軒下 vs St. Louis

iantsang

軒下: More academically aggressive and using Chinese as medium of instructions.  Campus is quite old.

St. Louis:  Need to pay school fees, all-round education with good moral and discipline, English as MOI and PTH for Chinese teaching.  Have own soccer field so quite good for boys.  Top students can go to QC too if that's why you target 軒下.

原帖由 esmehouse 於 10-6-6 11:05 發表
請比一比意見呀，唔該！

iantsang

No, St. Louis remains FULL EMI.

http://www.stlouis.edu.hk/download.php?type=news&na_id=231&att=2

More details for reference:
http://www.stlouis.edu.hk/download.php?type=news&na_id=231&att=1

原帖由 ernestchow 於 10-6-6 21:49 發表


St Louis好似中學快變中中

[ 本帖最後由 iantsang 於 10-6-6 23:07 編輯 ]

iantsang

軒尼詩官小 四年後轉全日
http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2202869

原帖由 smallpiggie 於 10-6-6 21:43 發表
學校成績, 派位我唔清楚, 但淨係睇為未來升中舖路的話
- St Louis 有中學直升, 但派位的話係中西區
- 軒小冇中學直升, 聯繫官中到阿仔要升中時都唔知仲有幾多百分比, 但派位係灣仔區, 似乎又好似少少選擇

Keep到中 ...