由 k.kung 於 10-9-6 11:14 發表
講完又講唔緊要, 問題係無update資料。一開始就錯, 今年女拔係有3個10A唔係4個。

http://news.hotpot.hk/fruit/art_main.php?iss_id=20100805&sec_id=4104&art_id=14313016


返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
7#
發表於 10-9-6 15:21 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Sumyeema1

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
8#
發表於 10-9-6 15:41 |只看該作者
PhdJessiema,

雖然我女不是今年考小學，我自去年起已留意升小學的話題， 你的 post 對我這個沒有內幕消息的家長有參考價值， 我已 save 了你的文章。

希望其他家長也可以分享你們的經驗。

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 15:21 發表
100% of NOT selling any service.:)

People here are same as last year.

Would give an update soon.

No more unreasonable accusation, please.

返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
9#
發表於 10-9-6 20:41 |只看該作者

回覆 2# k.kung 的文章

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
10#
發表於 10-9-6 20:44 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
11#
發表於 10-9-6 20:46 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
12#
發表於 10-9-6 20:55 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

nicolemummy

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7516
13#
發表於 10-9-6 21:53 |只看該作者
Hi PhdJessiema,

Yes, people here are same as last year. ha ha. Last year, I read with thanks with your message. Am I having girl applying DGS? No, not last year. Not this year. But this year, I have a boy.

Although my target is neither DGS/DBS/SPCC etc, your message is really meaningful.

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 15:21 發表
100% of NOT selling any service.:)

People here are same as last year.

Would give an update soon.

No more unreasonable accusation, please.

返回頂部

PhdJessiema


323
14#
發表於 10-9-7 01:07 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

k.kung

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
15#
發表於 10-9-7 01:29 |只看該作者
From the school website, there is a paragraph stating that

"The application form downloaded from the School website is the same as the one distributed at School and applicants are encouraged to download the form for their convenience."

Are you suggesting that the school lied to the public just for your so-called strategy?


原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 20:41 發表
This is part of the strategy. Form filling is a kind of serious knowledge. This is the first image of how to present your kid. All those points are concluded from various kind of parents for few years ...

[ 本帖最後由 k.kung 於 10-9-7 02:40 編輯 ]

返回頂部

k.kung

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
16#
發表於 10-9-7 02:05 |只看該作者
Do you know the 3 girls very well?  What makes you believe the results are driven by money instead of their preformance? Can you provide more information to support your point of view?


原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 20:44 發表
Do U believe the recruitment is just based on girls' performance or character or ba ba ba...........


You must be dreaming.

Just simply tell me: why only Eason's daughter win, but left out B's and K ...

[ 本帖最後由 k.kung 於 10-9-7 02:46 編輯 ]

返回頂部

Arosa

Rank: 4


759
17#
發表於 10-9-7 08:57 |只看該作者

回覆 3# PhdJessiema 的文章

i just pass by, but would like to thank you for the info shared, including that of the other school.

返回頂部

munce

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4025
18#
發表於 10-9-7 10:09 |只看該作者
PhdJessiema,

Thanks for your info.

I have got some questions.

(1) Why SC has such a high success rate?

(2) My husband is a full time dad taking care of the kids. And I am a medical professional. Is there any chance? Does Mrs Dai prefer this structure?

(3) I thought Yam Tat Wah's daughter also got admitted to DGJS? Ah B's one got admitted to SPCCPS?

(4) Is Mrs Dai going to interview for the 1st round? How many pupils together?

thx

返回頂部

munce

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4025
19#
發表於 10-9-7 10:12 |只看該作者
Also, what is PS and LK stands for?

And are you sure CCKG only got 11 which is lower than SC?


Thx

返回頂部

Sumyeema1

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
20#
發表於 10-9-7 10:45 |只看該作者
School NameK3 studentGirls (estimation)DGJS P1%
CCKG: 1184421126.19%
Vict CB: 682 + 16 =9849612.24%
SC: 31513 + 202 = 715357318.68%
SKH: 6119 + 59 = 1788966.74%
SPC: 818017084.71%
Vict HMT: 284 + 16 = 1005024.00%
Heep Y: 2606023.33%
S Heart: 218017021.18%
KV: 257728831.04%
York: 148 + 268 = 31615810.63%
PS: 33
LK: 1 1
原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 10-9-6 20:55 發表
OK, new information. Last year success case:

SC: 31
CCKG: 11
SPC: 8
Vict CB: 6
Vict HMT: 2
SKH: 6
PS: 3
KV: 2
S Heart: 2
Heep Y: 2
York: 1
LK: 1
Others: 33

[ 本帖最後由 Sumyeema1 於 10-9-7 10:48 編輯 ]

返回頂部

‹ 上一主題|下一主題 ›
12下一頁
返回列表
發新帖