教統局-“嚴查”和 "嚴懲”虛報地址, 特別是 41校網

talk3talk4

原文章由 chanhao 於 08-3-3 10:42 發表
Officially, 你唔係住o係o個度, 梗係唔得. 問題係點證明你唔係住o係o個度, 教育局亦束手無策.

點證明你唔係住o係o個度? <-- don't worry how can they prove, because they will visit you suddenly.......

chanhao

I'm sure they wouldn't.

原文章由 talk3talk4 於 08-3-12 15:16 發表

點證明你唔係住o係o個度? <-- don't worry how can they prove, because they will visit you suddenly.......

mamagohome

原文章由 鳳梨 於 08-1-8 14:53 發表
ｓｏ咪唔好虛報地址囉～
不過做得出都要ｔａｋｅ　ｒｉｓｋ

let us play the game in accordance with the prevailing rule!

we should consider to write to mr cheung man kwok, legislator councillor representing the edcuation constituency, demanding mr. cheung to follow up the issue with the relevant education department, ie. enforcing the education department to take immediate actions and possible enactment of new rule.

a few clearks with one officer at the education department could check all those relevant applicants applying for net 41 school net within a few days, not few weeks!

should we demand the highest grade relevant officer in charging of this address vetting to answer questions raised by mr cheung??????

talk3talk4

原文章由 chanhao 於 08-3-13 17:46 發表
I'm sure they wouldn't.

I don't know why are you sure they wouldn't visit the suspect address.
But I can tell you they have visited me at night suddenly in without any appointment.

bbpoon

但突擊家訪又不代表什麼,或者我平時晚上十一或十二點才回家.而小朋友放在家人度,要星期六日才返屋企.

而星期六日家訪時又可能我去了街,但我真的沒有虛報地址.  因為他們又沒有預約,真的check到我不時常在家有什麼後果?難道會取消派位資格?Please comment.

謝謝!

dad1234

原文章由 bbpoon 於 08-3-18 23:05 發表
但突擊家訪又不代表什麼,或者我平時晚上十一或十二點才回家.而小朋友放在家人度,要星期六日才返屋企.

而星期六日家訪時又可能我去了街,但我真的沒有虛報地址.  因為他們又沒有預約,真的check到我不時常在家有什麼後 ...

就好似上法庭一樣,睇個官信邊個.

Dalwm

What is the date and time they visit?  What is the question they ask you?

Thanks.

原文章由 talk3talk4 於 08-3-18 18:15 發表


I don't know why are you sure they wouldn't visit the suspect address.
But I can tell you they have visited me at night suddenly in without any appointment.

chanhao

傻o左咩, 上法庭. 告你咩? 社署就有.  很簡單, 無法可依.

原文章由 dad1234 於 08-3-18 23:37 發表


就好似上法庭一樣,睇個官信邊個.

chanhao

仲有, 社署家訪都會預先通知.

funnybb

真金不怕熊爐火! 如果真係o係41網住, 怕咩家訪呀! 但如果係虛報, 報之前應該預o左要冒風險, 就算結果係被教署取消學位, 都係咎由自取!

mtkdc

你有你捉，仍有不少人願意為自己子女冒險。法律之外，本人覺得其情可憫，可憐天下父母心。如果執行法律是要運用公帑，作為納稅人，我衷心希望政府去打擊騙取綜緩的人，而不是打擊那些努力賺錢的小販。

鳳梨

都唔可以敢講, 事實係對真正住係該區既小朋友唔公平, 你想讀邊區最fair就係搬去邊區, 小朋友第日都知家長講大話, 用不合法既手段去取得呢個位. 而且要check又好易, 只要random抽20,30個家長深入查核, 殺一警百, 自然唔會d人咁張揚..

至於騙取攞綜綬, 到處國家都有, 亦都做唔到嘜, 只要家庭合資格你又奈佢哋唔來, 因為香港無最低工資, d家庭出去只搵得5,6千,又要搭車, 不如攞welfare留係屋企好過, 不過唔係係人都會拋得低尊嚴.

外國d tax 仲重, 起碼30% of　ｉｎｃｏｍｅ　ｔａｘ，　taxpayer 一樣無聲出，　而香港就話有大陸人黎生仔，　係外國一樣有香港媽咪專程過去生ｂｂ攞居留，　幫小朋友攞福利　ｏｒ　大左過去讀書，　即係香港既問題唔係香港獨有.

原文章由 mtkdc 於 08-3-31 01:44 發表
你有你捉，仍有不少人願意為自己子女冒險。法律之外，本人覺得其情可憫，可憐天下父母心。如果執行法律是要運用公帑，作為納稅人，我衷心希望政府去打擊騙取綜緩的人，而不是打擊那些努力賺錢的小販。 ...

jena2468

老實講我都有諗過借地址 , 但係諗深一層, 對於有信仰嘅我, 同培育緊仔女信仰嘅我都係唔應該做 ! 何況以身作則確實重要, 自己叫仔女唔好講大話, 但自己走去做, 點可以做仔女嘅榜樣呢 !? 所以值唔值得冒險出術真係要睇下個人價值觀

mimia810

I'm living at 34 net but first round 派位心儀Marynoll (totally got 20 marks).  Will the chance be less if I live at 34 net ne?  And for lucky draw, is it still have chance to draw Marynoll or should I pick 協恩as 1st choice?
mimia

原文章由 jena2468 於 08-4-2 03:22 PM 發表
老實講我都有諗過借地址 , 但係諗深一層, 對於有信仰嘅我, 同培育緊仔女信仰嘅我都係唔應該做 ! 何況以身作則確實重要, 自己叫仔女唔好講大話, 但自己走去做, 點可以做仔女嘅榜樣呢 !? 所以值唔值得冒險出術 ...

鳳梨

For the 1st round, they dont count your address, but 2nd round, you have to choose your living area's schools.

原文章由 mimia810 於 08-4-2 19:08 發表
I'm living at 34 net but first round 派位心儀Marynoll (totally got 20 marks).  Will the chance be less if I live at 34 net ne?  And for lucky draw, is it still have chance to draw Marynoll or should I ...