- 在線時間
- 133 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-8-1
- 國民生產力
- 9
- 附加生產力
- 67
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-22
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 210
- 主題
- 7
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 286
- UID
- 112964
 
|
First of all, I don't think wingsma intended to upgrade CKY when she started this thread - she's not a CKY parent anyway (right?)
DGS is widely recognised as an elite school while CKY is but a new school with less than 10 years of history. One simply can't compare the two in terms of history and "track records".
But when it comes to polishing students' works, I wonder CKY would work as hard as DGS or other elite schools - their stakes are simply too high. In fact, I doubt CKY could afford that much resources to do the polishing. If I remember it correctly, CKY's very first compilation of its Year 5 theses includes virtually all of them (less than 60 Y5 students at the time). That was impressive indeed. Then there are some 140 Y5 students in subsequent years, those students whose works are not selected are still given a chance to reflect on their learning... in their own words.
I agree that book publishing could be costly, but it just doesn't feel the same publishing online. The feel is totally different, especially to those who love books (I confess to be one), and I would love my kid's work in print. I don't see these books are meant for 'marketing' - but more a keepsake for the kids and parents. It's more for internal rather than external - for the latter case, it should have been published online to reach out to a wider audience.
CKY does publish students' works online. You would find they are rather 'raw' when compared to the well-polished works posted online by other schools. Go have a check on them.
I reckon it's too hot a discussion to compare CKY and DGJS. But wingsma might simply ask which school is more suitable for her girl. But the choice may be rather obvious - should she have a choice. My two cents' worth is CKY would give a little more breathing space for the kid.
|
|
發表於 10-3-8 11:07
