剛派了五級樂理成績

RMA

summum,

今次呢份 2005B 係好淺o既 (除左有兩分問 transposing instrument 外)，如果你小朋友係細o既，攞唔到 distinction 都唔意外。

musical terms 如果係用英文答，只要意思係 understood o既都會比分。

我都有 5 個學生去考，4 個 distinctions (其中兩個 11 歲)，1 個 merit，都係 86 分，不過個小朋友只係學左 1 個月就去考。

flutepiano,
我 5 個學生作曲一個 14 分，其他全部 13 分。

jumby2000

Hello,

My students also told me the papers are very easy.  

4 got distinctions (highest is 94) and 2 got above 85.

flutepiano:
作曲:  My students got 12-14 分

summum

Mscheung,
我只是暑期前收到那琴行的宣傳單張，而他又在我家附近，覺得時間適合，便參加了，但我覺得琴行不夠專業，所以不打算介紹給你。

mimi1234

flutepiano 寫道:
mimi1234,

咁你仔仔好叻喎，其他差不多無錯~~
我都相信你仔仔作曲冇乜漏，因為他咁高分一定係好細心做卷啦~~
可能咁巧我d學生同你仔仔你同一個閱卷員改卷?

flutepiano ,
Miss 話可能唔好聽wor，不過我都相信作曲在唔同閱卷員，係會有唔同分數(各位樂理 Miss，唔知我有冇講錯呢？)。
不過，flutepiano ,我見你話D學生報中文卷，而我個仔雖然學樂理時用英文、做 past paper係用英文，佢考試時都係用英文，但我諗住保險 D 幫佢報中文，我見成個考試centre都好似係有中文翻譯，應該係 group 埋一齊，會唔會真係同一個閱卷員？

kcarol

AAma_Betty
甘又唔一定係老師既問題既, 可以係老師同學生既時間唔MATCH, 甘想教又教唔到,  想學又學唔到

kcarol

識做=/=識教既; 識做=/=想去教

eg. 我自己都識conducting, 讀過& 做過, 仲成日都會coach 一d rehearsal, 但我唔會去教指揮, , 唔係ability 既問題, 一來係唔想教, 二來我覺得我係呢方面未係well prepared 去教人, 因為我係enjoy 去conduct a rehearsal, but not 去教conducting.

亦有一d學生佢地好想跟我學gd.8 theory, 我亦唔係個個教, 佢地既schedule fit 唔到我既, 我想教都教唔到, 有d我知佢地係theory 方面未必跟到我method 既, 我亦會suggest 佢地搵其他老師教, 唔一定group lesson, private lesson 都會有, 甘對大家都好, 我唔駛勞氣, 佢又可以有一個fit 佢地需要既老師

唔係所有識既野都要去教人既~~~

RMA

AAma_Betty,

Just to remind you there are many theory teachers who do not take up practical instrumental teaching practice owing to their respect to professionalism.

Are the parents challenging a doctorate of  Music Theory (i.e. DMus) in his/her musicality?

Most of the graduates / professors of Shanghai Music Conservatoire did not attempt any ABRSM music theory exams, they do have a successful career in HK.

Would parents believe their music theory inability since they usually refer their students to have lessons with other teachers?

Even though there are top instructors who teach in SPACE /  SCE / APA, a number of their students failed their Grade 8 music theory.

These students come to me and blame. Those who think they teach well should be reflected by students' results. And this should be an evidence not to be challenged by any others.

In other words, the ones only not to be skeptical about are those whose ability are reflected.

kcarol

AAma_Betty
Would parents be sceptical about the teacher's ability if s/he OFTEN refer the students to other teachers for Gd5 theory, assuming that the teacher is Gd 8 / Dip holder who seems to have time to teach?
如果老師、學生、家長之間既誠信, 只係建基老師教唔教theory, 呢種關係好唔健康

有時間, 真係唔一定要去教, 老師有時間, 想take a rest, 都可以係一個好好既reason; 老師覺得學生同佢既style 唔match, 學生可能跟唔到老師既method, 甘唔一定係老師既能力問題, 只係學生同老師既錯配問題, 留意一樣, 係樂理學習既錯配, 唔係學琴學習既錯配, 學琴學得好, 唔一定學樂理都好既

我自己30幾個private students, 單鋼琴計, 唔計其他野, 我有時間, 我真係寧願抖下!!

How can you make the parents believe that you have the ability to teach theory when you seems to have the time to teach, but you are just not interested in it?

唔需要make the parents believe, 點解一定要parents believe ??? 唔教就唔教, 個老師只係想教琴, 唔想教THEORY, 無問題架喎, 純粹係個人選擇

一個compentent 既老師, 唔係單單係depends on 佢有無教theory & instrument 既, 係好多好多唔同既components 組成一個好既老師既。

做老師既, 做好自己崗位要做既野, 用心教好學生, 自己要KEEP 住PRACTICE, UPGRADE 自己, 諗甘多""怕家長唔相信自己有能力""呢D野做乜?? 呢D問題太POLITIC, 同教學無乜關係, 有時間既, FOCUS 教學既成效好過啦

我唔認為RMA 係過份SERIOUS TO 你既問題, 呢個FORUM 好多都係家長, 亦有好多家長希望係度SEARCH 到一D有用既INFO, 如果只係因為香港唔係太多學生有一個DMus 既老師, 而得出一個CONCLUSION係無教THEORY 既老師就能力有問題, 甘呢個諗法好唔LOGICAL, 如果有家長將呢個CONCEPT 放左上心, 甘就真係靠害個學生

amy0107

hi !  i get 97marks on 2/2002.
i take a course on http://www.ftu.org.hk in tko.
he is a good teacher to tell me make some questions and get good marks !
but i follow him make a time table to do abt  six yrs
pass paper. i study very hard.


  :  :-x  :idea:

kcarol

AAma_Betty
或者甘講, 如果老師可以建立自己既authority, 甘佢唔需要再因為any reason 而要去解畫, 令家長質疑佢既能力

另一方面, 家長亦唔需要因為老師唔教theory, 而懷疑老師既能力, 因為唔教既原因實在太多

唔教theory, 係因為能力有限, 可以係原因之一, 但唔會係所有老師都係因為呢個原因而唔教theory

kcarol

amy0107
wow... great !! 厲害厲害!!
      

Homama2004

amy0107
請問是那一間(tko),老師姓甚麼呢???
謝謝幫忙!!

amy0107

homama2004

david in hang hau.

丸子

請問大約要學幾耐先至可以報考樂理？

kcarol

丸子
一般跟到進度既小朋友, 3個月左右就可以考架啦