用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 塵日君並非主教而是教主!
樓主: 小飛俠
go

塵日君並非主教而是教主! [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1915
81#
發表於 05-12-31 11:25 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

wewangwang 寫道:
其實就算有普選,我相信都係會選到曾蔭權,陳太出番來都唔會贏到佢


我都唔會揀一個遇到困難,不順意時便擘炮走人,一旦見人地強勢攪得掂,政府挽回市民信心之後,又走出來,想坐享其成的人做特首.

希望這是我的猜測,陳太真的跟她說的一樣,不是想選特首!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


150
82#
發表於 05-12-31 11:26 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

I can see MoF's choice of language is heavily influenced by Bishop Chan. We can see this as a proof of why we oppose Bishop Chan's use of language directed at the police. There's at least one victim already. I feel sorry for the words you have choosen to use. You may ask Bishop Chan to forgive you and he would say that is OK since he had used worse words and God had accepted it.

"OK, you bunch of stupid fools who acclaimed the police."

Rank: 2


34
83#
發表於 05-12-31 12:01 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

妳都可能說笑,是否在踩緊新界東的選民。

塵日君做過啲乜嘢,對弱勢社群永遠獻出無私的關懷,請舉例子。

我始終不覺得那班韓農是弱勢社群,其實有組織,有策略的去主動攻擊我們的警察。不過正如Judy所言,如果當晚不是有一個自己人被拉,塵日君會不會有嘢講。

所以在BK,不少留言對塵日君的唾罵,亦是表達心中的極度不憤, 和對我們的警察無限支持。

在政治上,公眾場合上直言,就會加速其在社會上的死亡。


[quote]
wunma 寫道:
唔明. 點解直言係唔岩?

做公眾人物唔係更應敢言, 以自己的影響力, 去宣揚真理嗎?本人沒有宗教信仰, 亦不想談論主教和警察誰對誰錯. 但就主教的行為言論, 有以下看法:

說他不應談政治, 正如之前有人說過, 民生和政治, 是很難分割的, 主教又怎能對政治坐視不理?

說他太直. 我會想, 人之所以不能直言, 都是為了保障自己,  主教明知說了心底話會被指責, 會被人說他愛出風頭, 都要去做, 他肯定不是為了保障自己, 只是為農民說話罷.

主教眼見農民受苦, 不滿警隊行為, 可以理解. 主教用一個很重的形容詞 - "香港之恥", 來表達心中的極度不憤, 和對農民的無限同情.(當然, 這句說話對警隊來說是絕對不應該的).

本人十分讚賞警隊的做法, 同時亦敬重主教對弱勢社群永遠獻出無私的關懷.  


Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11241
84#
發表於 05-12-31 13:11 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

judy 寫道:


咁嘅水平,點值世界级人工?


x日君收咁多人工架........我以為係千幾蚊個月....跟住全包佢咋........

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3063
85#
發表於 05-12-31 13:49 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

wunma,

「直言」與「妄言」只係一字之差,但相去八千里。而係陳昏君心中,吐出是否真心話既直言,大抵除天主之外,都冇人會知曉。

韓農攻唔入警方防線,自動將武力升級,當時另一邊廂既鄧燕娥係維園開記招講,警方唔應該咁對韓農,因為韓農好和平,冇用武力,記者即時遞上錄影片段,

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3063
86#
發表於 05-12-31 14:30 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

lochan 寫道:
I can see MoF's choice of language is heavily influenced by Bishop Chan. We can see this as a proof of why we oppose Bishop Chan's use of language directed at the police. There's at least one victim already. I feel sorry for the words you have choosen to use. You may ask Bishop Chan to forgive you and he would say that is OK since he had used worse words and God had accepted it.

"OK, you bunch of stupid fools who acclaimed the police."


甚是,同氣連枝!


1972
87#
發表於 05-12-31 15:02 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


471
88#
發表於 05-12-31 15:19 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
簽名被屏蔽

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11251
89#
發表於 05-12-31 15:33 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

x日君收咁多人工架........我以為係千幾蚊個月....跟住全包佢咋........


