名校會考成績一覽

littlemak

hiu916,
very good comment.
I think, those schools running IB system or running IB+local system may be more experienced and winning chance in the 334 exam sys.
e.g. choikaiyau? logos? GT? st paul coed?

vienpa

原帖由 judy 於 09-12-4 11:05 發表


靠估！

都估o岩, 係36.4%(2008)
資料hkeaa網http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/HKCEE/Release_of_Results/Exam_Report/Examination_Statistics/ceexamstat08_3.pdf
2008年會考所有日校考生中有68.5%既考生5科pass....
68.5%既考生當中又有53.2%考生6科>14分..
68.5% x 53.2% = 36.4%考生6科>14分

以前睇過有校網都係呢個數字..

[ 本帖最後由 vienpa 於 09-12-4 12:07 編輯 ]

littlemak

fsforth:

totally agree.

too many years ago lah, my memory abt HKCEE is not very accurate. too out-dated.

am I right? A=5; B=4; C=3; D=2; E=1; F=0.

if so, getting 14 marks in best 6 subjects is not difficult at all. "just if you got the heart and general effort to do it". agree!

if the formula is right above, i got 26 marks lah. But still i think i was not smart and could only barely survive in my pre-u and uni life. my Eng was "A" but when compared with my pre-U classmates, I was really very very poor! (almost failed in the exam).

aryee

原帖由 wootaitai 於 09-12-3 17:34 發表
玫瑰崗學校 7 --> wow that's the worst possible school in HK! does that mean average is F?

唔係，7分即係5e1d lor，哈哈，好好笑，7分只得呢個combination，因為6e係6分，4e2d又8分，5e1d唔多唔少

btw，莊啟程唔係預科書院咩﹖點解有會考分﹖

aryee

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 18:32 發表
sorry, i don't agree on this point.

you see la salle, it can't choose its student, then why can it train up students of all kinds to become top in the sec sch?

(clarify: i like SSC a lot and i give  ...

純粹估下，ls雖然唔可以揀人入，但唔好忘記第一round自行收生係世龔生有著數，以ls黎講，相信唔少ls old boys都會比自己小朋友入返去，黎自名校既daddy相信對子女學業會有所督促都唔定，呢50%既人同一般學校既50%自行收生已經唔同背景。再講，大抽獎既50%，ls位於九龍塘段，富有人家比例較高，成績追唔上，補習都補得返黎。好，比你真係讀唔上，學校無得揀收生啫，但可以換血ma，邊個跟唔到就換血，waitlist有大把成績好學生排緊隊。

以上純粹我估既，無任何證明，千其唔好攞黎做話題。

dad1234

原帖由 sheep30 於 09-12-3 23:03 發表
大家如要各校較新的會考成績，可參考以下網頁：

http://life.mingpao.com/htm/hkcee/cfm/hkcee1.cfm?File=2009book_index.htm

你可參考09年學校有的中六學額，在第一階段是否可以填滿，第一階段學校只能收本校夠14分學生，而 ...

留意個表: /符號代表無答  0符號代表無餘下空缺

littlemak

well, lets compare SSCPS and LS:

1.both having old boys (+old girls) parents; SSCPS can choose its students (private sch, having interview system) while LS can't, in the 1st round. so, in theory, SSCPS should take "better (no offense, just in theory)" primary students than LS.
while SSC students are composed of 75% SSCPS and 25% other primary school students with band-criteria.
and LS are composed of 70% (wild guess after "change-blood" a lot in primary levels) and 30% intake from other pri school with band-criteria.
so, the old boys effect doesn't count here.

2. region effect doesn't really matter. nowadays almost all parents in hk use up all their resources for kids. my friends (middle class of teacher-parents) living at TKO, send kids to private ESF school at shatin, cost around 9k/mth; friends at taipo (piano teacher mom and sales dad), sends kids to LS and Maryknoll (from what i know, they are like lots of other people "borrow" address) via lucky draw, also hire private tutors to teach kids, spending >10k per month. So, i think parents of SSC would not spend less than those of LS on their children's academic and ECA issues.

3. moreover, kowloon tong region is comparable to hk (e.g. taikoo shing) region, referring to LS and SSC student family background.

in conclusion, still an unknown why SSC students can't get higher exam scores with only average 11.6 marks over best 6 subjects!! with so good school and family and NS resources.

one possible explanation: the statistics quoted is not accurate !?

cmchang0927

hm.......... for my yr, 1996 F.5, (I think before SSC has clarified as the Eng Secondary after the change of the mother lang as the teaching system), my friend had 11 marks in HKCEE (Art subjects), she had her place for F.6 at the first round.  And the lowest mark to get the seat is around 9 marks.  Some girls from BPS to study F.6 in SSC that year also is around 12 marks.   So we thought that SSC is nearly Band 2 in our years.  But after the change, its student level raised cos' all the Eng secondary could grab better students.   So I m not suprised with the results.  And I agreed that if u chose SSC, u are not aiming for strong academic results.    You should choose it cos' 1. its environment 2. music 3. athletics 4. swimming...........

rabbitpiggy

原帖由 vienpa 於 09-12-4 12:00 發表


都估o岩, 係36.4%(2008)
資料hkeaa網http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/HKCEE/Release_of_Results/Exam_Report/Examination_Statistics/ceexamstat08_3.pdf
2008年會考所有日校考生中有68.5%既考生5科pass....
6 ...

