嬴在起跑點的人是否真的嬴到尾呢!!!

serinac

家長。

ANChan59

回復 serinac 的帖子

多謝澄清。
這是家長問題，跟學校関係不大！

okangelmama

13-3-26 05:11 上傳

下載附件 (20.14 KB)

donutbaby

ysnmama

我認為根基打得穩固，有勇氣和不怕輸，才可以有一直跑下去。更不怕終點設在那裡。萬丈高樓從地起啊。

哈呣

原帖由 okangelmama 於 13-03-26 發表

真的很贊成

steven819

The said true to the post is that the answer is not the way we want to be. The senario of the 'long old cantonese film' that the rich man's son is a bad guy where the poor guy's son can endure hardship and become a great success is a dream to encourage people only. In my encounter with colleagues and classmates, most of these people come from super rich family are very nice people who never want to show off. Those who are not so are offen over exaggerated. There is nothing wrong about it. The problem is, in our days, child like the former Secretary of Justice Mr Wong Yan Lung can have a chance of  studying with the better off people and up grading his social class. The problem is nowaday children (or actually all the youug people) in Hong Kong has much less chance of upward mobility of the social status. That is the problem of the system and the responsibility of our government. There is no point to discuss whether children with a better resources has a better outcome. The answer must be ' in general it is true but in particular case not necessary'. If we always add 'too much this' and 'too much that ' for whatever thing, the answer mush be wrong.
What I'm saying is we can't change the system and we should adapt to it. I don't know the intention of Mr or Ms Lam's article. Too much of anything our children is not good of course but we are playing a game who cannot win without strategy. I think this forum is to let us sharing our experiences and making us comrades to combat together. Accusing other parents training their child by add the 'too much' may let some parents think that they don't need to prepare their children for the game.

shadeslayer

原帖由 awah112 於 13-03-25 發表
贏在起跑線輸在終點
林沛理

的確，西方人的孩子遠比中國同年紀的孩子活潑、好動，富冒險精神和創造力。

Xxxxxx

這是對嗎？值得深思。 All work no play makes a dull jack.  Is there truth in it？

gigayan

gillgillkwok 發表於 13-3-26 10:09
眼見朋友嘅兒子一歲開始，已經番四五日學，而那個小朋友又的確聰明伶俐！覺得係咪需要俾自己嘅孩子，有更多 ...

按小朋友的能力, 俾足夠的知識佢, 作為家長, 你應該會知道你的小朋友幾時"太飽", 小朋友食滯左對家庭、小朋友本身都唔係咁有益.....

至於 "嬴在起跑點的人是否真的嬴到尾呢", 唔知大家有無睇過賽馬? 有d馬就可以由頭帶到尾, 有d馬會後勁不繼. 有d馬會係中路殺返上來, 有d馬甚至墮馬..... 跑贏的通常一開始唔會落後太多, 追都辛苦喇, 我覺得keep住唔好太辛苦, 唔好太趕, 又唔好太落後, 放鬆d來跑, 對大家都有好處。

Hoho8

好的基础就是成功的基础。我有朋友曾经和我说他从幼儿园时家里逼他做很多事，使他进到好的中学，直到大学都很优秀（毕业拿到优等）。他说小时候确实不是很开心，长大后，他还是要感谢他妈妈（听说他妈妈以前是名校老师）。我还是希望我的孩子是先苦后甜。

ANChan59

回復 gigayan 的帖子

跑贏的通常一開始唔會落後太多, 追都辛苦喇, 我覺得keep住唔好太辛苦, 唔好太趕, 又唔好太落後, 放鬆d來跑, 對大家都有好處

***************


好有共鳴！

jeff76916

回復 steven819 的帖子

其實教育理念有很多種, 很多互相之間是排他的. 除非當某人提出自己支持的理念時真的另有企圖, 否則或許不應下下用誅心輪討論大家都不能證明的所謂 "用心". 事實上, 很多人真的相信在孩提時間硬加"催谷"(我知何謂"催谷"也會有很大爭議, 但姑且讓他擱置一旁以免擾亂更重要的討論), 雖然在青年時會有成果, 但最終上大學或更近一步時就高下立見, 這就是為何歐洲很多國家不准孩提催谷, 又是為何香港有父母寧願花錢去國際學校也不去本地. 其實, 我的朋友(在內地開幼稚園)告訴我, 很多香港的催谷教育(如提早寫字), 內地直情是明文禁止, 因內地(起碼廣東南部)現行行緊輕鬆教學(忘了他的確實字眼). 我重申, 我不是支持叫小孩天天回家玩, 但我認為不須認定遊戲教育是垃圾 . 其實問題是很多人對"遊戲"想當然, 一廂情願理解"遊戲"就是無無謂謂的無聊玩意. 其實, 意大利的瑞吉歐及montessori也是用遊戲, 問題在於所謂"遊戲"是進行有意義的遊戲. 又例如國際學校最喜歡教小朋友煮東西, 其實是透過遊戲教搓, 壓, 切, 拉多種詞彙, 教自我控制, 教專注, 教對東西判斷.  又反過來說, 就算虎媽的教育如何所非議, 但他強調的discipline training, 亦有借鏡的地方 . 正如開卷有益, 兼聽一樣有益, 不用太早限死自己的想法.

gigayan

ha8mo 發表於 13-3-26 11:13
跑馬仔分草地同泥地，草地又會有快地、好地、黏地、軟地、大爛地，
你隻馬仔能否贏出，還需要天份看看你是 ...

哈哈!! 一講跑馬, 引晒d爸爸出來

講賽馬, 都有咁多野計算, 何況係人呢??

有人要贏間廠先覺得贏, 亦有人贏粒糖都開心既........

教馬都唔可以一本通書, 何況係一個人呢; 定下目標, 按小朋友既能力遞增或減少, 慢慢各位家長都可以搵到一條對的路!

Pigbaby

回復 ha8mo 的帖子

精景!!

jeff76916

智能發展或許有60%是天生的, 但智能發展(或全人發展)完全等於體能表現或賽馬走勢??

breadbb

所以我都唔贊成谷 但我會培養佢學習嘅興趣 但人地睇以為我好谷 =.=