邊間私小升小二跳船能力最強？

longlokma

原帖由 bubuG 於 14-08-08 發表
根據我的理解，SFA 暨 LS 家長嬲。

哦………………多謝你解釋

handh

其實真係冇需要爭抝, 不論 LS, SFA, GH, MCS, SMCC .... 等, 都係好多人心目中嘅好學校, 當然各有特色, 亦各有優點同缺點, 好視乎小朋友嘅特質, 適合邊間.

不過, 其實對有D資優學習能力超強嘅小朋友黎講, 教深D定教淺D, 可能分別不大, 因為佢地根本有自己嘅學習步伐同方式, 即使學校教深一年半載, 都未必符合佢地嘅步伐, 佢地會有自己嘅方法學習 (e.g. 課餘自己狂睇書) ... 返學比到佢地嘅係學習同其他人相處, 遵守規則紀律.    而正因為學校課程佢地能輕易應付, 就可以騰出好多時間發展其他方面, e.g. 体藝, 創意, 深入探索 .... 呢類小朋友, 讀邊間學校都分別唔大, 係唔係龍校亦唔再關鍵 ...... 當然, 若果父母想要安全感, 或者有細佬妹跟尾, 多數會揀有中學果D, 只因父母唔想煩 ...

唔好意思, 有似有D離題 ...

longlokma

原帖由 handh 於 14-08-08 發表
其實真係冇需要爭抝, 不論 LS, SFA, GH, MCS, SMCC .... 等, 都係好多人心目中嘅好學校, 當然各有特色, 亦 ...

同意

tsehon

原帖由 handh 於 14-08-08 發表
回覆 KikiDaddy 的帖子

同意。  有人走唔表示間學校唔好，只係人人情況唔同。

agreed

KikiDaddy

回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子

每個家長既價值觀不同, 真係汝之佳餚,彼之毒藥。 - This is the key point.

Prestigious primary schools are just too remote and almost untouchable to most of the parents who don't have any affiliation with the school or are not living in the same school net.


Quality private schools like APS, KTS, SFA and etc can provide a stepping-stone for the kids to transfer to these prestigious primary schools or allocate a place at a good EMI secondary schools after they finish P6. Curriculum of these schools must be more advance than other ordinary schools. This is because they need to elevate the academic performance of their students so that they can have better ranking in the secondary school allocation.


It wouldn't be a problem for most of the students of these private schools as their education level was already tested in the school admission interviews. In fact, it is very common that some kindergartens are teaching P1 materials in K3 and their students can continue the study seamlessly in these private primary schools.


Of course, parents must understand what they expect from these private schools before they let their children study there. The whole family need to devote their time and effort for six years to get a place at a good EMI secondary school. If the parents are looking for happy learning and more time for extra-curriculum activities, they better go somewhere else.


SFA is definitely not a perfect school and its weaknesses like big class size and limited campus facilities are obvious. Having said that, it is still a very good schools with an enriched curriculum and responsible teachers.  

Regarding the use of IPAD, I guess it is mainly use as an e-book to reduce the weight of school bag. Just wonder why the school choose IPAD instead of the more affordable android tabs.

Yanamami

KikiDaddy 發表於 14-8-9 00:15
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子

每個家長既價值觀不同, 真係汝之佳餚,彼之毒藥。 - This is the key point.

[size=15.199999809265137px]Of course, parents must understand what they expect from these private schools before they let their children study there. The whole family need to devote their time and effort for six years to get a place at a good EMI secondary school. If the parents are looking for happy learning and more time for extra-curriculum activities, they better go somewhere else.

[size=15.199999809265137px]*************************************
[size=15.199999809265137px]好同意。但其實讀無中學backup的私校，除左讀書，喺仲要擺好多是間喺ECA度，因為單喺成績，喺唔足夠去考“好”既EMI中學。好多私小學生喺擺唔少時間落體藝比賽上。

longlokma

原帖由 handh 於 14-08-08 發表
其實真係冇需要爭抝, 不論 LS, SFA, GH, MCS, SMCC .... 等, 都係好多人心目中嘅好學校, 當然各有特色, 亦 ...