真係好失望, 竟然得咁小

band 1 大約有7-80% 的人有14 分.

全港只有3x % 的人有14分

咁band 3 考取14分的% 咪好好好好低law?????

[ 本帖最後由 rabbitpiggy 於 09-12-4 15:36 編輯 ]

littlemak

cmchang0927,
you are right, ssc is changing and improving over the years,
but it seems 2006 is not too far from now?! just the exam results 3 years ago!
is it having a big jump in recent 2-3 years?

aryee

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-4 15:09 發表
in conclusion, still an unknown why SSC students can't get higher exam scores with only average 11.6 marks over best 6 subjects!! with so good school and family and NS resources.

one possible explanation: the statistics quoted is not accurate !?  

或者咁講，ls可能真係教得其法，正如好馬遇著伯樂一樣。
至於d數字，就真係唔知，可能係錯；又可能，原來我地一直以為既名校，原來係「浪得虛名」。時代不斷改變，有d名校只係食緊老本，有d地區學校又漸漸冒起。

judy

原帖由 vienpa 於 09-12-4 12:00 發表


都估o岩, 係36.4%(2008)
資料hkeaa網http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/HKCEE/Release_of_Results/Exam_Report/Examination_Statistics/ceexamstat08_3.pdf
2008年會考所有日校考生中有68.5%既考生5科pass....
6 ...

我經指引上了那條link，幾乎暈低。

表a，符合報AL要求的首次報考考生為55.1%，而首次報考考生而6科有14分的有54.7%。所以14分的正正有30%。

表b有問題。六科最高的首次報考日校考生<六科最高的首次報考日校考生且中英文合格。開玩笑！

fsforth

原帖由 rabbitpiggy 於 09-12-4 15:35 發表


真係好失望, 竟然得咁小

band 1 大約有7-80% 的人有14 分.

全港只有3x % 的人有14分

咁band 3 考取14分的% 咪好好好好低law?????

Band3尾既學校可以係少於1%學生有14分

fsforth

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-4 15:44 發表
cmchang0927,
you are right, ssc is changing and improving over the years,
but it seems 2006 is not too far from now?! just the exam results 3 years ago!
is it having a big jump in recent 2-3 years? ...

可能是津校時期收落既學生, 以後仲有幾年等佢地grad 哂清淤血!

小學成為直資後所收既學生有牌都未升F.6, 真係唔知會係咩野成績, 我唔求好多A, 但係平均14分都無真係很差

judy

band 1 大約有7-80% 的人有14 分.

未必有咁高。明報登的，都是有自信的学校。

我估band1 平均6-70%到。

cmchang0927

For the results, I m not sure, but the students itself apparently looks "better"
I saw SSC students now and they look different from our years, glasses, gd boy/girl hair style, etc... For our years, girls 1. shorten skirts 2. holding a comb everywhere 3. use branded school bags (top ones, such as bold, Jean paul, etc) 4. in love with boys.....  Boys 1. "gel" hairl 2. white jeans instead of standard school pants 3. branded stuff 4. in love with girls.......
There were 5 classes for our yr, the first class (I m in the first class!) are the good students!   For the second class, half are the gd students.... for the rest 3.5 classes.........
But I think it's not that bad, cos' they never take drugs, just a little bit went smoking, met girls/boys after school at the ice skating tai koo places....  so u know, overall, the academic results are not so good.
In our class, a boy got a seat in HKU medicine, one got a seat in CU architecture and also girls got seats in HKU and CU engineerings and Art subjects.
But some ppl just got talent in sports and music, they had opportunities to show them in this school.
I think it's good experience though, those were just teenagers' period, u can see more before you face the reality of the society.  So if you aim for execellent academic results, this school is not your cup of tea, but if you want your kid to be all rounded, it's a good environment.   
For the primary school, it's standard of eng is good (it was only a chinese primary school in our years) now.  My friend owned a tutorial centre and she has SSCPS students there (my friend also was an old girl from SSC from p.3 to F.7), she said that the English was very difficult but the Chinese is just so-so.  But the teachers seem to be friendly cos' she told me that they won't mark the homework as harshly as the traditional schools.  I think it's like an international school.   

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-4 15:44 發表
cmchang0927,
you are right, ssc is changing and improving over the years,
but it seems 2006 is not too far from now?! just the exam results 3 years ago!
is it having a big jump in recent 2-3 years? ...

good-boy

For SSC (St. Stephen College?), I think in the old days the students came from Gov't allocation.  How many smart guy would take it as top proirity in veiw of its far location?

As the school has recently changed to DSS, no one know what it would achieve in future, especially under the new 3-3-4 system.

God bless.

kaifu

Oh yes, my parents always frightened to send us there if we did not behave because it is a boarding school and we could only go home once a week!

原帖由 good-boy 於 09-12-4 16:43 發表
For SSC (St. Stephen College?), I think in the old days the students came from Gov't allocation.  How many smart guy would take it as top proirity in veiw of its far location?

As the school has recen ...

bakusensei

原帖由 judy 於 09-12-4 16:04 發表

表b有問題。六科最高的首次報考日校考生<六科最高的首次報考日校考生且中英文合格

sorry for not being able to understand your querry about table 6b.

According to table 6b,達到若干最好六科總積點的首次報考日校考生人數均大於達到同一總積點的只包括兩科語文均達第2等級的首次報考日校考生 (i.e. no. in 4th column > no. in 7 column)

Grateful for your clarification, please. Thank you :)