- 在線時間
- 248 小時
- 最後登錄
- 09-9-24
- 國民生產力
- 6
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-8-7
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 8
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 14
- UID
- 151455
|
Seems quite strange that no response so far. I think it may due to the fact that KYS parents are usually low profile people or may be some KYS parents are puzzle themselves whether they have made the right decision for their kids. Not kidding, I met some parents think like that before.
My son is studying P2 now and, up to now, I have no regret to my decision and I’ll most likely put my little girl there next year. What I can say are:
- 1)
KYS is definitely not a traditional elite school which most parents will crazy for them. Nor they can provide a 95% (note not 100%) guarantee to you for full train to their traditional elite secondary school as KYS don’t have one. Apart from that,
you have to pay additional $33,000 per year as compared to other Gov’t subsidized schools on top of charges for books/ exercises books, extra-curricular activities, etc. - 2)
KYS provides an open learning environment to students and they show a lot of respects to students’ feeling which I think it is very important to kids’ development. From what I found from my son, teachers tend to drive the improvements by encouragements and praise rather than push them for improvements by telling them the consequences of no improvements. Do you see the difference? - 3)
For the academic level of curriculum, my comment is medium. Not very difficult, that is, they won’t ask P1 to study P2 materials, but definitely no easy as well. Homework is at a manageable level. The school tends to leave more leisure time for students to for their families and other activities. - 4)
Most parents will judge the school by looking at the school’s annual result of secondary school allocation. It’s definitely correct!! Frankly speaking, if you look at the 2006-2008 results from website, the results are already very good as compared to most Gov’t subsidized schools. KYS has ~75-90 graduates per year which divided into 3 classes of 26-30 students each. - v
~25-30 % to滙基書院東九龍(聯繫中學), it is not an elite traditional school but still a band 1 English curriculum school - v
~32-35% to a list of traditional elite school like聖士提反女子中學, 聖保羅書院, 英華女學校, 聖保羅男女中學, 聖士提反書院, 聖公會鄧肇堅中學, 拔萃男書院, 拔萃女書院, 香港華仁書院, 華仁書院(九龍), 英皇書院, 香港真光中學, 喇沙書院, 張祝珊英文中學,皇仁書院. I think no one will question the quality of schools on the list, right? Of course, some may argue that it cannot reflect the whole trend cos there’s only 1 or 2 students each year allocated to some of the schools on list, but the fact is total no. of graduates allocated to this list represents 32-35% of the total no. of graduates for that year. For me, if my kids are allocated to anyone on the list, I think it’s already not bad.
- v
~10% was allocated to other English curriculum schools which I don’t know the bandings. Examples included
港大同學會書院, 滬江維多利亞學校, 基督教崇真中學, 香港浸會大學附屬學校王錦輝中小學, 聖類斯中學 - v
Rest are either study overseas or other Chinese curriculum schools
It looks that if your kids can maintain their academic standard at the top 40% of the level, you shouldn’t have a problem in getting a band 1 secondary seat unless you are extremely unlucky or you adopt an exceptionally aggressive strategy in secondary school selection process which does not match the student’s level.
One more point I would like to raise here. We all agreed that young kids have different areas of development like logical sense, language skills, communication skills, interpersonal skills, etc. and the development stages may differ from each others. When choosing schools, most parents will look for a school with strong academic training which can magnify the strong areas of their kids. But will anyone consider the school’s attitudes towards those students with exceptional IQ but development delay in some areas like speech, interpersonal skill or self- management? I can see KYS pays a good attention and quite a big tolerance to these areas. I think students with similar problems can get a better learning experience in KYS, they will have exceptional results in later years, say P3 or P4, when their weaker areas can catch up with others and the exceptional potential and ability can be demonstrated by their results.
In conclusion, I will say KYS is not a perfect school but a low profile good school. The joining of the new headmistress, Gloria Chan, is bringing a new concept to KYS in additions to its traditional curriculum, more modern and with more emphasis on students’ international horizon. But of course, whether it worth the $33,000 per year you have to pay, it is not a point of discussion here.
I must stress again that I am not a staff of the school and has no incentives to sell KYS to anyone. I just want to give a better insight to those parents who want to know more about the school. |
|