用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒
發新帖
查看: 11760|回覆: 3
go

蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


586
1#
發表於 10-12-5 12:28 |顯示全部帖子
我認同
原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-1 17:26 發表
I heard that 蘇浙小學 academic level is higher than 柴灣聖米迦勒...... is this true?

Rank: 4


586
2#
發表於 10-12-22 20:03 |顯示全部帖子
柴灣聖米迦勒 is already one of the most reputable primary schools in Eastern District
A joke???
in what way?

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-16 21:17 發表
Surely tuition fee $3000 is not cheap as some DSS only charge $2000 or less.  As such, I am struggling on the choices.  Some might think that it is quite stupid not to take the advantage of free educa ...

Rank: 4


586
3#
發表於 11-1-2 20:48 |顯示全部帖子
不太明白如果 allocation portfolio are simliar, 點解一間係60-65%,而另一間係55%

況且,從北循的學校網頁看,emi 應是55%,而近年都未有見到柴米的官方升中資料

略略一睇,東區既學校,有將升中派位放上網,而又有65%以上,應該有愛碟灣基灣同滬江

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-12-30 18:39 發表


Yes, you are right, they removed the allocation results from the website.

Another alternative is go to North Point Methodist Primary School and check their allocation results. From my memory, if it ...

Rank: 4


586
4#
發表於 11-1-2 20:54 |顯示全部帖子
不好意思,是北衛,不是北循

原帖由 stephanielaw 於 11-1-2 20:48 發表
不太明白如果 allocation portfolio are simliar, 點解一間係60-65%,而另一間係55%

況且,從北循的學校網頁看,emi 應是55%,而近年都未有見到柴米的官方升中資料

略略一睇,東區既學校,有將升中派位放上網,而又有65%以上,應該 ...
‹ 上一主題|下一主題