- 在線時間
- 136 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-11-3
- 國民生產力
- 5
- 附加生產力
- 1080
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 08-10-9
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 267
- 主題
- 7
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1352
- UID
- 225593
|
We may not be rich but CKY is affordable to us. Still we picked TSL over CKY for many reasons.
We happened to know a local teacher leaving a school with 50% "NET" teachers and 50% local teachers (not CKY, but a school with similar teaching style). She said that all the NET teachers were high-paid but they did not care a lot about administration, discipline, student caring and all those work are left for the local teachers with lower salary. The morale among the local teachers was very poor.
Please don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting that CKY is neccessarily like that. My point is, having too many NET teachers in a school may not neccessarily be translated to good teaching.
原帖由 belle 於 08-12-2 22:43 發表
I totally agree with you "一分錢一分貨". If you were rich, would TSL be your first choice??" If no, why???
If yes, I think TSL is really a dream school, go for it and I believe your son can study the ...
[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-12-2 23:01 編輯 ] |
|