由學校剩餘中六學額看學校會考成績

grawong

please enter the following web-site:

http://news.tvb.com/hkcee/2007/

Sindy

有d未必原校就讀架....不過唔多唔少都反應到既.....

原文章由 grawong 於 07-8-8 14:06 發表
please enter the following web-site:

http://news.tvb.com/hkcee/2007/

NeoMom

原文章由 Sindy 於 07-8-8 14:07 發表
有d未必原校就讀架....不過唔多唔少都反應到既.....

Yes, agree! but if those students prefer to study in other schools whenever they have choice, does it mean something?


I am thinking whether some students study abroad. Like Marymount, quite strange to have so many vacancies.

VPLong

原文章由 Sindy 於 07-8-8 14:07 發表
有d未必原校就讀架....不過唔多唔少都反應到既.....

Mostly right! However, may be the school has a lot of
internation students who may back mother country for
further studying.

doremi_store

都幾有參考價值bo..

Thankyou!!

mr_won9

原文章由 NeoMom 於 07-8-8 14:32 發表


Yes, agree! but if those students prefer to study in other schools whenever they have choice, does it mean something?


I am thinking whether some students study abroad. Like Marymoun ...

我都好想知點解,因為其他同級數的如聖心,張祝珊,st.jo, MCS, GH,協恩等等都在第一階段已收晒。有人講話轉去international schools 同海外升学,但佔比例應該唔多,唔通足１４分人數得咁少? 請知情人仕相告

leschelems

你真的認為比例不大?

原文章由 mr_won9 於 07-8-13 08:04 發表


我都好想知點解,因為其他同級數的如聖心,張祝珊,st.jo, MCS, GH,協恩等等都在第一階段已收晒。有人講話轉去international schools 同海外升学,但佔比例應該唔多,唔通足１４分人數得咁少? 請知情人 ...

connie1214

我都覺[quote][/qu

我都好想知點解,因為其他同級數的如聖心,張祝珊,st.jo, MCS, GH,協恩等等都在第一階段已收晒。有人講話轉去international schools 同海外升学,但佔比例應該唔多,唔通足１４分人數得咁少? 請知情人仕相告ote]

我都覺得轉去其他學校或去海外升學的比例應該唔多, 通常F.5
起碼 4 至 5 班, 到 F.6 大部份學校得2-3 班, 在正常情況下應該
first round已收足生. 所以在first round收唔足生的學校, 我們造家長的是否要留意多些, 收多D風 post 上 bk.

leschelems

拿兩家學校作一個比較。

瑪利曼中一至五有四班，中一收１６０人，而２００６年會考，只有１１５人應考，當中百分之八十六考獲１４分或以上，即是有約９９人，中六有三班，滿額的是９０人。中五後離校的人數不清楚。

聖士提反女子中學中一至中五有五班，中一收２００人，而２００６年會考人數不清楚，當中約百分之六十三考獲１４分或以上，即是有約１２６人（我只能假設中五滿編，如有實際數字，請多多指教），中六有三班９０人。中五後離校的人數不清楚。

各位有其他中學的數字，請列出來作比較，在此先道謝。各位的意見如何？中五前，轉去其他學校或去海外升學的比例算不算大？那一家的１４分或以上比例較高？那一家較容易以原校生填滿學額？

原文章由 connie1214 於 07-8-13 15:26 發表
我都覺[quote][/qu

我都好想知點解,因為其他同級數的如聖心,張祝珊,st.jo, MCS, GH,協恩等等都在第一階段已收晒。有人講話轉去international schools 同海外升学,但佔比例應該唔多,唔通足１４分人數得 ...

[ 本文章最後由 leschelems 於 07-8-13 16:09 編輯 ]

uncleedward

Dear leschelems


It was 160 students for SSGC. In other words 80% students in F1 made it to F5 while at MSS only 72% made it to F5.

[ 本文章最後由 uncleedward 於 07-8-13 22:34 編輯 ]

leschelems

Thanks for your info.

You mean last year SSGC had 160 students taking HKCEE and, with a 63.1% rate, there were 101 who scored 14pts or more.

Thus, last year both SSGC and MSS had more or less the same number of qualified F5 graduates to fill their respective F6 vacancies.  Did SSGC F6 classes take in any outsiders last year?

