- 在線時間
- 113 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-11-1
- 國民生產力
- 2
- 附加生產力
- 53
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-9-25
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 605
- 主題
- 4
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 660
- UID
- 102406
|
Frankly speaking, it doesn't bother me at all especially for language classes (and civil education). Even so I haven't heard of any negative feedback on BPS's compliance to formal curriculum.
As far back as I know of, even in the old days, they covered the syllabus well, though not in the way of tuition center's coverage nowadays.
My personal opinion is that our education is moving along the course of holistic development. Our past study mode of being told, i.e. reliance on teaching material in textbook and syllabus, is being challenged and fading out.
Indeed I heard of similar stories. Back in university, one of my professors once told me his getting along with secondary school teachers. One day, before class commencement, they were playing tennis with a teacher. About 15 minutes to class commencement, the then student (my professor) reminded his teacher not to miss their class while my professor, instead of attending that class, continued to play tennis. And when the teacher arrived in class, he merely outlined the study scope of the week. And left the class without teaching anything afterwards. Even though it's true, it's in the old days of elite students in an elite school.
原文章由 THRY 於 08-1-15 15:30 發表
Dear leschelems,
Do you know that whether the teachers will teach the text books during lessons? As I know some teachers from famous school won't teach during lesson.
[ 本文章最後由 leschelems 於 08-1-22 00:40 編輯 ] |
|