用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 SIS同Victoria, 點比呀? 邊間好d呢?
查看: 7982|回覆: 49
go

SIS同Victoria, 點比呀? 邊間好d呢? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


501
1#
發表於 09-3-25 16:47 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
Pls. share your thought!
   0    0    0    0

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5500
2#
發表於 09-3-26 13:46 |只看該作者
SIS is an international school, whilst VSA is a private local school.  I can provide you with more factual information on VSA if you want to know.

Rank: 4


501
3#
發表於 09-3-26 17:23 |只看該作者
Thx cherubic! I just know from you that VSA is not an international school….As they are teaching in native English and Mandarin, I always think that they are IS. Do they speak Cantonese in school? Do the kids speak in Cantonese in school as well?

You said that they are local school, do you mean you are using local curriculum?

Thx v much!



原帖由 cherubic 於 09-3-26 13:46 發表
SIS is an international school, whilst VSA is a private local school.  I can provide you with more factual information on VSA if you want to know.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5500
4#
發表於 09-3-26 17:36 |只看該作者
During the class, the students speak English except for Chinese language lesson in which they use Putonghua.  The students speak Cantonese during recess/ lunch time.  The majority are Chinese.  

They follow IB programme.  

原帖由 Riesling 於 09-3-26 17:23 發表
Thx cherubic! I just know from you that VSA is not an international school….As they are teaching in native English and Mandarin, I always think that they are IS. Do they speak Cantonese in school? Do ...

Rank: 4


501
5#
發表於 09-3-26 17:48 |只看該作者
Thx again! So, can you share with me why did you say VSA is a local school? in what sense? or I may not know clearly what's the definition of an IS.....  :)


455
6#
發表於 09-3-27 01:34 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
7#
發表於 09-3-27 12:08 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


870
8#
發表於 09-3-27 12:21 |只看該作者
I am not sure whether the following link does help a little.  RC is on the list but ISF & VSA are not.  DC is not there perhaps it's too new and the list has not yet been updated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis ... l_schools#Hong_Kong


686
9#
發表於 09-3-27 12:32 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5500
10#
發表於 09-3-27 12:40 |只看該作者
I cannot identify a definition of "IS".  VSA, ISF and RC are called "specified school" according to Schedule 3 of the Education Ordinance (Cap. 279).  See this.


http://www.hklii.org/hk/legis/en/ord/279/sch3.html

原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-27 12:08 發表
VSA, ISF , RC and DC, etc., are not classified as international school according to the definition of EB.  They are all called private independent school. They have the right of not following the loca ...


686
11#
發表於 09-3-27 12:46 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


212
12#
發表於 09-3-27 14:56 |只看該作者
According to EB, some schools classified as "specified school" are due to the land, the land is given out by the government but the school has the freedom to run it.   It doesnt mean it is a international school or a local school or a private school.   The school can choose their own curriculum, like ISF and RC has totally different curriculum but they are in the same classification.   ICS and Yew Chung is also in the same classification too.   

Therefore, as a parent, it is more important to choose the school according to their curriculum, and no need to worry too much about how EB classified it.  


原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-27 12:46 發表
Thank you for clarifying the OFFICIAL name of classification of those schools as "specified school".

In fact I heard the term "Private and Independent School" from the schools themselves as well as  ...


686
13#
發表於 09-3-27 14:59 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


212
14#
發表於 09-3-27 15:06 |只看該作者
It seems that ICS has no such requirement.


原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-27 14:59 發表
Not only the land issue, one of the requirements of those "specified school" is that they should admit at least 70% of local students.


686
15#
發表於 09-3-27 17:12 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 1


18
16#
發表於 09-3-28 01:04 |只看該作者
Hi wisekid2007

Can you please enlighten us your finding a little bit further "....offically those schools should admit at least 70%  of local students...'?  

Where this piece of information from official website could be found anyway?

BR

Rank: 3Rank: 3


385
17#
發表於 09-3-29 23:13 |只看該作者
You may simply google "private independent school" and you should be able to get links to government documents.
There is such expectation from the government that 70% of the students are local. But it is also stated that it is in fact not binding requirement for the schools, and they can adjust the percentage according to demand.


686
18#
發表於 09-3-30 12:59 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2347
19#
發表於 09-3-30 16:46 |只看該作者
RC & DC 都係 ESF 集團經營的學校。
ESF 有一系列的學校,學生眾多,老師眾多。我覺得問題,根本唔係話舊 ESF 校,定係新 PIS 的問題。根本整體 ESF 學校都係集團式咁經營,我睇唔到學校有幾好。個個都吹噓 ESF 學生成績好,但係你地有冇諗過,學校集團咁大,有幾個考試考得好,有幾個入都好大學有幾奇?學生人數眾多,有三幾個考到 OXBRIDGE ,IVY LEAGUE 就好似好巴閉,你地知唔知同時根本有好多人讀唔成書?好似薛海琪就係 ESF 中學,佢 D 英文錯得離普,寫野錯漏百出,入去城大 ( 並非各位講咁,入到 IVY LEAGUE 咁掂,甚至中大港大都入唔到 ),讀埋 D 冷門科,重要讀讀下唔讀。當然,薛小姐個案唔能夠代表 ESF 全部學生,但係大家都唔駛報喜不報憂,淨係拎 D 叻的吹噓,唔叻就唔提。


536
20#
發表於 09-3-30 18:54 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
‹ 上一主題|下一主題