原文章由 uncleedward 於 07-8-13 22:33 發表
Dear leschelems


It was 160 students for SSGC. In other words 80% students in F1 made it to F5 while at MSS only 72% made it to F5.

[ 本文章最後由 leschelems 於 07-8-13 22:43 編輯 ]

uncleedward

It was my understanding that SSGC did take in some outsiders in arts stream. It had something to do with their traditional class structure. One Science class and two Arts classes with no commercial subjects at all.

Besides, as some people pointed out here, the percentage of their students going overseas is quite substantial. I know a girl with 7A alos leaving for the UK after F5.

leschelems

Thanks for your info.

So last year SSGC had more or less the same number of 14pts+ students as MSS did.  I reckon at a ratio of 10:9, schools have difficulty to fully filling S6 places with their own graduates.

Parents also mentioned other schools they considered in the league of MSS.  I don't have time to recap all the numbers, let's see what I still have for 2006:

                    S1      S5       14pts+            S6
MSS:          ~160   115    99 (86%)          90
SSGC:        ~200   160    101 (63.1%)     90
Heep Yun:   ~200   196   141 (71.8%)   90-98
BPS:           ~240   229   183 (80.0%)      90
St Mary:     ~240   223    198 (88.8%)     96

I believe parents can conclude that the captioned assertion only reflects part of the reality.

原文章由 uncleedward 於 07-8-13 23:17 發表
It was my understanding that SSGC did take in some outsiders in arts stream. It had something to do with their traditional class structure. One Science class and two Arts classes with no commerci ...

[ 本文章最後由 leschelems 於 07-8-15 20:10 編輯 ]

sue2moumou

As I know that both SSGC and Marymount have a lot of students studied aboard after S.3, thus the schools will pick some outsiders to fill the vancanies.

mr_won9

原文章由 sue2moumou 於 07-8-17 22:57 發表
As I know that both SSGC and Marymount have a lot of students studied aboard after S.3, thus the schools will pick some outsiders to fill the vancanies.

據你所講,即是在會考前已離開?而會考班有outsiders補充；因此拖低整體成績 還是考了會考又有一批人study abroad

sue2moumou

原文章由 mr_won9 於 07-8-18 08:43 發表


據你所講,即是在會考前已離開?而會考班有outsiders補充；因此拖低整體成績 還是考了會考又有一批人study abroad

我知道係會考前已有一批outsider, 至於會考後多唔多人到外國我就唔清楚. 因為同我講d人(係分別係SSGC同Marymount d 家長)都話呢兩間中學會係S.4會有較多vancanies, 至於成績會唔會有上落, 我要問下至知.

sue2moumou

我睇過明報有d message, 有部份中學0學位o既時候同tvb報導果個有出入, 有d爭成日時間 , 嘩!好大分別噃.
不過無論如何都好多謝grawong post上黎, 佢真係好好人啊

原文章由 grawong 於 07-8-8 14:06 發表
please enter the following web-site:

http://news.tvb.com/hkcee/2007/

mr_won9

原文章由 sue2moumou 於 07-8-18 21:35 發表
我睇過明報有d message, 有部份中學0學位o既時候同tvb報導果個有出入, 有d爭成日時間 , 嘩!好大分別噃.
不過無論如何都好多謝grawong post上黎, 佢真係好好人啊

請問邊間

NeoMom

原文章由 leschelems 於 07-8-14 10:44 發表
Thanks for your info.

So last year SSGC had more or less the same number of 14pts+ students as MSS did.  I reckon at a ratio of 10:9, schools have difficulty to fully filling S6 places with th ...

即使估計去外地讀書的40人(200-160)全為最top果40名, 其14point以上的百分比亦是上述學校中的最低 (101+40)/200=70.5%. 從上述數字, ssgc成績的確不是太理想, 同意嗎?

leschelems

其實這個成績，和我以往所知的有很大出入，只不過我沒理由不相信學校的公布。雖則如此，我仍然認為只是個別年份的起跌，還是多看一兩年的走勢，才判斷她的成績。

原文章由 NeoMom 於 07-8-20 09:46 發表



即使估計去外地讀書的40人(200-160)全為最top果40名, 其14point以上的百分比亦是上述學校中的最低 (101+40)/200=70.5%. 從上述數字, ssgc成績的確不是太理想, 同意嗎?