- 在線時間
- 146 小時
- 最後登錄
- 12-7-21
- 國民生產力
- 34
- 附加生產力
- 62
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-11-26
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 304
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 400
- UID
- 168539
|
Some comments from my experience
1. In terms of the development of kids. I think both systems are working as they have been survive for long time. In US, Canada and Australia (those english speaking countries) use other systems.
2. In term of getting into university, IB has the advantage of get in the universities in most of the countries (in US, UK, HK, ..etc).
3. 10 years ago only few "very high quality" secondary school offers IB, it is relatively easy to get in top rank university. As more and more schools offer IB, the university will also consider the standard of the school. (ie. don't try the new IB school as they have no historical record - I don't mean they are bad but it is difficult for univerity to give a fair judgement).
4. Again it is the same for A level stream. According to my expereince, it is easier to get offers from UK universities if you are doing A-Level in those "famous" school as there are historical records. You can check the entry to Oxbriege, they will pick up kids from "famous" school in general. Of course, there are exception.eg. get "straight 10A"
Conclusions:
1. Good to follow IB scheme with good schools ONLY
2. Good to follow A Level scheme with "good" and "famous" international or local schools.
3. Personally, I don't perfer those new IB, DSS or private schools becasue there are NO HISTORICAL RECORD and it is not worth to take the RISK if you have choice.
原文章由 warrrren 於 08-5-11 23:19 發表
Sounds like you really knows it. Perfect. I always stand to be educated and love to learn something new. Care to enlighten us further and give us some examples? Which universities and which particul ...
[ 本文章最後由 matthewdad 於 08-5-12 18:04 編輯 ] |
|