Sindy,

搭錯綫.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3063
90#
發表於 05-12-31 15:39 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

[quote]
Henrymama 寫道:
梵蒂岡同大陸之間太多意見, 到依家都未有邦交, 教庭成日想大陸放寬國內的宗教自由, 但大陸政府一直都擔心佢地會宗教影

Rank: 2


34
91#
發表於 05-12-31 15:49 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

教主只是為一己的修女被捕而出頭,看不到他是為民請命,只是一個為己,包括教會利益的社會人仕而已。

不過無論如何,大家一定有不同觀點、意見。[話到口中留半句,理從是處讓三分],各人肯不去到盡,社會才會多些融洽,才易進步,否則爭爭吵吵,不肯退讓,就會停滯,甚至倒退。

在此祝各位新年快樂,開開心心過一個大除夕。

Rank: 2


34
92#
發表於 05-12-31 15:53 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

SANDYKL

您的幾篇留言,有point。

    

Rank: 3Rank: 3


209
93#
發表於 05-12-31 15:54 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

其實一個主教給市民這樣批評,應檢討一下......我本人覺得陳日君主教大不應該,成日發表他的偉...論 ,天主教是叫人愛人.....唔係鬧人......    
陳日君主教    求吓你,唔好再咁樣,這樣d天主教徒好難做,難道要鬧你老人家...嗎?

Rank: 2


68
94#
發表於 05-12-31 16:08 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

One day, the police that you said you supported very much will be the same police that will be used to beat you up when you protest against the gvernment. You will be sorry and you will think Bishop Chan has a point when he said the police was a shame to this city. remember the 4 June 1989 massacre, the pla, killed the people who used to support them. STORY TO LEARN, you stupid guys.           

Rank: 3Rank: 3


150
95#
發表於 05-12-31 16:56 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

What you had written is based on your personal assumption and imagination with no solid basis and proof and should be disregarded.

But your use of foul words makes me suspect that you are another follower of Bishop Chan's new religion - Blasphemy.


fannycheungmc 寫道:
One day, the police that you said you supported very much will be the same police that will be used to beat you up when you protest against the gvernment. You will be sorry and you will think Bishop Chan has a point when he said the police was a shame to this city. remember the 4 June 1989 massacre, the pla, killed the people who used to support them. STORY TO LEARN, you stupid guys.           

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11990
96#
發表於 05-12-31 17:55 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

lochan 寫道:
What you had written is based on your personal assumption and imagination with no solid basis and proof and should be disregarded.

But your use of foul words makes me suspect that you are another follower of Bishop Chan's new religion - Blasphemy.


[quote]
fannycheungmc 寫道:
One day, the police that you said you supported very much will be the same police that will be used to beat you up when you protest against the gvernment. You will be sorry and you will think Bishop Chan has a point when he said the police was a shame to this city. remember the 4 June 1989 massacre, the pla, killed the people who used to support them. STORY TO LEARN, you stupid guys.           
[/quote]


lochan,

看見fannycheungmc 這樣的邏輯,這樣的措詞,就可以知道寫這篇廢話的人的水平到那裡,除了遣責外,根本不值一駁。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


195
97#
發表於 05-12-31 17:58 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

motherofofour,

pls pay attention on the wording u used, i think its a little bit rude.

what's more, the purpose for the police to carry gun is not only targeted at those korean but also protected the police himself, do u know how sharp were those korean's weapons and how wild were they?! do u want to see any one of our police to be killed by them in this event?!

Rank: 2


68
98#
發表於 05-12-31 18:49 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

to use their guns to kill the koreans so to protect himself. is the life of A police more expensive than a korea's life? what logic ah?
the police paid to do their duty. no sympathy. if they do not do their duty, they will be sacked, that is why they have to do it. if they hurt or killed, the law will punish the offenders. koreas no pay, poor farmers only, yes sympathy on them, if killed or harm, no compensation.
          

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11990
99#
發表於 05-12-31 23:16 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

fannycheungmc 寫道:
to use their guns to kill the koreans so to protect himself. is the life of A police more expensive than a korea's life? what logic ah?
the police paid to do their duty. no sympathy. if they do not do their duty, they will be sacked, that is why they have to do it. if they hurt or killed, the law will punish the offenders. koreas no pay, poor farmers only, yes sympathy on them, if killed or harm, no compensation.
          




I am surprise that you know the word "logic".  But surely you don't understand what is logic.


Rank: 3Rank: 3


195
100#
發表於 06-1-1 01:06 |只看該作者

Re: 塵日君並非主教而是教主!

fannycheungmc,

i havn't said whose life is more expensive but it seems that u are largely sympathetic to those korean.

actually, do u know what are the duties of our HK police?

(here below is quoted from the offical website)
"Whilst the Hong Kong Police will ensure a safe and stable society on a day to day basis by:

Upholding the rule of law
Maintaining law and order
Preventing and detecting crime
Safeguarding and protecting life and property"


and, please understand that it is lawful for a police to fire especially to those violence attackers who have weapons in hand, in which they may attack or hurt the others...........

this is what we call LOGIC.

anyway, 公道自在人心!!!
‹ 上一主題|下一主題