- 在線時間
- 5460 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-5-2
- 國民生產力
- 60
- 附加生產力
- 84512
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 28290
- 主題
- 282
- 精華
- 3
- 積分
- 112862
- UID
- 107125
|
原帖由 greendotdot 於 10-7-8 01:34 發表
你嘅理論有你的道理,不過更要考慮埋實際情況和為人父母心態!
Personally, I appreciate your kind heart even we all know we can't do anything just wish them good luck.
I learnt a lot in BK 4 years ago about the SSPA. But very sad, many parents didn't learn from other's painful experience and repeat similar mistakes every year. My comments and not theories are harsh, but so real.
Back to your "factual info" also have room for discussion. (I don't add other schools which may create further arguement that's not my intention.)
Just refer to your numbers: 646 band one students, 30% allocated in DP, so only 452 students remaining for CA. Just take 60% girls in Band 1 vs 40% boys, so 271 Band 1 girls (316 for 70% girls split) for CA.
Open Nominated
St Clara 18 70
St Stephen Grils 6 99
Ying Wa 95
119 169
Total = 288 > 271 (60% girls)
Total = 288 < 316 (70% girls) the shortage can be compensated by other districts vacancies as per your list.
Why you take away 169 nominated vacancies? As some Band 1 girls in CWD will fill it up and spare more open vacancies for Tigi's daughter in open category? Am I correct?
Nothing personal, search in BK and you can see I did contribute some detail info related Eastern District date back 3 years ago. I did a model to illustrate how to work out the chance of boys vs girls in Band 1 and formulated the strategy in both DP an CA stages. |
|