St. Paul Coed VS DGJS

hui3328

The same topic was discussed comparing two schools again and again every year. You can search the key words of "SPCC vs DGS" in the Babykingdom Forum.

My point of view: in terms of overall academic standard and public exam result, SPCC is arguably the best in HK, as measured by No. of A attained, number of students with 6A or above, average number of A, % of candidates passing 14% in HKCEE, and etc. Despite not having the largest number of 10 "A", SPCC has been able to maintain a very impressive academic result over the year.

On the other side, DGS has the best English standard among local schools in HK. It also performs better in music, sports and other contests than SPCC. You should also consider whether you like a single-gender, or a co-educational school. Some friends I know of make it clear that they don't like single-gender girl schools, for fear of the environment being too competitive.

原帖由 syschan 於 10-10-6 09:27 發表
How does it different in terms of

1) study culture
2) loading to the kids
3) loading to the parents
4) common style of the kids

I need to assess my kid (and myself) whether we are suitable to join  ...

hui3328

Both schools target at well-educated middle class families, though there are some students from very rich families or celebrities. As a result, both schools require strong parental supports not just financial resources, but also good guidance, learning environment, working with the school hand-in-hand.

Workload at both schools is not an issue in junior years, at least not significantly more than other local schools. But the pressure will continue to build up as students advance into senior years.

原帖由 syschan 於 10-10-6 09:49 發表


Yes.... I agree with you hui3328.

What I am worry about is the loading of the study....

I heard that the kid needs to take many many tutorials for key subjects after school in general. I need to t ...

hui3328

SPCC今年會考生有179人, 小學部以前每年只收105人, 去年擴招後, 增至150人, 加上中一多收兩班, 將來中學每級210人左右.

SPCC及DGS轉直資後, 其學生素質比起其他官校已經較為平均. 個別官津校如La Salle, 皇仁, 華仁等, 其學生的更為參差. 據聞La Salle今年會考270人, 每班都有十幾人考得五六分. 所以入名校只是踏出等一步, 仲要漫長的路要走.

會考已成為歷史, 新高中文憑試明年開始, 最多考七科. 更著重學生的綜合素質, 評分準則也完全不同. 最高5**, 然後5*, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. 新制度下再沒有狀元. 大學收生可能加入一些主觀因素, 究竟那些傳統名校可以保持優勢, 或有新學校跑出, 大家拭目以待.

原帖由 telegogo 於 10-10-7 17:17 發表
你問中學定小學?

小學冇

中學有跟科分程度

hui3328

排名就很難講. 但裡面列出的各名校14分以上, 以及取得優良的比例應該幾準確. 請留意採用的是2009的會考成績.

原帖由 babyhappy88 於 10-10-7 15:13 發表
唔知呢個排名榜準唔準?
http://www.maths1000.com/index.php?action=schoolranksdetail&id=6

hui3328

精英班應該冇, 就算中一外面收入來的兩班, 亦是分散至原來小學升上來的班級.

DGS好像也不設精英班.

原帖由 YUWEI 於 10-10-7 22:14 發表
我知道spcc年年都有分班,
照講,應該係冇所謂既精英班,如果有,點可以年年都拆班??
所以,我覺得應該係冇分精英班......

hui3328

以下是從升中派位Copy過來, 各大院校2010年及2009年會考考獲6A或以上學生的人數:

請留意各名校的會考人數不同, 如La Sallle高達277人, 最客觀是以平均每個學生考獲A數量. 但由於教署並無要求各中學公佈會考成績. 所有的都屬自願披露.

St Paul Co-Edu:33 (2009: 24)
La Salle:30 (2009: 29)
Queen’s:24  (2009: 18)
DBS 21 (2009: 26)
Maryknoll: ? (2009:23)
Lam Woo:20 (2009: 11)
DGS 18 (2009: 20)
St Joseph聖若瑟英文:18 (2009: 12)
Kings: 17 (2009: 4)
BPS: 15 (2009: 10)
St. Marys: 12
Tsang shiu tim: 12
HK Wah Yan:  11
Tang Hin : 10 (2009:12)
Po Leung Kuk No.1 :10
李兆基 : ? (2009: 9)
荃官: ? (2009: 8)
Pui Ching: 8
Cheung Chuk Shan : 8 (2009: 5)
聖言: 8
英華: 8
True Light (ymt) ? (2009:5)
True Light, HK 3
LMC, Shatin 1 or 2 (2009:2)

原帖由 papa_pop 於 10-10-8 19:46 發表
This is quite an insightful observation.  Would one apply the same 'calculation' to other elite schools, eg, QC, DGS, esp those who boast a couple of straight-A students?  My wild guess is that the As ...

hui3328

對, La Sallle不能說有教無類, 否則其所有小學所有學生可以直升中學, 點解只有7成學生可以直升呢? 另外, 其中一收生除咗政府派位外, 亦有另一批是揀撰入來的. 其實也是儘量在谷尖子.

原帖由 judy 於 10-10-9 10:38 發表


盡量收最好的学生來教的学校，怎稱得上"有教無類"呢？

最衰都係政府，唔公佈学校的增值指數。家長無得知邊啲学校令学生進步，邊啲学校令学生退步。 ...