優才 HKCEE 成績出了

judy

優オ之成績過得去，我估應該有band1水平，當然應末至band1学校之中位數。

睇唔出統計數字有取巧的地方。將每科成績之合格率，優良率都列出，都算係咁。

當然，最好有14分嘅比率。

21%學生有A，每人平均A率應>21%。

bowling123

同意有家長講 "如成績佳的小學生，有信心會派位成績理想，或者考進老牌名校，有多少人願意半途出家，到新校做試驗品" or "有見在直資取得好成績既學生家長可能受不住引誘,到老牌名校一試.

到最後可能由直小到直中既學生只是中層一批. 最top個批 (我相信有5%)好大可能已經他投在小4前.

所以可預見直中要打出名堂, 只能做好入大學既比率 (唔包associate/ive). 比到家長留效信心.

happyjess

沒辦法! 優才領導人是一個滿有自信的人.
最慘是令小朋友都過份自信

原帖由 evacalbee 於 10-8-12 04:14 發表
是的，我諗今年的會考成績會嚇走好多今年考的小一生。

校方真的要好好研究那裡出錯，那裡改善。空有自信心而沒有真正能力的人，出來社會工作都是個大問題。 ...

LittleKidult

原帖由 happyjess 於 10-8-12 12:54 發表
沒辦法! 優才領導人是一個滿有自信的人.
最慘是令小朋友都過份自信

睇智激校圖睇到d學生好鬼"精"

enidchiu

I think it's very narrow to judge whether a school is good or not only by the HKCEE results of the first batch of the students. If my children had the potential of getting more than 6As in public exam, I would not send them to a brand new school.  In my opinion, the first batch of students of a brand new school getting such a result in HKCEE is already excellent. Without the efforts of teachers and a good learning environment, I don't  think they can get such results. You may compare the first batch of students from other schools, not those with long years of history.

Besides, I think most parents who send their children to GT expect their children to get something that cannot be found in other schools. If parents want ONLY excellent results in public exam, they would better send their children to a school that stuff students will exams and homework only.

原帖由 evacalbee 於 10-8-12 04:14 發表
是的，我諗今年的會考成績會嚇走好多今年考的小一生。

校方真的要好好研究那裡出錯，那裡改善。空有自信心而沒有真正能力的人，出來社會工作都是個大問題。 ...

三佰蚊

作為優才的家長, 我會覺得是雷聲大雨點小, 名過其實.

mamimummy

各人的要求,期望與付出皆不同, 但要切記'聖若望'的教訓, 不要錯誤估計或被錯誤引導便是了.