- 在線時間
- 559 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-8-10
- 國民生產力
- 114
- 附加生產力
- 342
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-9-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 99
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 555
- UID
- 31222
|
呢個問題永遠無圓滿答案 => yes, it has.
If everyone has the same/equal chance
=>fair
If someone has larger chance then others
=>unfair
P.S.
I get the benifits in this unfair system. It is because I (and my husband) studied in net 34 primary schools. Therefore, I don't need to worry about the address (I live in net 95) as I can add points as grad. student in round 1.
However, I find a lot of my friends try to 借地址抽 to increases the chance for their kids to study in their 'ideal' school. At the same time, a lot of schools complain that they can't chose their students by themselves....... Then, I feel the 'game' is unfair!
What I worry is: if the game keep continuous, all / most of the 'best' school don't join the game and becomes 直資 / 私立.
Then, only the rich people can study in 'good' school as they have $. And the poor can't as they can't support school fee!
原帖由 traeh 於 10-6-14 17:00 發表
點先公平?呢個問題永遠無圓滿答案。你話it is their own choice去山長水遠返學,但亦有好多人選擇就近入學,唔想下下坐成個鐘車,由天水圍去柴灣返學。但如果全港任抽,肯定有人屋企附近的學位,比"their own choice"嘅人霸咗,被 ...
[ 本帖最後由 ac321 於 10-6-14 17:18 編輯 ] |
|