HKUST Information Day 2013 (28/9) 09:00 - 18:00

mamagrace

http://infoday.ust.hk/

October.

genpub 發表於 13-9-29 19:03
http://localcms.als.hku.hk/admission/local/file/upload/360/Selection_Principles_0520.pdf
2014年的未出, 看2013年的, 約一半是用BEST 5, 有一些有指明科目。

無錯, 只要你理科夠出色, 而中文只得3的話, 港大都收你.
我囡學校師兄,  舊年DSE理科成績好勁,但中文只得2, 無大學讀.
今年補考中文, 結果考到3, 港大收左.

事實係, 除非入理學院唔計中文成績, 如果唔係, 改變都不大.

genpub

http://localcms.als.hku.hk/admis ... Principles_0520.pdf

2014年的未出, 看2013年的, 約一半是用BEST 5, 有一些有指明科目。

ANChan59

genpub 發表於 13-9-29 18:18
回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Not all faculties, read the admission requirement. Even if you are good in mat ...

You are right about weighing.
My original thought is all HKUST faculties are not follow 4C + 2X, and you are right Science and Social Science don't have weighing on English and Maths.

For HKU, only Science for best of 5, how about other faculties?

genpub

回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Not all faculties, read the admission requirement. Even if you are good in maths, you do not have a better advantage if you want to got Science and Social Science.

For Science, it is just a must to be included in the formula, but no increase in weighting.
For Social Science, you can choose not to have maths included in the formula.

http://join.ust.hk/local/jupas/apply_jupas_entry_subject.html

ANChan59

genpub 發表於 13-9-29 17:53
http://localcms.als.hku.hk/admission/local/file/upload/360/Selection_Principles_0520.pdf

看看2013年 ...

HKUST for all faculties and with weighing on English and Maths..

genpub

http://localcms.als.hku.hk/admis ... Principles_0520.pdf

看看2013年港大的收生要求，從來港大理學院都是用Best 5來收生(其實由第一屆DSE就這樣), 可以不計中文和通識(當然成績好的話亦可放入FORMULA內計算), 是科大反應太慢，現在才跟風吧！

ANChan59

小彬彬 發表於 13-9-29 17:34
未知中大港大是否照跟, 都好混乱

我相信會跟，唔跟，d 理科人會可能流走往科大！
而且其餘兩大未公佈新的收生準則，重可以改。

我覺得清楚左，以前的計法跟本 doesn't make sense。

小彬彬

ANChan59 發表於 13-9-29 00:32
根本一開始就聚焦錯誤，現在撥亂反正！

未知中大港大是否照跟, 都好混乱

ANChan59

In the previous admission criteria, Chinese and LS are counted and therefore some students can get in a program based on good grade in the two cores, but weak in electives, so they can't  survive  in the program. But some students may have flying colour results in Electives, but only pass in the two cores, they are out of certain programs. Professors knows the latter group more suitable for the programs.

If not counting the two core subjects, so students will have better grades and background on electives have better chance to get in the appropriate programs, reduce the chance of mismatching.

以前教授怕學生高分低能，現在更怕低分低能，只識吹水的學生。（低分是指選修科低分。）

ANChan59

webeheld 發表於 13-9-29 02:15
IB: 35-40 typical offer for SENG SBM and SSCI, except GCS 32-35 and GBUS 40-42.(all out of 45)

For BBA, the grade is going up from 34 to 35. For GBus, the same.

dolala

唔計分？嘛一樣要3322，除非其他選修科（如M1M2）好叻，否則都係幫助不大。

webeheld

IB: 35-40 typical offer for SENG SBM and SSCI, except GCS 32-35 and GBUS 40-42.(all out of 45)

ANChan59

小彬彬 發表於 13-9-29 00:27
中文和通識重要性減低了, 應該是合理的, 但當大部份學生發力谷中文和通識的時候, 忽然又改, 玩死........
...

根本一開始就聚焦錯誤，現在撥亂反正！

小彬彬

中文和通識重要性減低了, 應該是合理的, 但當大部份學生發力谷中文和通識的時候, 忽然又改, 玩死........

ANChan59

kiwaiwong 發表於 13-9-28 19:40
每個subject都係比重（1），怎樣影響今年吸收生？

I clicked the original post and my remark refer to the change of admission calculation, not focus on 4C + 2X any more is a good move to recruit better students in general. I am not refer to Science faculty.

ANChan59

原帖由 kiwaiwong 於 13-09-28 發表
每個subject都係比重（1），怎樣影響今年吸收生？

You raised a good question, I need to reconsider different scenario.

In my mind, I considered the difference between 13/14 vs 14/15 and not 12/13 vs 14/15.

I am outside and double check the difference tomorrow.

kiwaiwong

原帖由 ANChan59 於 13-09-28 發表
回復 mamagrace 的帖子

Good move to recruit better students.

每個subject都係比重（1），怎樣影響今年吸收生？

ANChan59

回復 mamagrace 的帖子

Good move to recruit better students.

9498mami

理學院改咗收生要求，係容易咗？定難咗呢？