名校會考成績一覽

judy

原帖由 hui916 於 09-12-3 18:30 發表
據聞是2006年星島日報刊登. 很多網站都有轉載.

星島無可能有咁嘅料！

我怀疑學校都冇！

daisy17772

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 18:39 發表
fsforth,
i agree,
high cost of school fee and boarding fee, far from home site, .........
applying for pri school mainly for having the through-train sec school. but if (i mean, if ) the sec school i ...

But even for CKY, they emphasized "happy learning" and they target for IB.   This kind of new school lack of track record and charge high fee.  For most int'l school, their primary school is "happy learning" as well, but they could train up their students in high school and enable them to go to top uni in the states/UK.  

So if you believe in HKCEE results, then the results do matter, particularly if you plan for your child to study uni here in HK.  But for studying abroad, in my personal opinion, results do count, but there're other factors that accountable for achieving good results in uni and  be admitted to very top uni.

daisy17772

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 18:32 發表
sorry, i don't agree on this point.

you see la salle, it can't choose its student, then why can it train up students of all kinds to become top in the sec sch?

(clarify: i like SSC a lot and i give  ...

I have heard for some years ago that SSCPS's secondary section is not famous for its academic results.  It's not new news.  What I heard is the current Principal is trying to improve the results and the figures do show this progression.

fsforth

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 18:32 發表
sorry, i don't agree on this point.

you see la salle, it can't choose its student, then why can it train up students of all kinds to become top in the sec sch?

(clarify: i like SSC a lot and i give  ...

就算是大部分出國讀書, 也不至於平均分得11分, HKCEE 又D又E點見得人!?

真係要再考慮下成本效益再搵多D資料先決定

hyto

很有用的資料。

daisy17772

Looking at this statistic, what interests me the most is that some of those so-called traditional good schools do not have higher average score than those not so famous schools, one of which is located in Yuen Long.  
It seems co-ed has more better than average results students.

daisy17772

原帖由 fsforth 於 09-12-3 18:55 發表


就算是大部分出國讀書, 也不至於平均分得11分, HKCEE 又D又E點見得人!?

真係要再考慮下成本效益再搵多D資料先決定

But I agreed that more effort should be put to have better understanding of the current situation.  Maybe we can share more info out for all those who are interested in sscps.

littlemak

well, i am not too concern abt the %. As chichipapa at another post said, which is very true, that as long as the % is more than 50, it is very good already.
good exam results also depends much on the students (our kids) themselves. the effort they put in. not totally rely on the school reputation.

also, i have a bit doubt abt the reliability of the statistics quoted at mingpao here.

i suddenly found that my mother-sec school at N.T. (not famous at all, in my time!) results is even much much higher than those very famous ones, ha ha ! i dont believe it, haha. even though i didn't go back to visit for 20 years already.

so i query abt the reliability of the statistics.

daisy17772

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 19:02 發表
well, i am not too concern abt the %. As chichipapa at another post said, which is very true, that as long as the % is more than 50, it is very good already.
good exam results also depends much on the ...

I personally not 100% believe in HKCEE results (I meant about this HK exam system, even that this statistics are true), I knew some ppl from top HK uni came to work for me, they were not brilliant.  Except that I knew a few with 9/10A, they studied abroad in top uni, they are exceptional and incredibly bright.

[ 本帖最後由 daisy17772 於 09-12-3 19:08 編輯 ]

waiwaibaba

原帖由 daisy17772 於 09-12-3 18:57 發表
Looking at this statistic, what interests me the most is that some of those so-called traditional good schools do not have higher average score than those not so famous schools, one of which is locate ...

I think U should assess the strength of a school in totality taking into account, inter alia, the results of sports and music in inter-school competition, I think the traditional famous school still prevail in those areas. Afterall, everyone only has 24 hrs a day and all-round development is critical for admission into top universities globally and future career. BTW 張祝珊 (sorry, use this school as example but this is an extreme case) rank about 60-70 in the co-ed section of 2009 Bank of China Bauhinia Bowl Award and Chong Gene Hang, ranking 7th in the boys section is a Band 3 secondary school.