我有一個疑問，要了解一個幼稚園孩子的天資才能，  是否/應否憑考核超前學術知識呢？
要k2-3生懂小一、二的知識其實没什麼难道，只要正常智力，有人教都可以做到。

所以要找出有天資的，根本该從理解力，观察力等方面入手，例如向孩子说故事后問孩子相关及延伸問題，而並非测试孩子懂不懂小學的中英数。

眼前这個幼稚園生追趕小學课程的情況越来越嚴重，是你們想要的？学生水平有因此提升嗎？再下一代的情况又会如何？

fishchow

個人認為， 超前教育 的入學考核主要方便配合小一開始時巳函接更深的課程。而且能否吸收超前課程，都要看小孩資質、思想發展程度、記憶力等，不是想谷就谷到。

longlokma

這情況当然跟教育制度有关。明白要有籌碼入好中学大学， 小学階段当然不能輕視。

記得过去幼稚园階段孩子回去只是玩，回家也是玩。現在大部份幼稚園也要讀書寫字测验考試，过的根本已經是小学生活。明白时代不到，現今孩子都是要追趕学習的，但不可以遲一点点，小一才开始嗎？

sissysze

原帖由 longlokma 於 14-08-09 發表
我有一個疑問，要了解一個幼稚園孩子的天資才能，  是否/應否憑考核超前學術知識呢？
要k2-3生懂小一、二的 ...

sfa 1st in 係有叫小朋友講故事架

sissysze

原帖由 longlokma 於 14-08-09 發表
這情況当然跟教育制度有关。明白要有籌碼入好中学大学， 小学階段当然不能輕視。

記得过去幼稚园階段孩子 ...

呢啲咪家長個人選擇，而家依然有happy 幼稚園，你唔想小朋友甘辛苦咪去happy 幼稚園，不過上到小學，一樣辛苦，除非屋企比到繼續去happy 小學，否則份阿媽，小朋友到小一一齊辛苦。

longlokma

原帖由 sissysze 於 14-08-09 發表
sfa 1st in 係有叫小朋友講故事架

但明顯这不是考核重点。多年前我朋友孩子去第一次已是筆試，做7張纸。

longlokma

原帖由 sissysze 於 14-08-09 發表
呢啲咪家長個人選擇，而家依然有happy 幼稚園，你唔想小朋友甘辛苦咪去happy 幼稚園，不過上到小學，一樣辛 ...

真正有能力的孩子，由小一开始努力也不算遲吧？而且，我們当年不也是這么讀書嗎？还不是年年有人做状元？

bubuG

原帖由 longlokma 於 14-08-09 發表
但明顯这不是考核重点。多年前我朋友孩子去第一次已是筆試，做7張纸。



  ...

Cky first interview in 2013 : 6 pages' written assessments

momama

原帖由 小曳人 於 14-08-08 發表
本帖最後由 小曳人 於 14-8-8 16:40 編輯

其實每個家庭，每個小朋友嘅情況都唔一樣

喺SFA跟得上，唔會擔心升中，大女離開入官津係為咗帶細妹，家庭開支亦減少好多，但由頭到尾認為SFA在品德及學科都教得好，亦唔係傳說中嘅深同谷。

sissysze

原帖由 longlokma 於 14-08-09 發表
真正有能力的孩子，由小一开始努力也不算遲吧？而且，我們当年不也是這么讀書嗎？还不是年年有人做状元？



  ...

真正有能力嘅孩子，中一先發力都未遲tim

longlokma

原帖由 sissysze 於 14-08-09 發表
真正有能力嘅孩子，中一先發力都未遲tim

说得对啊！冇咁叻就要小學开始發力！

那麼，幼稚園便要谷要發力代表什麼呢？对自己孩子没信心？      但偏偏又有家長挺自豪自己孩子幼稚園学懂小学知識。  

这不是十分矛盾嗎？

Argyle

原帖由 longlokma 於 14-08-09 發表
我有一個疑問，要了解一個幼稚園孩子的天資才能，  是否/應否憑考核超前學術知識呢？
要k2-3生懂小一、二的 ...

理論上我完全同意，不過何為小一、二程度呢？對一些有良好閱謮習慣的孩子，可能那些考題叫淺。學校選取準則，也未必只是答啱最多為次序。當然，如果有些考生孩子根本達不到基本要求，其實亦間接反影父母有否培養閱讀。有些一線名校過往或現在標榜全人發展，其實就要學生攞獎揚威，往往忽略讀書基本。

KikiDaddy

Yanamami 發表於 14-8-9 07:58
Of course, parents must understand what they expect from these private schools before they let their ...

Agree and that's why the pressure of secondary school place allocation on parents and their child is so high.