大家樂

原帖由 siufu 於 09-12-3 18:01 發表
近兩年恒商應該大躍進, 無 25 分都應該唔駛諗...

恆商同莊啟程係預科書院，點會有

會考最佳六科平均分數。

25分係收中六個分黎喎

fsforth

原帖由 daisy17772 於 09-12-3 19:06 發表


I personally not 100% believe in HKCEE results (I meant about this HK exam system, even that this statistics are true), I knew some ppl from top HK uni came to work for me, they were not brilliant.  ...

我都唔信HKCEE成績, 不過, 我係指就算有"A"都唔代表真係叻, 只要有正常智商, 有心讀書既要有14分其實不是難事

Passerby

原帖由 waiwaibaba 於 09-12-3 19:16 發表

I think U should assess the strength of a school in totality taking into account, inter alia, the results of sports and music in inter-school competition, I think the traditional famous school still  ...

If taking academic, sports and music into account, I think there are only 2 or 3 schools in Hong Kong are all-round excellent even including international schools.

PMma

As far as I know, even in the so called "all-round" excellent schools, the students there are not "all-round" themselves.   

Very often, these famous schools "import" students with special talents in sports or music from elsewhere at various grades from time to time.  Because of the fame of these schools, it's not difficult to attract these gifted students to join them.  Of course, some of them may also do well academically, but they are often not the ones who achieve brilliant academic results for the schools.  

原帖由 Passerby 於 09-12-3 21:11 發表


If taking academic, sports and music into account, I think there are only 2 or 3 schools in Hong Kong are all-round excellent even including international schools.

hui916

St Stephen一直以來成績並非最強, 只不過今年出咗個10A, 令大家有個錯覺. 據聞它只是一間Band 2學校.

我認為要看整体平均成績.

hui916

張祝珊雖然谷成績有些過火, 但我認識的張祝珊畢業的同學都是超級勤奮的人, 能付出比常人多幾倍的努力, 事業容易成功, 這是學校培養的良好作風.

幾個張祝珊的朋友, 都成為非常成功的專業人仕, 其中一個仲成為副局長.

Passerby

I don't see any problems of transferring from one school to another school.  Many parents in BK are looking for opportunities to transfer their kids to a better school.  Would you say they have problems?

By the way, I do know quite a number of students they are studying in these so-called "all-round" excellent schools are really all-rounders.  They are elite class students, Grade 8 or even diploma in musical instruments and  sports teams' members.

dvb

原帖由 PMma 於 09-12-3 21:27 發表
As far as I know, even in the so called "all-round" excellent schools, the students there are not "all-round" themselves.   
Very often, these famous schools "import" students with special talents in ...

That is also what I believe.  The school is all-round but not every student.  Maybe only very few are really all-round.  

I don't believe that one can perform excellent in many aspects.  At most two, three is unlikely.  If one is considered excellent in many aspect, that means he is not excellent at all.

dvb

原帖由 fsforth 於 09-12-3 20:59 發表
我都唔信HKCEE成績, 不過, 我係指就算有"A"都唔代表真係叻, 只要有正常智商, 有心讀書既要有14分其實不是難事

I don't think 14 is difficult at all. 14 should be the minimum.  Good parents' kid should have more than 14 no matter which school the kid goes to.

dvb

原帖由 daisy17772 於 09-12-3 18:52 發表
I have heard for some years ago that SSCPS's secondary section is not famous for its academic results.  It's not new news.  What I heard is the current Principal is trying to improve the results and ...

It''s better not to expect the results will be improved so much.  If it happens, SSC may not be SSC.

Strong academic results is not the culture of SSC, I think.  Even if the school fee is so high, SSC will not give you strong academic results.  It should be something else.

It seems that a school doesn't need much money to "produce" students with good academic result.